Case law

Stevens v. Horn

40 Misc. 2d 351 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1963

(Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N. Y. 71 .) There is no real question that petitioner has shown enough to cover the second and third of these points (Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. … Y. 86 ; Matter of Taxpayer’s Assn. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 215 ; Matter of Bellamy v. Board of Appeals, 32 Misc 2d 520 ; Matter of Hickox v. Griffin, 298 N. Y. 365 ).

Gutterman Iron & Metal Corp. v. Figg Bridge Developers, L.L.C.

82 Va. Cir. 304 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · Mar 1, 2011

Brown This is a case about the removal and disposal of the Jordan Bridge. The matter is now before the Court on the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint. … See, e.g., Glazebrook v. Board of Supervisors of Spotsylvania County, 266 Va. 550, 554 , 587 S.E.2d 589, 591 (2003).

Eberle v. LaGuardia

175 Misc. 272 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1940

The board has no discretion in such cases. (Rees v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 247 N. Y. 372 ; Matter of Creveling v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 255 id. 364.) … Brady v. Martin ( 145 N. Y. 253 ); People ex rel. Hardy v. Green (37 App. Div. 589 ); Matter of McMeekan v. Dept. of Health ( 157 Misc. 620 ).

McDaniel v. 162 Columbia Heights Housing Corp.

23 Misc. 3d 784 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2009

(Matter of Jacobson v Moskowitz, 27 NY2d 67 [1970]; Matter of Coplan v Lionel Corp., 20 AD2d 301, 304 [1st Dept 1964], affd 14 NY2d 679 [1964]; Avien, Inc. v Weiss, 50 Misc 2d 127, 132-133 [Sup Ct, Queens County 1966]; see … also Matter of Gearing v Kelly, 15 AD2d 219 [1st Dept 1961], affd 11 NY2d 201 [1962].)

Zablow v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

41 Misc. 2d 803 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1964

benefit the municipality (Seif v. … Y. 84 ; Matter of Hiscox v. Holmes, 239 App. Div. 602 ; Judson v. City of Niagara Falls, 140 App. Div. 62 , affd. 204 N. Y. 630 ).

Chelnik v. Wagner

2 Misc. 2d 29 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1955

In Adamson v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co. ( 89 Hun 261, 264 ) the court said of Adamson v. Union R. R. … The latter board is not a party to this action (see Schnepel v. Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 302 N. Y. 94 ).

Roher v. Dinkins

71 Misc. 2d 739 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1972

Deits v. Hogan, 214 N. Y. 216, 229 [1915]). In Matter of Schwab v. Boyle ( 174 App. Div. 442 [1st Dept., 1916], affd. 219 N. … The only decision since Matter of Ross v. Cohen (supra), involving an interpretation of section 3 of article XIII is Matter of Howard v.

Mifflin Bridge Co. v. County of Juniata

144 Pa. 365 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County · Oct 5, 1891

Chief Justice Paxson : It was held in Montgomery Co. v. Bridge Co., 110 Pa. 54 , that where a bridge is taken by a county for public use, under the act of May 8, 1876, P. … Brown, was asked as to the value of the bridge, by which I understand to be meant the superstructure only.

Kaiser v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

170 Misc. 2d 321 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1996

Woodberry, 8 NY2d 165 [1960]; Guarino v Woodworth, 204 AD2d 391 [1994]; McGraw v Ranieri, 202 AD2d 725 [1994]; Canfield v Giles, 182 AD2d 1075 [1992]). … Corp. v City of New York, 454 US 1164 [1982]).

People v. Koenig

34 Misc. 2d 711 · New York Court of Special Session · Jun 12, 1962

I, § 12; Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 ; People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368; People v. Ryan, 14 A D 2d 926). … The papers Kelly received from these men he placed in a brown manila envelope.

Jones v. Morrill

42 Barb. 623 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1864

By the act of the legislature passed in 1860, “for the protection of boarding housekeepers” (Sess. … (Connell v. Cooke, 3 Hill, 485 .)

Saile v. Edell

96 Misc. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1916

It seems to me that a serious question is presented, however, as to the legal capacity of the town board to institute this action. Town of Hempstead v. Lawrence, 138 App. Div. 473 ; Tuma v. Piepenbrink, 77 Misc. … Irving National Bank v. Corbett, 10 Abb. N. C. 85 ; Van Zandt v. Van Zandt, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 963. The demurrer, therefore, must be overruled. Demurrer overruled.

Van Allen v. McCleary

27 Misc. 2d 81 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1961

(Schnepel v. Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 302 N. Y. 94 .) … Moreover, it has been held in Gwynne v. Board of Educ. ( 259 N.

Johnson v. Parsons

207 Misc. 107 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1954

(See Matter of Bethlehem Union Free School Dist. v. Wilson, 303 N. Y. 107 , 114 ; Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566 , supra ; Matter of Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1, Town of Somers, v. Stoddard, 49 N. Y. … Thus the statute complained of is constitutional (Matter of Board of Educ. of Bethlehem Union Free School Dist. v. Wilson, 303 N. Y. 107,114-115 , supra ; Gardner v. Ginther, 232 App. Div. 296 , affd. 257 N.

Torpey v. Williams

3 Daly 162 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1869

the tug or barge was licensed by them (Murphy v. … The Commissioners had no authorized agents on board of the tug.

Williams v. Adami

70 Misc. 2d 702 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1972

Michaelis, 22 Misc 2d 107 ; Rosenblatt v. Druck, N. Y. L. J., July 20, 1945, p. 130, col. 6). … In conclusion, the court also finds that petitioners have failed to demonstrate any unusual hardship or economic deprivation which would have justified the Board of Appeals in granting them a variance (Von Elm v.

In re Investigation of the Financial Affairs

59 Misc. 388 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1908

Village of Fort Edward v. Fish, 156 ET. V. 363. … La Canandaigua v. Hayes, 90 App.

People ex rel. Ryan v. Dalton

28 N.Y.S. 491 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Mar 15, 1894

In People v. Board of Excise (City Ct. Brook.) 16 N. Y. Supp. 798 , affirmed by court of appeals, 31 N. … If the board, had not accorded a full hearing, one might have been directed.

Hascall v. Madison University

8 Barb. 174 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1850

The case of Florence v. … the university board.

Seaman v. Drake

1 Cai. Cas. 9 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1803

Elliot v. Hay, Ibid. 334,) yet, as it will be allowed at any Vane pending the suit, and this though they be indemnified, (Browne-low v. Forbes, 2 Johns. … As to relief of hail after discharge of principal, see also, Campbell v. Palmer, 6 Cow. 596 . Cunningham v. Brown,, 5 Id. 289. Franklin v. Thurber, 1 Id. 421. Mechanics’ Bank v. Hanard, 9 Johns. Rep. 392. Post v.