Case law

Romig v. Weld

194 Misc. 783 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1949

Bank v. Zoning Appeals Board, supra; Olp v. Town of Brighton, 173 Misc. 1079 , affd. 262 App. Div. 944 ). … (See Holy Sepulchre Cemetery v. Town of Greece, 273 App. Div. 942 , especially opinion by Gilbert, J. [ 191 Misc. 241 ] ; Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 263 App.

de Agostina v. Parkshire Ridge Amusements, Inc.

155 Misc. 518 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1935

As was said by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. Maryland ( 12 Wheat. 419, 439 ; 6 L. Ed. 678 ): “ Questions of power do not depend on the degree to which it may be exercised. … In Darweger v.

International Railway Co. v. Boland

169 Misc. 926 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1939

Gilson v. Gibbons, 231 N. Y. 171, at p. 177 .) The application of that principle of law would require, without further argument, a reversal of the decision of the board in this case. … (Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. —, at p. 22.)

Reich v. Bosco

21 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1959

Y. 59, 62 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Elections, 196 Misc. 109 .) … (See Election Law, §§ 272-276; Matter of Ingamells v. Board of Elections, 259 App. Div. 36, 41 . See, also, Matter of Ginsberg v. Heffernan, 186 Misc. 1029,1034 ; Matter of Mazzotti v. Sewezey, 199 Misc. 987 .)

In re Burning

137 Misc. 173 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1930

proceedings were taken by the defendant by way of mandamus to compel the superintendent of buildings to cancel his revocation of the permit, which motion was denied, and the denial affirmed by the Appellate Division (Redden v. … The petitioner refers, as the authority that section 24(a) is ehminated from the zoning resolution, to Matter of Fox Lane Corporation v. Mann (216 App. Biv. 813) and Fox Lane Corporation v. Moore (Id. 813; affd., 243 N.

Barnett v. Walker

39 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1902

Williams v. Merle, 11 Wend. 80 ; Ely v. Ehle, 3 N. Y. 509 ; Everett v. Coffin, 6 Wend. 603 ; Everett v. Saltus, 15 id. 474, and same case on error, 20 id. 269. … Wyckoff v. Southern Hotel Co., 24 Mo. App. 382 ; McClain v. Williams, 11 S. Dak. 227.

Union Wine Co. v. Green

62 Misc. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1909

Brown and Otto W. Brown, doing business under the style and name of Union Wine Company.” … Demurrer sustained, with leave to plaintiff to amend v/ithin twenty days, with costs to defendant to abide event.

Gray v. Ward

74 Misc. 2d 50 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1973

In so finding it specifically rejected the holding of Schantz v. Rachlin (supra), and followed instead the Ohio court, which in Samsa v. … In Town of Harvard v. Maxant (supra, p. 351 ) the court quotes a discussion which is contained in the case of Lawrence v.

Syracuse Television, Inc. v. Channel 9, Syracuse, Inc.

51 Misc. 2d 188 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1966

The failure to sue must be the result of a breach of duty on the part of the board of directors, not merely an error of judgment. (Koral v. Savory, Inc., supra; J. C. F. Holding Corp. v. General Gas & Elec. … The refusal may be implied by the actions of the board. (Kavanaugh v. Commonwealth Trust Co., 45 Misc. 295 , affd. 103 App. Div. 95 .)

Savacool v. Boughton

5 Wend. 170 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1830

The cases of Smilh v. Shaw, 12 Johns. R. 257, and Suydam & Wyckoff v. … I find still greater difficulty in reconciling the case of Suydam & Wickoff v. Keys with that of Beach v. Furman, 9 Johns. R. 229.

McMillan v. Notre Dame Residence Club, Inc.

33 Misc. 2d 948 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1962

This case is to be distinguished from Baker v. … Field, supra; Baker v. Matthews, supra).

Evans v. Meisser

31 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1961

Law provides the sole remedy in a situation such as this or whether petitioner’s signature to the Evans-Ewald petition estops hi in from making his present application, the court holds that the *330 determination of the Board

Schesch v. State

65 Misc. 2d 44 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1970

Where the reason for the relocation was for the purpose of obtaining Federal highway funds, such was held to be consistent with and in fulfillment of the purpose of section 85 of the Highway Law (Matter of Brown v. … The concurring opinion in Matter of Brown v.

Hyatt v. Taylor

51 Barb. 632 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1868

The People v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 John. 357 -394. Stone v. The Mayor of New York, 25 Wend. 157 , 177, and following. James v. Patten, 2 Seld. 10. Post v. President. Utica Bank, 7 Hill, 407 , 408. Waller v. … McClaskey v. Cromwell, 1 Kern. 601. People v. Cowles, 3 id. 360.)

Parrish v. Moss

200 Misc. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1951

Peixotto v. Board of Education ( 212 N. … law. ’ ’ So, also, in Matter of Shapiro v.

Simmons v. Pinsky

185 Misc. 549 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1945

Rice v. Van Vranken, supra, and cases therein cited). … Div. 179 , supra, citing Empire City Subway Co. v. B. & S. A. R. R. Co., 87 Hun 279 , affd. 159 N. Y. 555 , and Atkins v. West, 222 App. Div. 308 ; cf. N. Y. Cement Co. v. C. R. Cement Co., 178 N. Y. 167 ).

Smith v. Helbraun

38 Misc. 2d 136 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1963

Underhill v. Skinner ( 74 App. … with the board (cf.

Freligh v. Brink

30 Barb. 144 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1858

Brown, J. … Brown, Justice.]

Radzievich Economy Markets, Inc.

11 Pa. D. & C.2d 669 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Jun 3, 1957

In the recent case of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … Justice Stern, in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

People v. Cropper

170 Misc. 2d 631 · New York County Courts · Nov 22, 1996

US 386 [1798]; Doe v Pataki, supra, at 605; People v Afrika, 168 Misc 2d 618 [Sup Ct, Monroe County 1996]). … Pataki, supra, at 630; People v Afrika, supra).