Case law

Peckham Industries, Inc. v. Ross

60 Misc. 2d 566 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1969

Petitioner had its option to review “ any decision” of the Planning Board under either section 282 or section 267 (subd. 7) of the Town Law. (See Matter of Walton v. Town of Brookhaven, 41 Misc 2d 798 .) … (See Matter of Mahopac Isle v. Agar, 39 Misc 2d 1 .) It should be noted that this holding is in accord with Matter of Castaways Motel v.

Hernandez v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

35 Pa. D. & C.3d 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 20, 1984

For example, in Jones v. … Defendant further argues that the courts have, in most instances where claims such as retaliatory or wrongful discharge arise, deferred to the jurisdiction of the National Railroad Board. Andrews v.

Schulz v. Cermak

1 Misc. 2d 1063 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1956

Further, they are ‘ ‘ public officers ’ ’ as defined in Rowland v. Mayor ( 83 N. … R. 792; see, also, McMaster v. Gould, 240 N. Y. 379, 384 .)

L.S. Village, Inc. v. Lawrence Township

8 N.J. Tax 287 · New Jersey Superior Court · Jun 6, 1985

Stores Co. v. … See Kozlowski v.

Kirschner v. K&L Gates LLP

20 Pa. D. & C.5th 129 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Dec 28, 2010

In 2010 in Marion v. … Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1350 (7th Cir. 1983).

Moll v. City of Lockport

118 Misc. 573 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1922

As to the general authority of said board and the propriety, reasonableness and constitutionality of said resolution I believe myself bound by the unreported opinion of Justice Morschauser in People ex rel. Ogden v. … Henry v. Nostrand, 46 N. Y. 375 ; Vermilyea v. Palmer, 52 id. 471 ; People ex rel. Howlett v. Mayor, 63 id. 291, and the opinion in Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Mahle, 72 Misc. Rep. 129 ; revd., 158 App. Div. 889 .

Faranda v. Schoepflin

39 Misc. 2d 400 · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 1963

V, § C-3) and aggregate side yards of 25 feet but not less than 10 feet on either side (art. V, § C-7). The two lots in question each measure 20 by 100 feet, and have a total area of 4,000 square feet. … (Matter of Franmor Realty Corp. v. Le Boeuf, 279 App. Div. 795 ; Marshak v. City of Long Beach, 278 App. Div. 966 .)

Brewster v. Wooster

9 N.Y.S. 312 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Mar 4, 1890

Under the agreements between the defendant and Brown, Brewster, and Bateman, the defendant was under no obligation to convey to the said Brown, Brewster, and Bateman the property mentioned in the agreements until each of … the contract, (Nelson v.

Landman v. Sauerston

34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 706 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Mar 29, 1915

Cas. 779]; National Bank of Commerce v. Garn, 13-23 O. C. C. 447 (3 N. S. 428). … Counsel for the defendants in error also relies on Wolf v. Shillito & Co., 9 Dec.

In re Pittsburgh Citizen Police Review Board

16 Pa. D. & C.5th 435 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Sep 23, 2010

See Huntley & Huntley Inc. v. … Also see Spahn v.

Lidakis v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

27 Misc. 3d 1150 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2010

New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760 [1996]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … (See Morley v Arricale, 66 NY2d 665 [1985]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354 [1979]; Pell at 230-232.)

Weissman v. Mogol

118 Misc. 2d 911 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1983

board at the polls.” … (Matter of Bott v Board of Educ., 41 NY2d 265 , 268.) In fact, such a hearing is the exclusive method for dismissal of a tenured teacher. (Matter of Lynch v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 588 .)

Lush v. Commissioner of Education

16 Misc. 2d 137 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1957

Justice Halpern’s statement is apposite (Matter of O’Brien v. … Act, § 1295; Matter of Arcuri v. Macduff, 286 App. Div. 17 and the cases there cited) .

Bay Ferries, LTD. v. Board of Commissioners for the Port of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 1, 2018

The Board has a duty to determine that the pilotage rate is neither unreasonably low nor unreasonably high. See Indus. Energy Consumer Grp. v. Public Utils. … While the Pilots are correct that the Board is entitled to a presumption of regularity, see Conservation Law Found v. Dep 't ofEnvtl.

People v. Newsome

52 Misc. 2d 178 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1966

(See, also, People v. Troche, 9 Misc 2d 452 .) The preamble in Klein v. People ( 31 N. … People v. Moshell, 287 N. Y. 9 .)

Walsh v. Scanlon

3 Misc. 3d 254 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 2004

“Courts have consistently held that a union’s ‘interpretation of its own constitution is entitled to “great deference” and will be upheld unless “patently unreasonable.” ’ ” (Brodsky v Union Local 306, 1999 WL 102763 , *3 … In view thereof, the interpretation that the Association gives is not “patently unreasonable” (see Sim v New York Mailers’ Union No. 6, 166 F3d 465 , 470 [2d Cir 1999]), and deference must be given to that interpretation.

Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital v. Spitzer

186 Misc. 2d 126 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1999

(Manhattan Theatre Club v Bohemian Benevolent & Literary Assn., 120 Misc 2d 1094, 1097 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983], quoting Church of God v Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist, 76 AD2d 712, 717 .) … (Rose Ocko Found, v Lebovits, 259 AD2d 685, 688 [2d Dept 1999], citing Church of God v Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist, 76 AD2d, supra, at 716; Wolkoff v Church of St. Rita, 132 Misc 2d 464, 467 , supra.)

Winter v. Bernstein

149 Misc. 2d 1017 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1991

(See, Gordon v Elliman, 306 NY 456, 459 [1954]; United States Trust Co. v Heye, 224 NY 242 [1918]; Kranich v Bach, supra; Nauss v Nauss Bros. … (See, Gordon v Elliman, supra; Bender v Ferro, 86 AD2d 12 [1st Dept 1982].)

Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane Society

20 Misc. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1897

Health Department v. Rector, etc., 145 N. Y. 32 ; Lawton v. Steele, 119 id. 226; People v. West, 106 id. 293; People v. Havnor, 149 id. 195. … Trustees of Exempt Firemen’s Fund v. Roome, 93 N. Y. 313 . See Board of Underwriters v. Whipple & Co., 2 App. Div. 361 .

Chevere v. City of New York

31 Misc. 3d 337 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 2010

Headley v City of Rochester, 272 NY 197, 201 (1936). . Ward v Bennett, 79 NY2d at 401 . . Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … Matter of County of Monroe v Kaladjian, 83 NY2d 185, 189 (1994); see also Matter of Heintz v Brown, 80 NY2d 998, 1001 (1992). . Matter of County of Monroe v Kaladjian, 83 NY2d at 189 . .