Case law

Page v. McConville

10 Ohio C.C. 316 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

Hinkle, attorney for Doane and Brown. We think this case differs essentially from that relied upon by the counsel for plaintiff in error, Wangerien et al. v. Aspell et al., 47 Ohio St. 250 . … We consider it to be the law of this state as settled in the cases of Smithers v. Rainey, 14 Ohio St. 287 ; Jones v. March, 80 Ohio St. 20 , and Burke v.

Fishman v. Arnzen

52 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1966

proceedings in review of the board’s probably negative action. … The hearing is mandatory following submission of a properly processed plat (Matter of Scarsdale Meadows v. Smith, 20 A D 2d 906; Town Law, § 276, subd. 4).

Living Resources Corp. v. Burns

91 Misc. 2d 919 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1977

from Decision of an Administrative Official” form; and (2) the petition fails to state a cause of action because it does not request a variance from the Colonie town zoning board of appeals, and the town zoning board of … On the substantive issue, the court finds consistent with prevailing New York law (see City of White Plains v Ferraioli, 34 NY2d 300, 306 ; Matter of Moore v Nowakowski, 46 AD2d 996 ; Shannon v Flynn, Rensselaer County, March

Commonwealth v. Pacheco

93 Va. Cir. 68 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · Mar 15, 2016

Brown v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 512, 517 , 158 S.E.2d 663, 667 (1968) (quoting 29 Am. Jur. 2d, Evidence, § 330 (1960)). … See, e.g., Herron v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 326, 327 , 157 S.E.2d 195, 196 (1967); Brown, 208 Va. at 516-17 , 158 S.E.2d at 667 ; Ryan, 219 Va. at 447 , 247 S.E.2d at 703-04 ; Moore v.

Limitone v. Galgano

21 Misc. 2d 376 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1959

The answer and accompanying affidavit of the respondent board indicate that after investigation made by the board, they had received reports that petitioners had not rendered satisfactory service in connection with a garbage … The general presumption is that public officials, as well as boards, act honestly and in accordance with law (Matter of Magnotta v. Gerlach, 301 N. Y. 143, 149 ).

Guarneros v. Green 286 Madison, LLC

6 Misc. 3d 704 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2004

(Browne v Pikula, 256 AD2d 1139 [4th Dept 1998]; Creative Inception v Andrews, 50 AD2d 553 [1st Dept 1975].) … (Figliomeni v Board of Educ., 38 NY2d 178, 182 [1975]; see e.g., Zinman v Church Charity Found, of *709 Long Is., 175 AD2d 833 [2d Dept 1991]; Hogue v Wilson, 51 AD2d 424 [4th Dept 1976].)

Ohio Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Communications Workers

83 Ohio Law. Abs. 353 · Clinton County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 6, 1959

This Resolution also was adopted at the Special Meeting of Board of Directors on June 16, 1958. … To all of which, the several Defendants, by counsel, except. *372 OHIO CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA (AFL-CIO) et, Defendants. No. 18270.

Weisenberg v. Dodd

74 Misc. 2d 311 · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1973

In Matter of Panzer v. … In Matter of Freeman v.

Brand v. Goodwin

24 N.Y. St. Rep. 305 · City of New York Municipal Court · Feb 6, 1889

Browne, J. … The board of directors of the company are inferentially the board referred to in the notice of discharge.

McKenzie v. L'Amoureux

11 Barb. 516 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1851

(Brown v. Rickets, 3 John. Ch. 553. Thompson v. Brown, 4 Id. 619. See also Ross v. Crary, 1 Paige, 416 . Hallett v. Hallett, 2 Id. 15. Cooper's Eq. Pl. 39, 40.)

Adams v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton Beach

71 Misc. 2d 579 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1972

Matter of Eriksen v. Commerdinger, 24 A D 2d 934). The first of these cases sought a variance in view of the fact that the subdivided lot did not meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. … The issues are discussed .at length in Matter of Fullam v. Kronman ( 51 Misc 2d 1079 , affd. 31 A D 2d 947, affd. 26 N Y 2d 725).

New York University v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission

201 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1951

In Wilson v. … In Taylor v.

Beers v. Nyquist

72 Misc. 2d 210 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1972

Griffin v. Lathrop, 142 N. … Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Finley, 211 N.

Cady v. McDowell

1 Lans. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

(Lyon v. Smith 1 Morris, 184 .) … What was decided in Jones v.

People ex rel. Madden v. Barr

143 Misc. 716 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1932

Newton v. Twombly, 228 N. Y. 33 ).” (People ex rel. Cecere v. Jennings, supra.) … (People v. Burns, supra.)

Corsall v. Gover

10 Misc. 2d 664 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1958

Hoefle v. Cahill ( 188 N. … He is an employee of the board. His employment is contractual. He is subject to such reasonable regulations as the board may adopt. (People ex rel. Patterson v. Board of Educ. of City of Syracuse, 269 App.

Peters v. Parkhouse

36 Pa. D. & C.2d 527 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 26, 1965

v. … In Moore v.

Jones v. Bradner

10 Barb. 193 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1850

In the case of Craven et al. v. Ryder, (6 Taunt. 433,) the plaintiffs had contracted to sell certain goods upon credit, which were to be placed on board a ship for Hamburg. … In Goodyear v. Ogden, ( 4 Hill, 104 ,) and Dawson v. Kittle, (Id. 107,) the rule was carried farther than it has been in this case.

McCarthy v. LaGuardia

172 Misc. 260 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1939

(Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrick, 279 N. Y. 246 ; Matter of Hetherington v. McGoldrick , Id. 687; Matter of Rosenthal v. McGoldrick , Id. 688.) … In Matter of Rushford v.

Rochester Transit Corp. v. Crowley

205 Misc. 933 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1954

(Matter of Young Women’s Hebrew Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 ; Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards '& Appeals of City of N. Y., 290 N. Y. 109,115 ; Matter of Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App. … (Matter of Young Women’s Hebrew Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 , supra; Matter of Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App. Div. 348 , supra.) The determination of the board of appeals is affirmed.