Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Carlisle v. Burke

    82 Misc. 282 · New York County Courts · Oct 15, 1913

    It is well settled that the court has no power to remove a public officer for acts done prior to his present term of office (People v. Ahearn, 131 App. Div. 30 ; affd., 196 N. Y. 221 ; Conant v. Grogan, 6 N. Y. St. … Tyrrell v. Jersey City, 25 N. J.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Epoch Producing Corp. v. Davis

    19 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 465 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Apr 10, 1917

    action of the board. 6. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schiro v. Catania

    13 Misc. 2d 1033 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1957

    J., Dismissal and Nonsuit, p. 1182, n. 69; Lindheim v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 68 Hun 122 .) A defendant has the right to raise this objection. (Voron & Chait v. Benguiat, *1036 162 N. Y. S. 974, 975; C. J. … Y. v. Diamond, 1 N Y 2d 594).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Trucchio

    159 Misc. 2d 523 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1993

    County District Attorney held not to be the same party for purposes of collateral estoppel]; see also, Brown v City of New York, 60 NY2d 897 [Corporation *527 Counsel and District Attorney held not to be the same party for … Dowdy v Smith, 48 NY2d 477, 482 [District Attorney and Parole Board stand in sufficiently close relationship to permit application of doctrine of collateral estoppel]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Udell v. McFadyen

    46 Misc. 2d 804 · New York Supreme Court · May 6, 1965

    Corp. v. Horn, 16 A D 2d 973; Paliotto v. Town of Islip, 31 Misc 2d 447 ; Matter of Hyde v. Oestreich, 194 N. Y. S. 2d 374). … Corp. v. Town of Huntington, 16 A D 2d 974).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.

    7 N.Y.S. 406 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1889

    Searles, who was a member of the board of the Sugar Refineries Company, and it was transferred by him to that board. … In Stanton v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Turner

    84 Va. Cir. 406 · Staunton County Circuit Court · Apr 9, 2012

    McGhee v. Commonwealth, 280 Va. 620, 624 , 701 S.E.2d 58 (2010) (citing Jones v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 52, 59 , 688 S.E.2d 269 ). … Smith v. Ohio, 494 U.S. 541, 543 , 110 S. Ct. 1288 , 108 L. Ed. 2d 464 (1990). The Commonwealth’s arguments in defense of Brown’s conduct are not persuasive.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Guilderland v. Swanson

    41 Misc. 2d 398 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1963

    Rason Asphalt v. Town of Oyster Bay, 6 A D 2d 810.) … The grant here was completely beyond the power' of the Town Board, without a ratification at a referendum. (Cf. Paul v. Seattle, 40 Wash. 294, 300 .) In City of Princeton v. Princeton Elec.

    Modified by Town of Guilderland v. Swanson, 29 A.D.2d 717 (1968)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Falcher

    107 Misc. 2d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1980

    Woodside v Board of Inspectors of Election of 56th Election Dist. of Town of Hempstead, Assembly Dist. No. 18, Nassau County ( 88 Misc 2d 696 ). … Woodside v Board of Inspectors of Election of 56th Election Dist. of Town of Hempstead, Assembly Dist.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Drake v. City of Portland

    Superior Court of Maine · May 27, 2005

    Charlton v. Town of Oxford, 2001 ME 104, 7 27, 774 A.2d 366, 375 (citing Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161, 162 (1859)). … The leading Maine decision on the meaning of special damage is Brown v. Watson. Simmons, Zillman & Gregory, Maine Tort Law § 14.03 at 424.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sherman v. Frazier

    106 Misc. 2d 129 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1980

    empower them to do so; in Matter of Rouse v O’Connell ( 78 Misc 2d 82 ) where the town board authorized the planning board to modify zoning provisions; in Nemeroff Realty Corp. v Kerr ( 38 AD2d 437 ) where the town board … Realty Corp. v Goodman, 300 NY 140 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • S. S. Kresge Co. v. City of New York

    194 Misc. 645 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1949

    board having power to make variances and exceptions. … Vangello v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. L.A. Fitness International LLC

    16 Pa. D. & C.5th 491 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 30, 2010

    Brown v. Racquetball Centers Inc., 369 Pa. … For example, the court in Maloney v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ecology Action v. Van Cort

    99 Misc. 2d 664 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1979

    (United States v SCRAP, 412 US 669 ; Tooker v Albright, supra.) … Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222 (1974).”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McNutt v. Hilkins

    29 N.Y.S. 1047 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1894

    Morris v. Rexford, 18 N. Y. 552 ; Greton v. Smith, 33 N. Y. 245 ; Bank v. Beale, 34 N. Y. 473 ; Rodermund v. Clark, 46 N. Y. 354 . … her property until the board had been furnished, and that she was boarded for two months only.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Townshend v. Frommer

    2 N.Y.S. 703 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Jul 3, 1888

    Y. 62 ; Wetmore v. Hegeman, Id. 69 ; Browning v. Marvin, 100 N. Y. 144 , 2 N. E. Rep. 635; Fowler v. Callan, 102 N. Y. 395 , 7 N. E. Rep. 169. These cases are not-authorities for the defendants’ proposition. Moses v. … McDivitt was an action, brought by an attorney upon a bond; Wetmore v. Hegeman and Browning v. Marvin were actions on contract; while Fowler v. Callan is an authority to. some extent for the plaintiff.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Goranson v. Trans World Airlines

    121 Misc. 2d 68 · White Plains City Court · Sep 12, 1983

    Later claimants, however, were not so successful in obtaining exemplary damage awards once the CAB approved bumping and issued priority rules as to boarding. (See Karp v North Cent. … The Nader v Allegheny matter returned to the Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia in 1980 {Nader v Allegheny Airlines, 626 F2d 1031). By this time the Civil Aeronautics Board had changed its regulations.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dime Savings Bank of Hartford v. Gatter

    11 Conn. Supp. 419 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Feb 8, 1943

    Its real estate committee, its executive committee and its board of directors, all approved the sale on that, and no other, basis. … Burns & Smith Lumber Co. v. Doyle, 71 Conn. 742, 745 , 43 Atl. 483 ; Fernandez vs. Thompson, 104 Conn. 366, 369 , 132 Atl. 895 ; Siller vs. Philip, 107 Conn. 612, 620 , 141 Atl. 872 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Orr v. Cleveland School (Bd. of Ed.) Dist.

    34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 140 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Jul 2, 1912

    Thus in Gates v. … .” *145 In Pace v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Heydeman v. County of Rockland

    206 Misc. 473 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1954

    (See Daly v. Haight, 163 App. Div. 234 ; Osterhoudt v. Board of Supervisors, 98 N. Y. 239 ; McNeil v. Board of Supervisors, 123 App. Div. 622 ; Burns v. City of Watertown, 126 Misc. 140 ; Bush v. Coler, 60 App. … Y. 587 ; Bush v. O’Brien, 164 N. Y. 205 , and Jensen v. Board of Contract & Supply of City of Schenectady, 74 Misc. 641 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.