Case law

Misch v. O'Hara

9 Daly 361 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 6, 1880

of a boarder (Stewart v. … Pr. 62 ; Jones v. Morrill, 42 Barb. 623 ; Cady v. McDowell, 1 Lans. 484, 487 ; Shafer v. Guest, 5 Robt. 264; Edwards on Bills, 2 ed. §§ 476, 477).

Zimmer v. Benchmark Management Corp.

20 Pa. D. & C.4th 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Jun 15, 1993

Counsel on behalf of Brown Brothers Loblaws entered an appearance despite the fact that Brown Brothers Loblaws had never been served and was a non-entity. … The court in Schaffer v.

Warren v. County of Hudson

23 N.J. Misc. 252 · Hudson County Superior Court · Jan 3, 1945

Rep. 491 ; Potter v. Borough of Metuchen, 108 N. J. L. 447; 155 Atl. Rep. 369 ; Smathers v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic County, 113 N. J. L. 281; 174 Atl. Rep. 336 . … Lindabury v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, County of Ocean, 47 N. J. L. 417; 1 Atl. Rep. 701 ; Van Emburgh v. Freeholders of Bergen, 87 N. J. L. 637; 94 Atl. Rep. 586 .

Pateman v. Marra

138 Misc. 2d 807 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1988

As a separate body, the Planning Board was required to render its own determination of petitioners’ application (Village Law § 7-728 [4]; cf., Matter of Woodhull Assocs. v Board of Trustees, 63 AD2d 677 ). … With respect to respondents’ objection as to form, such objection was not a basis for the Planning Board to withhold its determination (Matter of Di Stefano v Miller, 116 AD2d 575, 576 ; Matter of Wallkill Manor v Coulter

Martin County v. Askew

38 Fla. Supp. 50 · Circuit Court of the 2nd Judicial Circuit of Florida, Leon County · Nov 22, 1972

See State v. Henderson, Fla. 1939, 188 So. 351 . … Tallow Corp. v. Bryan, (4DCA-1970) 237 So.2d 308 ; Neal v. Bryant, Fla. 1962, 149 So.2d 529 . However, in Reid v.

Kaplan v. Elliot

145 Misc. 863 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1932

Deverell v. Musical Mutual Protective Union, 118 N. Y. 101 .) … Holmstrom v. Independent Dock Builders’ Union ( 164 App.

City of Rochester v. Annis

185 Misc. 518 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1945

In view of this decision it is not necessary to now consider the regularity of any of the proceedings taken by the Town Board. … (see Matter of Ramsay *522 v. Town Board of Hempstead, 241 App. Div. 83 , and cases there cited).

People ex rel. Diaz v. Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility

90 Misc. 2d 1000 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1977

It is relator’s contention that the mandate of Morrissey v Brewer ( 408 US 471 ) for a prompt final parole revocation hearing is also a mandate for a complete hearing and that the failure of the board to make a time assessment … by the board for re-release.

In re Stylemaster Department Store, Inc.

7 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1956

(Matter of Cash v. Bates, 301 N. Y. 258 ; Toscano v. McGoldrick, 300 N. Y. 156 ; Matter of Mallen v. Morton, 300 N. Y. 478 ; Matter of Millicker v. Board of Education, 300 N. Y. 634 ; Matter of Foy v. Brennan, 285 App. … Div. 669 ; Alliano v. Adams, 140 N. Y. S. 2d 443; Matter of Kenny v. Loos, 286 App. Div. 97 ; Wyatt v. Armstrong, 59 N. Y. S. 2d 502.)

In re Bland's Estate

10 Fla. Supp. 143 · Palm Beach County Judge's Court · Apr 10, 1957

Marsicano v. Marsicano, 79 Fla. 278 , 84 So. 156 . If Richard Bland and Lena Lawson were validly married then the estate will descend to the heirs of Lena who died subsequently to Bland. … In an early Florida case, Parker v.

Marsh v. Berry

7 Cow. 344 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1827

He stated that a contract to purchase the farm, was given by one Brown to him and the plaintiff jointly; which did not expire until after the trespass, if any, was committed; that he and the plaintiff divided the premises … (Livingston v. Bishop, 1 John. 290 .) The consequence is, that the witness was admissible.

Petchanuk v. Mohlsick

206 Misc. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1954

(Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 152 ; Brown v. Brown, 79 Hun 44 , affd. 150 N. Y. 574 .) … Brown, 79 Hun 44 , affd. 150 N.

Freeman v. City of Yonkers

205 Misc. 947 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1954

(See Buckley v. Fasbender, 281 App. Div. 985 , and Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325, 332-333 .) … (Hudson v. Town of Oyster Bay, supra.)

Felix v. Wax

13 Pa. D. & C.2d 600 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 29, 1958

The defendant cites Snyder v. … A State board may, of course, upon advice of the Attorney General, elect to proceed against an unlicensed practitioner: Commonwealth v. McNatt, 84 D. & C. 479 (1952).

Groad v. Jansen

13 Misc. 2d 741 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1958

The letter dated December 17, 1957, addressed to the superintendent of schools, requesting that petitioner “ be examined in accordance with the By-Laws of the Board of Education ” is not a report within the meaning of section … The legislative intent to protect employees of the board of education from needless harassment, while overcoming the effect of the holding in Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v.

Denison v. Seymour

9 Wend. 9 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

In Bussy v. … The case of Webb v.

Davis v. Building Maintenance Industries, Inc.

58 Pa. D. & C.2d 153 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Aug 31, 1972

The leading case in this area is Birl v. … DeGasperi v. Valicenti, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 455 , 181 A. 2d 862 (1962); Callano v. Oakwood Park Homes Corp., 91 N. J. Superior Ct. 105, 219 A. 2d 332 (1966); Paschall’s Inc. v. Dozier, 219 Tenn. 45 , 407 S.

Magnin v. Dinsmore

6 Jones & S. 248 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 9, 1874

Brown ( 9 Wend. 86 ), it was held that the sum of eleven thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, contained in an ordinary traveling-trunk, could not be considered as part of the passenger’s baggage. In Pardee v. … And the cases of Duff v. Budd (6 Moore, 469); Brooke v. Pickwick (4 Bing. 220 , and Beck v.

Hilbol Realty, Inc. v. Barnhart

205 Misc. 187 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1953

Such being the case, the board of trustees of the village could act as planning board upon plats submitted; when it so acted, however, a provision applying to such planning board applied to the board of trustees as well. … (See Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46 .)

Fensterer v. Pressure Lighting Co.

85 Misc. 621 · City of New York Municipal Court · May 15, 1914

Ward v. City Trust Co., 192 N. Y. 61 ; Niagara Woolen Co. v. Pacific Bank, 141 App. Div. 265 ; Standard Steam Specialty Co. v. Corn Exchange Bank, 84 Misc. Rep. 445 ; National Bank of Republic v. … Co. v. Chatham National Bank, 127 id. 517 ; Hoyt v. Thompson’s Exrs., 19 id. 207 ; Olcott v. Tioga R. R. Co., 27 id. 546 ; Metropolitan T. & T. Co. v. Domestic I. & T. Co., 14 Atl. Rep. (N. J.) 907.