Case law

Brown v. Sisti

160 Misc. 332 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1936

Brown, chairman of the Republican city committee of the city of Utica, N. Y., feeling aggrieved at Mr. … (Whitmore v. Mayor, 67 N. Y. 21 ; Ledwith v. Rosalsky, *340 244 N. Y. 406, 411 .) ” In Matter of Burke v. Cohen ( 265 N.

Owen v. Brown

78 Misc. 273 · New York County Courts · Nov 15, 1912

Co. v. Holman, 150 App. Div. 678 . … Hence the complaint is amendable under the authority of Van Clief v. Van Vechten, 130 N. Y. 571 . But see Heffron v. Jennings, 66 App.

Brown v. Rich

40 Barb. 28 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1863

mortgage instead of an execution, and the property been bid off at a sum equal to the amount due thereon, that would have satisfied and extinguished the mortgage, as to all other property covered by it, as was held in Charter v.

Brown v. Rundlett

15 N.H. 360 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1844

Brown, 12 Johns. 385 ; Macbeath vs. Haldiman, 1 Term R. 172 ; Walker vs. Swartwout, 12 Johns. 444 . It is then a question of fact, to be determined by the jury, or of law, arising upon a given or agreed state of facts. … R. 567; Brown vs. Austin, 1 Mass. 208 ; McWilliams vs. Willis, 1 Wash. 199 ; Underhill v. Gibson, 2 N. H. Rep. 352. There are cases in which the principal or the agent is liable, at the election of the creditor.

Layton v. Brown

13 Va. Cir. 542 · Virginia Circuit Court · May 10, 1920

Co. v. Gallego Mills Co., 101 Va. 579 (1903); Wallace v. Taliaferro, 6 Va. (2 Call) 447 (1800); Davis v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. (17 Gratt.) 617 (1867); Commonwealth v. Maclin, 30 Va. (3 Leigh) 809 (1831); Chadbourn v. … In State v.

Smith v. Brown

17 Pa. D. & C. 548 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Mar 7, 1932

L. 236, and further' cites the case of Sunanday v. McKently, 244 Pa, 533, where it was held that a suit for criminal conversation was not within the provisions of the Act of 1895.

Brown v. Purdy

22 Jones & S. 109 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 30, 1886

The rule and its limitations are given in Underwood v. Green ( 42 N. Y. 140 ). … These opinions led them to make an honest report to the Health Board. The statutes had made it their duty to report cases of contagious diseases.

Brown v. Heller

51 Misc. 2d 660 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1966

Such cases as Everson v. Board of Educ. ( 330 U. S. 1 ) and McCollum v. Board of Educ. ( 333 U. … A useful test in cases of this kind may be found in Two Guys v. McGinley ( 366 U. S. 582 ) which dealt with Sunday closing laws.

Brown v. Sutter

1 U.S. 239 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 15, 1788

Shippen, President, -said, in tbis case, tbat tbe court would never open a regular judgment, to let in a plea of tbe statute of limitations, (a) In Dutilh v. … Miller, 2 Bro. 311; Judge Hemphill remarked, that the authority of Brown v. Sutter remained undisturbed by any decision in the state, with which they were acquainted.

Kleinberger v. Brown

8 N.Y.S. 866 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Mar 4, 1890

In Champlin v. … This case was cited with approval in Judson v. Easton, 58 N. Y. 664 .

Brown v. Sax & Kimble

7 Cow. 94 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1827

The only question is, whether the former was entitled to the boards which the defendants made of them. We think the property was not changed by this act. … Betts v. Lee, 5 John. 338 ; Curtis v. Groat, 6 id. 168; Babcock v. Gill, 10 id. 287.

Clavell v. Brown

45 Pa. D. & C.5th 105 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Nov 25, 2014

See also Bird v. … Thompson v.

Brown v. Cook

3 N.H. 64 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · May 15, 1824

Brown v. Myers & Rathfon

145 Pa. 17 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jan 4, 1892

Justice McCollum : It appears on the face of this record that Brown was a subcontractor. … But this decision does not apply to the case of a subcontractor : Lee v. Burke, 66 Pa. 336 . The reason for the distinction is clearly stated in the case last cited, in Russell v. Bell, 44 Pa. 47 , and in Gray v.

Brown v. Van Camp

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 142 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1883

Murphy v. Kipp & Brown

1 Duer 659 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1853

Murphy, Administratrix of Murphy, v. Kipp & Brown. At Chambers, Jan., 1853.

Brown v. Citimortgage, Inc.

86 Va. Cir. 166 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jan 22, 2013

National Corporation v. Brown

12 Pa. D. & C.2d 45 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 28, 1957

He cites Mutual Loan and Savings Association v. National Surety Co., 253 Pa. 351 (1916); Yoast v. Beatty, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 219 (1899); Rothschild’s Sons’ Co. v. McLaughlin, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 612 (1900). … The case of Heyer v. Piano Co., 6 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Brown

92 Va. Cir. 353 · Dinwiddie County Circuit Court · Mar 1, 2016

See Lomax v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 168 , 319 S.E.2d 763 (1984) (abuse of discretion to deny continuance in murder case when Commonwealth delivered toxicology report “just hours before trial”); Gilchrist v. … Brown’s Mental Health Surrounding the Time of the Offense or To Bar Death Penal Due. to Mr. Brown’s Serious Mental Illness at the Time of the Offense 1 will not allow defendant to file this motion. Dr.

Brown v. Tashman

93 Va. Cir. 262 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 2, 2016

Background Ashley Brown brings this medical malpractice suit against Defendants, alleging that Dr. … Scarpa v.