Case law

Park v. Cowan

102 Misc. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1918

It was entirely open and above board. … Guy v. Craighead, *400 40 App. Div. 260 ; Kain v. Larkin, 131 N. Y. 300 ; Kalish v. Higgins, 70 App. Div. 192 .

Esdora Realty Corp. v. Walsh

136 Misc. 476 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1930

Werner v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 635 ; affd., 240 N. Y. 689 ; People ex rel. Falkenau & Hammershlag, Inc., v. Walsh, Id. 688, affg. 214 App. Div. 705 .) … Cotton v. Leo ( 110 Misc. 519 ): “ The board cannot wholly disregard the provisions of the statute or of the regulations.

Council of New York v. Giuliani

183 Misc. 2d 799 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1999

Co. v Gliedman, 57 NY2d 588, 597 ; Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 451, 459 ). … Y. v Giuliani (supra).

People ex rel. Stepski v. Harford

174 Misc. 1082 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1940

Nechamcus v. Warden ( 144 N. Y. 529 ). … The Nechamcus case was followed in Matter of Chapin v. Hogan ( 208 App. Div. 56 ).

Neff v. Falk

19 Misc. 2d 83 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1959

(Ferraiolo v. O’Dwyer, 302 N. Y. 371 , motion for reargument. denied 302 N. Y. 841 ; Matter of Rosenbluth v. Finkelstein, 300 N. Y. 402 ; Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New York, 293 N. … (Roosevelt v. Draper, 23 N. Y. 318, 329 ; Murray v. City of New York, 60 App. Div. 541, 544 ; People ex rel. Tate v. Dalton, 34 App. Div. 6 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Stadium & Mem.

Scott v. Lilienthal

9 Bosw. 224 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1862

Brown to state what, in his judgment, the plaintiff’s services were worth is not well taken. … (Clark v. Baird, 5 Seld., 183, and cases there cited; Page v. Hazard, 5 Hill, 603 ; Lamoure v. Caryl, 4 Denio, 370 ; Harris v. The Panama R. R. Co., 3 Bosw., 7 .)

Hough v. Meyer

55 Pa. D. & C.4th 473 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County · Mar 26, 2002

Dorfman v. Pennsylvania Social Services Union —Local 668 of the Service Employees International Union, 752 A.2d 933 (Pa. Commw. 2000); Turner v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 749 A.2d 1018 (Pa. … However, in 1996 in Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 449 Pa. Super. 667 , 674 A.2d 1130 (1996), and again in 2001, in Shumosky v.

Kwiatkowski v. Ithaca College

82 Misc. 2d 43 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1975

An appeal was taken and the appeal board upheld the hearing board’s decision. … Petitioner was not accorded those rights for respondent refused to allow petitioner or his representative to appear before the appeal board. (Matter of Ryan v Hofstra Univ., 67 Misc 2d 651, 672 .)

Dour v. Village of Port Jefferson

89 Misc. 2d 146 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1976

Corp. v Board of Educ., 7 NY 2d 381 ; Vanderweghe v City of New York, 150 Misc 815 , affd 242 App Div 762 ; People ex rel. Patterson v Board of Educ., 269 App Div 39 , mod 295 NY 313 ). … Mershon v Shaw, 34 App Div 61 ).

Albrecht v. Queens County

32 N.Y.S. 473 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

Lane v. Town of Hancock, 142 N. Y. 510 , 37 N. E. 473 . The theory on which cities and villages were first held liable for defects in highways is stated in Conrad v. Trustees of Ithaca, 16 N. Y. 158 , and Weet v. … Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N. Y. 222 ; Supervisors v. Briggs, 2 Denio, 26 ; People v. Supervisors of Delaware Co., 45 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Barnes, 114 N. Y. 317 , 20 N. E. 609 , and 21 N. E. 739 .

People v. Parmes

114 Misc. 2d 503 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1982

(See People v Casassa, 49 NY2d 668 .) … (People v Borrero, 19 NY2d 332 .) The rule is the same where a defendant is under the influence of drugs at the time a crime is committed. (People v Brown, 57 AD2d 869 .)

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Conzo

169 Misc. 268 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1938

(Brown v. Brown, 91 Misc. 220 ; Bergstrom v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co., 171 App. Div. 776 .) … In Miller v. Campbell ( 173 App.

Wright v. Shanahan

16 N.Y.S. 785 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1891

People v. Board, 55 N. Y. 393 ; Adsit v. Brady, 4 Hill, 630 . Judge Bronson, speaking for the court in Adsit v. … See Robinson v. Chamberlain, 34 N. Y. 389 .

Anonymous—In re Notice of Intention to Appeal

20 Ohio C.C. 702 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1897

In Moore v. Brown, 10 Ohio, 197, it was held that the omission to enter notice at the term at which the judgment was entered could not be cured by a nunc pro tunc order of a subsequent term. … The statute, section 5227, Revised Statutes, now requires the notice to be entered within three days,and so far as this question is concerned, that is the only difference, so that Moore v. Brown, supra, controls.

Briggs v. Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · May 15, 2015

In Brown v. … This court is unable to reconcile Paradis with Brown.

Jensen v. Republic Steel Corp.

32 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jul 1, 1940

See Brown & Stewart v United States Board & Paper Company (Hamilton Circuit Court, 1900), 11 O. C. D. 102; Kern v Kraus Plumbing & Heating Company, 12 Oh Ap 55, 31 C. C. … See Brown & Stewart v United States Board & Paper Co., 11 O. C. D. 102; Kern v Krause Plumbing & Heating Co., 12 Oh Ap 55; 31 C. C. (N.S.) 42 (1919); Kleybolte v Railroad Co., Hosea 38 aff’d 18 O.

Bella Vista Apartment Co. v. Bennett

154 Misc. 2d 579 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1992

Respondents rely on two unreported nisi prius cases, Bromberg v Board of Estimate (NY County, Mar. 12, 1986 [index No. 20856/85]) and 80-81 First Assocs. v Board of Stds. & Appeals (NY County, Apr. 1, 1991 [index No. 5262 … (Butler v Frontier Tel.

Hopewell Gardens, Inc. v. Town of East Fishkill

76 Misc. 2d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1973

It is the view that was adopted in Old Farm Road v. … To the same effect are the decisions in Pichel v. Wells (38 A D 2d 632); Elkhart v. 490 West End Ave. Co. (38 A D 2d 1); Rose v.

Guy v. West Virginia Department of Education

26 Ct. Cl. 115 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 12, 2007

, when the respondent failed to allocate a supplemental appropriation proportionately to county boards of education in the 2004 fiscal year as provided by statute. … Award to the Board of Education of the County of Monroe in the amount of $112,571.38.

Schnell Tool & Die Corp. v. United Steelworkers

94 Ohio Law. Abs. 231 · Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 13, 1964

In Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U. S., 424 ,10 L. … Counsel for tbe Plaintiffs has cited the case of Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U. S., 1 , 1 L. Ed (2d), 601.