Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.63s
Board of Education v. Board of County Commissioners
174 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1917
In Collie v. … High School Board , 97 Ill. 327 ; Cook v. Board of Directors , 266 Ill. 164 ; Dickinson v. Dickinson (Ark.), 178 S.W. 930 ; Roach v. School Board of St. Louis , 77 Mo. 484 ; Koester v.
Cited 17 timesPublished359 N.C. 850 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublished619 S.E.2d 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublished615 S.E.2d 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2022
MIDFIRST BANK V. … MIDFIRST BANK V. BROWN 2022-NCCOA-788 Opinion of the Court v. Beemer, 132 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 29, 2009
Waste Mgmt. of the Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless Ins. Co. , 315 N.C. 688 , 691 , 340 S.E.2d 374 , 377 (1986); Bruce-Terminix Co. v. Zurich Ins. Co. , 130 N.C. App. 729 , 735 , 504 S.E.2d 574 , 578 (1998). 7. … Pulte Home Corp. v. American Southern Ins. Co. , 185 N.C. App. 162 , 165 , 647 S.E.2d 614 , 617 (2007). 8.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 29, 2004
Jon Kolkin, a board certified orthopaedic surgeon with a certified subspecialty in hand and upper extremity surgery with the Raleigh Hand Center. Dr. … Messer, a board eligible orthopaedist, due to the fact that plaintiff's health insurance would cover an evaluation by Dr. Messer and because Dr. Sampson understood that Dr. Kolkin had no further treatment to offer. 14.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 16, 2009
Woods v. Insurance Co. , 295 N.C. 500 , 506 , 246 S.E.2d 773 (1978); Harrison v. … Woods v. Insurance Co. , supra . 7.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStarlites Tech Corp. v. Rockingham Cty.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2020
V. ROCKINGHAM CTY. … V. ROCKINGHAM CTY. Opinion of the Court A county board of adjustment sits in a quasi-judicial capacity.
Cited 0 timesPublished357 N.C. 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2003
Cited 0 timesPublished126 N.C. 701 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900
Ponton, by reason of the facts set forth in the complaint filed in the above cause, and from any and all claims of every description which the said Shelly Brown may have against the said J. W. Ponton.” … Robbins v. Chicago, 71 U. S., 657 .
Cited 35 timesPublished202 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1932
Hatch v. R. R., 183 N. C., 617 , 112 S. E., 529 , Mitchell v. Talley, 182 N. C., 683 , 109 S. E., 882 , Hood v. Telegraph Co., 162 N. C., 70 , 77 S. E., 1096 , Broadnax v. Broadnax, 160 N. C., 432 , 76 S. … E., 216 , Bolick v. R. R., 138 N. C., 370 , 50 S. E., 689 , Killian v. R. R., 128 N. C., 261 , 38 S. E., 873 .” See Tieffenbrun v. Flannery, 198 N. C., 397 , 151 S.
Cited 43 timesPublished142 N.C. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2001
Evidence at the suppression hearing indicated that at approximately 3:45 p.m. on 27 January 1999, Detective Donna Brown (Brown), a member of the City-County Vice and Narcotics Unit in Wilmington, received a call from the … Ed. 2d at 260 (citing Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-47 , 32 L. Ed. 2d 612 (1972) and quoting Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 L. Ed. 2d 301, 308 (1990)).
Cited 0 timesPublished145 N.C. App. 33 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2001
This is because our legislature intended the term “specialist” to include a broader category of physicians than those who are board certified. Id. at 389 , 530 S.E.2d at 102 . Defendants cite Allen v. … On appeal, defendant cites Lupton v. Spencer, 173 N.C. 126 , 91 S.E. 718 (1917) and Boyer v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 5, 2001
Browns shift, often worked at the Mardi Gras Lanes and had little, if any, direct contact with plaintiff. 20. Ms. … Brown by telephone numerous times, but that "I never spoke to him. 22. Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedstephen.W. Isler v. . Isaac Brown
66 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1872
Freeman v. Tranch, 12 C. B., (74 F. C. L. R. 409.). Lea v. Gause, 4 Ire., 9. … But that legal right, being of the nature of a personal estoppel, would not bind Brown, Isler v. Foy and Harrison, at this term.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrown v. Carolina Aluminum Co.
224 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1944
Conrad- v. Foundry Go., 198 N. C., 723 , 153 S. E., 266 . The injury, therefore, was an “injury by accident.” Slade v. Hosiery Mills, 209 N. C., 823 , 184 S. E., 844 . … Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N. C., 283 , 22 S. E. (2d), 907 ; Conrad v. Foundry Co., sufra.
Cited 23 timesPublished204 N.C. 668 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1933
The pertinent idea was declared in Davis v. R. … Cedar Valley Electric Company, 174 N.W. 709 (Iowa); Milo Serich Railway Co. v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co. , 230 P. 15 (Cal.); General Box Co. v. Missouri Utilities Co. , 55 S.W.2d 442 (Missouri); Thornton Bros. v.
Cited 43 timesPublished111 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892
In Lassiter v. … Gillis v. Telegraph Co., 61 Vt., 461 ; Ayer v. Telegraph Co., 79 Me., 493.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna