Case law

Mullooly v. Union Free School District No. 8

20 Misc. 2d 795 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1959

While Matter of Flinn v. Board of Educ. (154 N. Y. … Nothing therein prevents the board, if its action is otherwise validly taken under section 2007 or section 2008 (cf. Matter of Flinn v. Board of Educ., 155 N. Y.

Gorfinkel v. Allen

58 Misc. 2d 43 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1968

(Matter of Gimprich v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 306 N. Y. 401 .) … (Matter of Izzo v. Kirby, 56 Misc 2d 131 .) The above renders unnecessary a discussion of whether or not all necessary parties have joined in this proceeding. Submit judgment dismissing petition.

New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v. Any-Time Home Care, Inc.

New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 2018

The following actions remain pending against them in this Court: (a) the CRM Individuals are defendants in New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v Compensation Risk Mgrs., LLC (Index No. 10288-09 [" CRM Action"]); (b) … v Compensation Risk Managers Agency, Captive, LLC (Index No. 5966-09 ["Member [*2] Action"]), a suit brought by certain former members of HITNY.

People ex rel. Hunter v. Bara

144 Misc. 2d 750 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1989

(Board of Pardons v Allen, supra, at 375.) If the Parole Board fails to comply with the statutory due process protection, the parole candidate is entitled to a new hearing rather than a habeas corpus relief. … (See, Board of Pardons v Allen, supra; Greenholtz v Nebraska Penal Inmates, supra.)

People ex rel. Johnson v. Follette

58 Misc. 2d 474 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1968

Combs v. … But whatever the board’s determination may be on the merits, it must be arrived at according to law (Matter of Hines v. State Bd. of Parole, supra, p. 257).

Lakeville Village v. Palmer

74 Ohio Law. Abs. 45 · Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 20, 1955

Kahle v. … The case of County Board of Education of Putnam County et al v.

Alter v. New York State Department of Health

145 Misc. 2d 393 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1989

(Matter of Levin v Murawski, 59 NY2d 35 .) … (Matter of Levin v Guest, 112 AD2d 830 , affd 67 NY2d 629 .)

In re the Estate of Mellett

108 N.J. Super. 181 · Hudson County Superior Court · Dec 19, 1969

[Apgar v. Hoffman, 113 N. J. Eq. 233, 237 (Prerog., Ct., 1933)]. … McCauley for letters of administration, is denied and the letters are granted to Helen Brown and Josephine DeGregory.

State Bank v. Bell

197 Misc. 97 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1949

(Kuhn v. Knight, 190 N. Y. 339 ; People v. Luhrs, 195 N. Y. 377 ; Mayor of City of N. Y. v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 143 N. Y. 1 .) … Div. 285 ; Matter of Erlanger v. Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 256 App. Div. 444 ; Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65 ; Matter of Marburg v. Cole, 286 N. Y. 202 ; Matter of Firshein v. Reavy, 263 App.

State v. Aronson

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 49 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jan 23, 1991

State v Brown, 527 So.2d 209, 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 18988), quoting from State v Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605, 611, 612 , (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). … State v Brown, 527 So.2d at 210 , quoted in Birken v Scheer, 543 So.2d at 332 .

Ferdon v. Rogers

43 Misc. 2d 676 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1964

On the same day, respondents adopted a resolution which rescinded the action of the Board of Trustees taken on January 29, 1963 approving the use of Lot 14 for an off-street parking lot. … The State Legislature by passing chapter 897 of the Laws of 1963 has certified that all requisite steps necessary for the passage of the law in question were properly carried out (see Whalen v.

Wilcox v. Wilcox

48 Barb. 327 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1867

Ho agreement for board is proved; and without an express agreement to pay for board no legal claim arose, and none should be recognized or allowed, under such circumstances. The case of Robinson v. … (Henderson v. Eason, 9 Eng. L. and Eq. 339. Woolever v. Knapp, 18 Barb. 265 . Dresser v. Dresser, 40 id. 300 .) [Monroe General Term, March 4, 1867. It appears that on the decease of the father of Mrs.

People ex rel. Drake v. Common Council of City of Syracuse

26 Misc. 522 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1899

Cor *526 rigan v. Mayor, 149 N. Y. 215 . Neither are any allegations in the moving papers to be considered which are of mere conclusions of law. People ex rel. Corrigan v. Mayor, 149 N. Y. 223 . … Hoyt v. Trustees, 19 App. Div. 567 .

Slater v. Kenny

176 Misc. 690 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1941

When practically the same question as in the Berry case came before the First Department again (Brown v. Brown, 153 App. … (Tiedemann v.

Brandt v. City of New York

172 Misc. 988 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1940

Allusion is made to Matter of Becker v. Eisner ( 277 N. Y. 143 ). … Electric Lines Co. v. Squire ( 107 N. Y. 593 ; affd., 145 U. S. 175 ) is pertinent.

In re Buckley

183 Misc. 189 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1944

The by-law in question sought merely to prevent the directors from removing the Chairman of the Board without■ cause. In Clark v. Dodge ( 269 N. … The gist of the holding in Clark v.

Rothermel v. Meyerle

136 Pa. 250 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Oct 6, 1890

No state has power to make any law which will affect the free and unrestricted intercourse and trade between the states: Brown v. Houston, supra. In Welton v. Missouri, 91 U. … In Brown v.

People v. Bankers' Loan & Investment Co.

34 N.Y.S. 235 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 27, 1895

submitted for decision is whether the board had authority for the act Unquestionably, a board of directors has no power to reduce the capital stock of a corporation, as fixed by its constitution. … Railroad Co. v. Schuyler, 34 N. Y. 30 ; Sutherland v. Olcott, 95 N. Y. 93 ; Railway Co. v. Allerton, 18 Wall 233, 234.

McCabe v. City of New York

170 Misc. 325 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1939

(Citing Matter of Towers Management Corporation v. Thatcher, 271 N. Y. 94 .).” … (Citing Matter of Leone v. Brewer, 259 N. Y. 386 .) ” Defendant, in advancing the above argument, apparently overlooks the basic issue involved.

Timpano v. Hanna

77 Misc. 2d 874 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1974

(Matter of Collins v. City of Schenectady, 256 App. Div. 389 .) Thus, a municipal corporation may, unless restricted by its charter or other statute, abolish an office created by ordinance. (Matter of Collins v. … (Matter of Collins v. City of Schenectady, supra; see, also, Anker v. Dibble, 236 App. Div. 613 .)