Case law

Kirk v. Brown Shoe Co.

588 S.W.2d 62 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1979

For a similar holding, see Hendricks v. Motor Freight Corp., 570 S.W.2d 702, 710 (Mo.App.1978). … Section 287.490, RSMo 1969; Clapp v. Brown Shoe Co., 291 S.W.2d 209, 214 (Mo.App.1956). Plaintiff is awarded a penalty of $10,-796.85.

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

275 S.W.3d 748 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2008

O’Grady v. Brown, 654 S.W.2d 904 (Mo. banc 1988), greatly impacts the utility of Strode as precedent. … Hall, 117 Fla. 282 , 157 So. 646 (1934) and Schmelzer v. Cent. Furniture Co., 252 Mo. 12 , 158 S.W. 353 (1913) for res judicata and Brown v.

Dodd v. Board

693 S.W.2d 902 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1985

Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

207 S.W.3d 76 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2006

Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation (“B & W”) and Philip Morris USA Inc. … In support of their argument, B & W and PM USA rely on FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

Brown Chemical Co. v. Myer

31 F. 453 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 30, 1887

Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 323 ; Amoskeag Manuf'g Co. v. Spear, 2 Sandf. 599 ; Raggett v. Findlater, L. R. 17 Eq. 29; Manufacturing Co. v. Trainer, 101 U. S. 54 . … Croft v. Day, 7 Beav. 84; Holloway v. Holloway, 13 Beav. 209; Wotherspoon v. Currie, L. R. 5 H. L. 508; McLean v. Fleming, 96 U. S. 251 ; Levy v. Walker, 10 Ch. Div. 447; Seixo v. Provezende, L.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

97 S.W.3d 82 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2002

Brown, Jr. (petitioner). … Brown [v. Director of Revenue], 772 S.W.2d [398] at 400 [(Mo.App.1989) ].

Brown & Haywood Co. v. Ligon

92 F. 851 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Mar 17, 1899

Johnson v. Risk, 137 U. S. 300 , 11 Sup. Ct. 111; Bank v. Leyser, 116 Mo. 51 , 22 S. W. 504 ; Locke v. Homer, 131 Mass. 93 ; Farnsworth v. Boardman, Id. 115 ; Shattuck v. Adams, 136 Mass. 34 ; Conner v. Reeves, 103 N. … E. 439 ; Jones v. Childs, 8 Nev. 121 .

Brown v. St. Louis County

183 S.W.3d 286 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2005

Jevons Brown (Claimant) appeals from an Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) disqualifying Claimant for waiting week credit and benefits because Claimant was discharged for misconduct connected

Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

334 Mo. 517 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1933

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, as well as against the defendant Doneghy. [3] Defendants also contend that demurrer to the evidence as to the Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company should be sustained because it was shown that Doneghy … [Keyes v. C., B. Q. Railroad Co., supra.] Similar general instructions have been approved in wrongful death cases. [Browning v. Wabash Western Ry. Co., 124 Mo. 55 , 27 S.W. 644 ; Powell v. Union Pac.

Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

50 Mo. 461 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1872

(See Lynch v. Nurdin, 1 Ad. & El., N. S., 29, per Lord Denman, C. J.; Robinson v. Cone, 22 Verm. 213 ; Birge v. Gardiner, 19 Conn. 507 .) … In Birge v.

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Saxey

131 Mo. 212 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1895

State ex rel. Brown v. Wilson

216 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1909

Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 ; Kansas City v. Duncan, 135 Mo. 571 .] This direct question was presented to this court in the case of Black v. Early, Collector, et al., 208 Mo. 281 . … [State v. Metzger, 26 Mo. 65 ; Hansberger v. Railroad, 43 Mo. 196 ; Schell v. Leland, 45 Mo. 289 .]

Brown v. Bay State Abrasives

821 S.W.2d 531 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1991

Appellant, Robert Brown, appeals from a jury verdict in the Circuit Court of the City of St. … Sowell v. American Cyanamid Co., 888 F.2d 802, 804 (11th Cir.1989); Dougherty v. Hooker Chemical Corp., 540 F.2d 174, 179 (3rd Cir.1976).

Brown v. Director of Revenue

856 S.W.2d 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1993

He bases his argument on Wilson v. Morris, 369 S.W.2d 402 (Mo.1963). … Wilson v. Morris, supra, at 406 . The record on appeal does not reflect that the trial court addressed the question of whether the director had “good cause” to revoke respondent’s driver’s license.

City of Springfield v. Brown

365 Mo. 854 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1956

Brown. … State v. Brown, 364 Mo. 759 , 267 S.W.2d 682 , There is no allegation that plaintiff sustained any financial loss by reason of the aforementioned conduct of said defendant.

State ex rel. Brown v. McMillan

108 Mo. 153 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

board. … Zeiler v. Chap man, 54 Mo. 502 ; State ex rel. v. Frazier, supra; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 12 S. E. Rep. 1005 .

Brown v. Westport Finance Company

145 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 29, 1956

Alropa Corp. v. Smith, 240 Mo.App. 376 , 199 S.W.2d 866 ; Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 346 Mo. 28 , 142 S.W.2d 455 , 129 A.L.R. 829 ; and Christ-ner v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 228 Mo. … Jacobs v. Greening, 109 Kan. 674 , 202 P. 72 ; Root Grain Co. v. Livengood, 151 Kan. 706 , 100 P.2d 714 Bratton v. Exchange State Bank, 129 Kan. 82 , 281 P. 857 ; and Ahring v. White, 156 Kan. 60 , 131 P.2d 699 .

Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Brown

43 Mo. 294 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1869

But when the judgment in the caise of Brown v. The Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. … . *298 (Gott v. Powell, 41 Mo. 416 .) Lander was the attorney who gave direction to the whole matter; he was cognizant of all the facts, and is therefore chargeable in the same manner as Brown himself.

Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

99 Mo. 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Ed.] pp. 411, 414; 2 Sedgw. on Measure of Dam. [7 Ed.] 606, and note; 3 Sutherland on Dam. 426; BÍiss on Code Plead. [2 Ed.] sec. 297b; O' Leary v. Rowan, 31 Mo. 119 ; State to use v. Blackman, 51 Mo. 320 . … Railroad v. Warner, 108 Ill. 538 ; s. c., 18 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 100; T. & P. Railroad v. Curry, 64 Tex. 85 .

State Ex Rel. Ellis v. Brown

326 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 17, 1930

Isadore Katz did not appear before said board on any one of the said days as provided by law, but did appear before said board on Friday, August 1, 1930, and presented his said application. … Said board shall file all affidavits made as- aforesaid and carefully preserve the same.