Case law

Majcher v. Bronder

22 Pa. D. & C.2d 218 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · May 19, 1960

The questions herein involved arise under articles III and V of the said contract and the arbitration thereof is governed by the provisions of the Arbitration Act of April 25,1927, P. … Superior Ct. 91 ; Wirkman v. Wirkman Company, 392 Pa. 63 ; Aster v. The Jack Aloff Company, 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 615 .

Collins v. Heffernan

187 Misc. 165 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1946

This is an application to set aside the action of the Board of Elections declaring invalid the designating petition of Charles A. … Insofar as the petitioner seeks to set aside the action of the Board of Elections it is based on the fact that the Board of Elections did not have the right to seek evidence of facts not appearing on the face of the petition

Sowers v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

20 Ohio Misc. 115 · Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 3, 1969

The correlative of ‘employee.’ ” In the case of Marting v. … Beliable, probative and substantial evidence has been defined by the court in the case of Ohio Real Estate Commission v.

Hook v. Kenyon

9 N.Y.S. 40 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1890

Brooks v. Schwerin, 54 N. Y. 348 . … Reynolds v. Robinson, 64 N. Y. 593 . “A married woman owes no duty to her husband * * * to carry on any business in his house or elsewhere for the purpose of earning money for him.” Coleman v. Burr, 93 N. Y. 30 .

Henderson v. La Guardia

182 Misc. 1071 · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1944

In 1938 the Court of Appeals of the State of New York in rendering its opinion in Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrick ( 279 N. … Y. 246, 248 ) stated: “ It is the duty of the Board of Estimate (formerly Board of Estimate and Apportionment) to make the necessary appropriations to meet such county charges.

Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co.

173 Misc. 188 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1940

(Browning v. City of Waycross, 233 U. S. 16, 22 .) … Justice McReynolds said (at p. 510), “ We think the recited facts clearly show local business separate and distinct from interstate commerce within the doctrine announced and applied in Browning v. Waycross, 233 U.

Torpey v. Williams

3 Daly 162 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1869

the tug or barge was licensed by them (Murphy v. … The Commissioners had no authorized agents on board of the tug.

In re Investigation of the Financial Affairs

59 Misc. 388 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1908

Village of Fort Edward v. Fish, 156 ET. V. 363. … La Canandaigua v. Hayes, 90 App.

Collier Service Corp. v. Boland

167 Misc. 709 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1938

(Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U. S. 142 .) … In Jeffery-DeWitt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (91 F. [2d] 134; certiorari denied, 302 U. S. 731 ; 58 S.

Murray v. Columbian Insurance

11 Johns. 302 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1814

In Riley v. … purchased and put on board the Rolla, at Messina.

Rice v. Caldwell

201 Misc. 952 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1951

It should be pointed out the plaintiff board is also constituted a body corporate by sections 1804 and 1701. (Schoen v. Board of Educ., Cambridge Central School Dist., 274 App. Div. 682 [3d dept., 1949].) … (Deering v. Reilly, 167 N. Y. 184 [1901].)

Loos v. City of New York

170 Misc. 14 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1939

Corp. v. Public Service Comm. ( 264 N. Y. 230 ) the term “ franchises ” was defined as “ consents.” And in Greenberg v. … McLean v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401, 405 .)

Mockler v. Ambach

100 Misc. 2d 717 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1979

Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233). … Since this court believes that this conduct, without more, posed a substantial "risk of harm to the agency or institution, or to the public generally” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra, p 234), the judiciary cannot

Zimmerman v. Kramer

29 Misc. 2d 413 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1961

In Sima v. Board of Stds. & Appeals ( 278 App. Div. 785 [2d Dept.]) the landowner was not joined at all; and in Perri v. Zoning Board of Appeals ( 283 App. Div. 818 [2d Dept.]); Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. … Others have clearly held that the only indispensable party defendant or respondent is the board or agency whose determination is to be reviewed (Second Ref. Church v. Board of Adjustment, 30 N. J. Super. 338; Tod v.

Rogers v. Wheeler

6 Lans. 420 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1872

Brown, agent, and directed to the plaintiffs, at Ausable Forks. … (Blossom v. Griffith, 3 Kernan, 569; Miller v. Steam Navigation Co., 10 K. Y., 431; Goold v. Chapin, 20 id., 259; Ladue v. Griffith, 25 id., 364; Fenner v. Buffalo and State Line R. R. Co., 44 id., 505; Witbeck v.

Seaman v. Drake

1 Cai. Cas. 9 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1803

Elliot v. Hay, Ibid. 334,) yet, as it will be allowed at any Vane pending the suit, and this though they be indemnified, (Browne-low v. Forbes, 2 Johns. … As to relief of hail after discharge of principal, see also, Campbell v. Palmer, 6 Cow. 596 . Cunningham v. Brown,, 5 Id. 289. Franklin v. Thurber, 1 Id. 421. Mechanics’ Bank v. Hanard, 9 Johns. Rep. 392. Post v.

Aiello v. Power

9 Misc. 2d 523 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1957

Written across these spaces, presumably by a board official, are the words, in large letters, “ Board of Elections — Transfer of Enrollment.” … (Matter of Caligiuri v. Maisel, 197 Misc. 1000 , affd. 277 App. Div. 946 , affd. 301 N. Y. 667 ; Matter of Scarfone v. Ruggieri, 197 Misc. 1007 , affd. 277 App. Div. 931 , affd. 301 N. Y. 662 .)

Flagg v. Murdock

172 Misc. 1048 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1939

(Smith v. Donahue, 202 App. Div. 656, 664 .) As distinguished from public or common schools, private schools are those supported and managed by individuals. (Jenkins v. … As to the variance sought, the court doubts if the board had power to grant it. (Young Women’s Hebrew Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 .)

Matter of First & Riv. LLC v. Board of Mgrs. of the Horizon Condominium

2024 NY Slip Op 34319(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Dec 5, 2024

LLC v Board of Mgrs. of the Horizon Condominium 2024 NY Slip Op 34319(U) December 5, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157242 … Matter of CRP/Extel 99 West Side L.P. v. 808 West End Avenue LLC supra at 2; see also Deutsche Bank Trust v. 120 Greenwich Dev. Assoc. supra at 3. Ponito Residence LLC v. 12th St.

Longobardi v. Oakley

51 Misc. 2d 424 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1966

Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 11 N Y 2d 20; Matter of Guardian Life Ins. Co. v. Bohlinger, 308 N. Y. 174 ). … Matter of Mitchell v. Prendergast, 178 App. Div. 690 , affd. 222 N. Y. 543 ; People v. Keeler, 17 N. Y. 370, 374 ).