Case law

People ex rel. Haupt v. Lasch

122 Misc. 223 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1924

Clark v. Warden of Sing Sing Prison, 39 Misc. Rep. 113 ) which has not expired. … Corkran v. Hyatt, 172 N. Y. 176, 194-202 .

Spinosa v. Ackerman

98 Misc. 2d 1073 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1979

56 AD2d 652 ; Brachfeld v Sforza, 114 NYS2d 722 ; Stanley v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Piermont, 168 Misc 797 ). 4 In the arguments before this court and in their papers submitted, counsel for both parties now agree that … In Matter of Boxer v Town Bd. of Town of Cortlandt ( 60 AD2d 913 ), a planning board approved an application for site plan approval but the town board denied it.

Sokoloff v. National City Bank

130 Misc. 66 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1927

The defendant’s counsel relies upon the case of Myers v. Brown ( 142 App. Div. 658 ; affd., 206 N. Y. 718 ). … Brown.

Cady v. McDowell

1 Lans. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

(Lyon v. Smith 1 Morris, 184 .) … What was decided in Jones v.

Nemetty v. Naylor

11 Daly 129 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 5, 1882

Y. 83 ; Brown v. Gallaudet, 80 N. Y. 413 ; Morgan v. Powers, 66 Barb. 35 ). This principle, however, has not sufficient scope to control the case at bar. … The judgment established the allegations in the affidavit needful to sustain the landlord’s right of possession, and among them was the lease set forth (Brown v. The Mayor, &c., 66 N. Y. 385 ; Grates v. Preston, 41 N.

Wheeler v. M'Farland

10 Wend. 318 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1833

In the case of Moore v. … Ingersoll v.

Park v. Cowan

102 Misc. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1918

It was entirely open and above board. … Guy v. Craighead, *400 40 App. Div. 260 ; Kain v. Larkin, 131 N. Y. 300 ; Kalish v. Higgins, 70 App. Div. 192 .

Jensen v. Republic Steel Corp.

32 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jul 1, 1940

See Brown & Stewart v United States Board & Paper Company (Hamilton Circuit Court, 1900), 11 O. C. D. 102; Kern v Kraus Plumbing & Heating Company, 12 Oh Ap 55, 31 C. C. … See Brown & Stewart v United States Board & Paper Co., 11 O. C. D. 102; Kern v Krause Plumbing & Heating Co., 12 Oh Ap 55; 31 C. C. (N.S.) 42 (1919); Kleybolte v Railroad Co., Hosea 38 aff’d 18 O.

Lisenenkov v. Kaszirer

13 Misc. 3d 1184 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2006

see also, Costa v District Nursing Assn. of N. … Corp. v Geoffrion, 193 AD2d 1007 [3d Dept 1993]; Gindi v Intertrade Intl., Ltd., 12 Misc 3d 1182[A] , 2006 NY Slip Op 51380[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2006]).

Reich v. Bosco

21 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1959

Y. 59, 62 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Elections, 196 Misc. 109 .) … (See Election Law, §§ 272-276; Matter of Ingamells v. Board of Elections, 259 App. Div. 36, 41 . See, also, Matter of Ginsberg v. Heffernan, 186 Misc. 1029,1034 ; Matter of Mazzotti v. Sewezey, 199 Misc. 987 .)

Savacool v. Boughton

5 Wend. 170 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1830

The cases of Smilh v. Shaw, 12 Johns. R. 257, and Suydam & Wyckoff v. … I find still greater difficulty in reconciling the case of Suydam & Wickoff v. Keys with that of Beach v. Furman, 9 Johns. R. 229.

Tamburro v. Mills

33 Pa. D. & C.5th 501 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 23, 2013

Chen v. Chen, 893 A.2d 87 (Pa. 2006); Hicks v. Saboe, 555 A.2d 1241 (Pa. 1989); Pa. Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc., 371 A.2d 178 (Pa. 1976); Steffy & Son, Inc. v. Citizens Bank, 7 A.3d 278 (Pa. … See also, Hatbob v. Brown, 575 A.2d 607 (Pa. Superior Ct. 1990), nonsuit affirmed when no evidence was introduced to indicate that attorney did not carry out intent of testator.

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Comerchero

34 Misc. 2d 52 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1962

Corp. v. Brown, 15 A D 2d 578). Eespondent further argues that, even assuming the merit of petitioner’s contentions, such issues are determinable by the arbitrators rather than by the court. … Corp. v. Brown, supra; see, also, Matter of Travelers Ind. Co. [Melcher], N. Y. L. J., March 23, 1962, p. 18, col. 3, and cases therein cited.)

Wheeler v. Breslin

47 Misc. 507 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1905

Cortelyou v. Lansing, 2 Caines Cas. 200 ; Roberts v. Sykes, 30 Barb. 176 ; Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N. Y. 235 ; Brown v. Bronson, 93 App. Div. 312 . … It is unnecessary to review the authorities, as that has been done in Brown v. Bronson. It may be said, however, that the foundation case on which criticism of Roberts v. Sykes has rested (Cȯrtelyou v.

People v. Concepcion

172 Misc. 2d 134 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1997

(People v Schlaich, 218 AD2d 398, 400 [1st Dept 1996] [citations omitted].) … (See, People v Martinez, 80 NY2d 444, 448 [1992].) Thus, the police properly pursued and stopped the Pontiac and removed the defendants. (See, People v Robinson, 74 NY2d 773, 774 [1989].)

In re Zoning Variance of Gillen

21 Ohio Misc. 84 · Scioto County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 10, 1969

Selected Properties, Inc., v. … As was stated in Selected Properties v.

Schmidtmann v. Tofany

50 Misc. 2d 698 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1966

While this court recognizes the broad language in the Cash case and Palmer v. Board of Educ. ( 276 N. Y. 222 ) it is constrained to agree with the interpretation given to Cash v. … The court, with Cash cited to it as a precedent, expressly rejected such a possibility in Austin v. Board of Higher Educ. (5 N Y 2d 430, 442).

Burhans v. Carter

20 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

(Erwin v. Saunders, 1 Cow., 249 ; Ely v. Kilborn, 5 Den., 514 ; Payne v. Ladue, 1 Hill, 116 ; Brown v. Hull, 1 Den., 400 .) … (Dowe v. Schutt, 2 Den., 621 ; Rice v. Mather, 3 Wend., 62 ; Cameron v. Chappell et al., 24 Wend., 94 ; Prest. of Troy City Bk. v. McSpedon, 3 Abb. Appeal Decisions, 133; Bassett v. Bassett et al., 55 Barb., 505 .)

Cicalo v. New York City Housing & Development Administration

79 Misc. 2d 769 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1974

Mandamus *774 lies only where the act is purely ministerial (Matter of Walsh v. LaGuardia, 269 N. Y. 437 ). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Kooleraire Serv. and Installation Corp. v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … Nor does the Board of Estimate’s refusal to issue a Planned Unit Development permit fall within the strictures of Matter of North Shore Steak House v. Board of Apps. of Inc.

Hazman v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.

2 Daly 130 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1867

For these reasons, I think there was sufficient in the case to go to the jury (Bernhardt v. Renssalaer and Saratoga Railroad Co. 32 Barb. 168, 169 ; Smith v. New York and Harlem Railroad Co. 19 N. … Y. 127, 133 ; Edgerton v. The Same, 35 Barb. 193, 198 ; Brown v. New York Central Railroad Co. 31 Barb. 385 ; Caldwell v. Murphy, 1 Duer, 241 ; Alden v. New York Central Railroad Co. 26 N. Y. 102 ; Buel v.