Case law

Brown v. Weymouth

36 Me. 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

The charter of the company, c. 564, special laws of 1839, § 10, provides “ that the property and affairs of said company shall be managed by a board of directors, not less than three aor more than seven.”

Brown v. Ware

25 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1845

State v. Brown

712 A.2d 513 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1998

with Brown in each of the nineteen incidents alleged in Brown’s indictment. … State v. Doody, 484 A.2d 523 , 527 (Me.1981); see State v. Lakin, 536 A.2d 1124, 1126 (Me.1988); see also State v. Pierce, 474 A.2d 182, 184 (Me.1984); State v.

Brown v. Houdlette

10 Me. 399 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1833

This Court had occasion to give particular attention to the above-mentioned section, and a construction of the proviso, in the case of Jewett v. Green, 8 Greenl. 447, to which we particularly refer.

State v. Brown

119 Me. 455 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1920

Black on Interpretation of Laws, Page 141, Section 63, Emerson v. E. & N. A. Railway, 67 Maine, 387, 393; Water Co. v.

Fitzgibbon v. Brown

43 Me. 169 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

French v. Smith, 4 Kernan, 363. … Bacon v. Towne, 4 Cush., 217 ; James v. Phelps, 11 Ad. & Ell., 483. “ We are inclined to think, says Shaw, C.

Morrison v. Brown

84 Me. 82 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1891

S., c. 61, § 5, authorizing a married woman to prosecute suits at law in her own name, as if unmarried, refers to those by the wife against third persons (Brown v. … Abbott v. Abbott 67 Maine, 304; Libby v. Berry, 74 Maine, 286.

Brown v. Bates

55 Me. 520 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

Smith v. People’s Bank, 24 Maine, 185. And the sheriff’s deed does not purport to convey anything but the equity of redemption. … Burnett v. Pratt, 22 Pick., 556 . And tenants in common may all, or any two or more, join in the suit to recover the land, or any one ¡may sue alone. R. S., c. 104, § 9.

Patane v. Brown

792 A.2d 1086 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2002

Patane came back outside while Brown was picking up branches from the bush, and she grabbed one of the branches that Brown was holding. … Brown’s second argument cannot succeed. [¶ 11] Brown also argues that the court erred in finding that Patane had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Brown committed criminal threatening.

State v. Brown

488 A.2d 939 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 13, 1985

In view of our decision in State v. Freeman, 487 A.2d 1175 (Me.1985), that section 1312-C is unconstitutional, we need not consider the issue raised by Brown and we express no opinion thereon. … The trial court should not rule upon the qualifications of an expert witness in advance of that witness’s testimony and commits no error when it declines to do so. 1 See State v.

Brown v. True

123 Me. 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 13, 1923

C., 1134 and note; for sale of both real and personal property, Meyers v. Schemp, 67 Ill., 469 , Pond v. Sheehan, 132 Ill., 312,, Becker v. Mason, 30 Kan., 697 . Duteil *291 v. Muggins, 192 Ky., 616 , 20 A. L. … Legal title passes at once to the mortgagee upon delivery, Gilman v. Wills, 66 Maine, 273; Allen Co. v. Emerton, 108 Maine, 221, 224; Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Walton, 116 Maine, 469.

Brown v. State

153 Me. 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1958

Brown v. Cousens

51 Me. 301 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864

The original writ was dated July 10, 1858, and the declaration was in assumpsit upon two promissory notes dated Feb. 14, 1850, and payable to Henry Brown or order in six- months and one year respectively. … They purport to be witnessed by Francis Brown, and were indorsed by the payee, the day after they were made, " accountable for debt and costs without demand on me or the maker,” to E. R.

Brown v. Allen

54 Me. 436 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

Call v. Mitchell, 39 Maine, 465. In all cases in which an action is dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the court in which it is commenced, the defendant is entitled to a judgment for costs. Hunt v. … Hanover, 8 Met., 343 ; Elden v. Dwight Manufacturing Co., 4 Gray, 201 .

Brown v. Moran

42 Me. 44 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

State v. Brown

41 Me. 535 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

Commonwealth v. Dawney, 9 Mass. 520 . It was proper that the writ should be returnable to a term of the Court holden for the transaction of criminal business. 2. … It is a general principle that a recognizance should recite the cause of the caption. 9 Mass., before cited; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. 232 ; Wingate, in error, v. Commonwealth, 5 Cush. 446 ; State v.

Howard v. Brown

21 Me. 385 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1842

Bean v. Parker, 17 Mass. R. 591 . … Cutter v. Whittemore, 10 Mass. R. 442 ; Scott & al. v. Whipple & als. 5 Greenl. 336; Haskins & al. v. Lombard & als. 16 Maine R. 140.

Brown v. West

73 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 27, 1881

Bicknell v. Trickey, 34 Maine, 273 ; Uran v. Houdlette, 36 Maine, 15 ; Bangs v. Watson, 9 Gray, 211 .

Brown v. Rouillard

117 Me. 55 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 1917

Brown, in his good name and reputation, on the fourth day of September, A. … Brown, did fraudulently, falsely, maliciously, openly and publicly charge the said Leslie J.

Brown v. Strickland

32 Me. 174 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850