Case law

People v. Brown

76 Cal. 573 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888

Objection was made to this question, the objection was overruled, and the defendant answered, “ No, sir; I did not.” ' Conceding that the last question was improperly allowed, under the authority of People v.

Brown v. Merlo

8 Cal. 3d 855 · California Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1973

Brown was a passenger as distinguished from a guest under the guest statute. … has operated to bar recovery by an auto guest injured while physically inside the vehicle, but has allowed recovery by a nonpaying passenger who is injured while haying one foot on the ground and one foot on the running board

Phelps v. Brown

95 Cal. 572 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1892

Brown & Ensign.’ “‘We agree to release the signers of this receipt from any expense, legal or otherwise. “‘Brown & Ensign.’” Upon these facts two questions arise: 1. … (Scott v. Glenn, 87 Cal. 221 ; Dennis v. Strassburger, 89 Cal. 583 ; Easton v. Montgomery, 90 Cal. 307 ; Anderson v. Strassburger, 92 Cal. 38 .) The respondents endeavor to distinguish Drew v.

Brown v. Smith

55 Cal. App. 4th 767 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1997

Brown) and her husband, Lewis Brown (Mr. Brown), former tenants at the Smiths’ apartment building. … Here, Brown has effectively alleged an intentional tort in the guise of a statutory Unruh Civil Rights Act cause of action. However, since Harris v.

Bastajian v. Brown

19 Cal. 2d 209 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1941

Comstock v. James E. Brown, et al. … Brown was his client and I was employed to try the case for Spalding. I do not know where Brown is and you know Spalding has been dead several months. I have no file.

People v. Brown

81 Cal. App. 226 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1927

In Wyatt v. … Quoting from the opinion of Judge Bynum, in Lewis v. Board of Commrs., 74 N.C. 199 : `None but witnesses have any business before them. . . .

People v. Brown

45 Cal. 2d 640 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1955

United States, 285 F. 1, 2 ; State v. Wills, 91 W.Va. 659 [ 114 S.E. 261, 264 , 24 A.L.R. 1398 ]; Haynes v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. 553 [ 9 S.W.2d 1043 ]; State v. Jokosh, 181 Wis. 160 [ 193 N.W. 976, 977 ]; see Taylor v. … (Johnson v. United States, supra, 333 U.S. 10, 16-17 ; United States v. Di Re, supra, 332 U.S. 581, 595 ; Lustig v. United States, 338 U.S. 74, 80 [ 69 S.Ct. 1372 , 93 L.Ed. 1819 ] ; Byars v.

Brown v. Campbell

100 Cal. 635 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1893

The attachment, at least in the second action of Priest v. Brown, was levied upon the entire interest of the judgment debtor in the land described in the trust deed. … (Buchanan v. Marsh, 17 Iowa, 494 ; Crim v. Walker, 79 Mo. 335 ; Claflin v. McDermott, 12 Fed. Rep. 375; Tarbell v. Griggs, 3 Paige, 207 ; 23 Am. Dec. 790 .) 3.

People v. Brown

92 Cal. App. 2d 360 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1949

Unwrapping the newspaper, he discovered it contained a brown powder, a small portion of which turned red when he applied nitric acid. … The piece of newspaper in which the brown substance was wrapped fitted the torn corner of said newspaper.

Brown v. Johnson

45 Cal. 76 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

People v. Brown

46 Cal. 3d 432 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1988

Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 544 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], footnote 17, reversed on another ground sub nom. California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934 , 107 S.Ct. 837 ]. We noted in People v. … (California v. Brown, supra, 479 U.S. 538, 542-543 (plur. opn. by Rehnquist, C. J.) & 544-546 (conc. opn. by O’Connor, J.) [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934, 940-943 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 839-841 & 841-842].)

Carey v. Brown

58 Cal. 180 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1881

(Newcomb v. Horton, 18 Wisc. 566.) … (Bonds v. Hickman, 29 Cal. 460 .)

McCormick v. Brown

36 Cal. 180 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1868

(Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351 ; Sands v. Gelston, 15 John. 511 ; Jones v. Moore, 5 Binn. 573 ; Berghaus v. Calhoun, 6 Watts, 219 ; De Forrest v. Hunt, 8 Conn. 185 ; Russell v. Copp, 5 N. H. *186 154; Harrison v. … Handley, 1 Bibb. 443; Bell v. Rowland, 1 Hardin, 301 ; Aug. on Lim., Sec. 231, and note.)

Deidesheimer v. Brown

8 Cal. 339 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

Act, § 541; White well v. Barbier and others, January, 1857. But we would not be understood as expressing any opinion as to whether such a judgment could be collaterally impeached or not.

People v. Brown

92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 433 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2000

{People v. Rodrigues, supra, at p. 1124.) … In People v.

People v. Brown

6 Cal. App. 5th 1074 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2016

(c)(37); People v. … (People v.

Brown v. McAllister

39 Cal. 573 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

(Clark v. McElvy, 11 Cal. 161 ; Yonge v. Pacific M. S. S.

Brown v. Jenks

98 Cal. 10 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1893

Brown v. Newby

39 Cal. App. 2d 615 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1940

(See Brown v. Newby, 8 Cal. App. (2d) 203 [ 47 Pac. (2d) 1076 ].)

Brown v. Martin

25 Cal. 82 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

(Haine v. Baker, 1 Seld. 359.)