Case law

Williamson v. Randolph

48 Misc. 96 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1905

In Commonwealth v. … Deverell v. Musical Mut. Protec. Union, 118 N. Y. 107 ) and he did so.. By his acquiescence he induced the board of officers to proceed with the investigation.”

Min Wu v. Institute of Elec. & Elecs. Engrs., Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 31001(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Mar 24, 2025

Min Wu v Institute of Elec. & Elecs. … Sealing may be appropriate to preserve the confidentiality of materials which involve the internal finances of a party and are of more minimal public interest (see D 'Amocir v Ohrenstein & Brown, LLP

Razukas v. New York State Department of Correction

186 Misc. 429 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1945

Page v. Brophy, 248 App. Div. 309 , appeal dismissed 277 N. Y. 673 .) … So long as the Parole Board violates no positive statutory duty its discretion is absolute and beyond review in the courts. (Matter of Hines v. State Board of Parole, 293 N. Y. 254 .)

Dease v. Reese

39 Misc. 657 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1903

Browning v. Bettis, 8 Paige, 568 . … As was said in Browning v.

First New York Bank for Business v. 155 E. 34 Realty Co.

158 Misc. 2d 658 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1993

This argument was accepted in the case of Board of Mgrs. v Chelsea Realty Assocs. (NYLJ, Aug. 5, 1992, at 22, col 5 [Sup Ct, NY County]). … N. v Grassi, 51 AD2d 502 [4th Dept 1976]; Meltzer v Grazi, 10 AD2d 869 [2d Dept 1960]). *662 Clearly, under the Bankers Trust decision (supra), if FNY had not applied for the appointment of a receiver, any lien of the Board

Park Inn Hotel, Inc. v. Messing

31 Misc. 2d 961 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1962

Y. 73, 81 ; Rothschild v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 204 N. … Div. 196 ; Potter v. Rossiter, 109 App. Div. 737 ; Matter of Roeben, 53 N. Y. S. 2d 432, 434; Colla-Negri v.

In re Browning

125 Misc. 2d 896 · New York City Family Court · Feb 28, 1984

(McD ermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 NY2d 20 ; Brandes v Pettibone, 62 AD2d 1133 .) However, here the Commissioner’s employees were no more than witnesses. … Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v Thorpe, 296 NY 223 ; Matter of City of New York [Headley], 21 NY2d 786 ; Plummer v Macy & Co., 69 AD2d 765 .)

Marston v. French

17 N.Y.S. 509 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 1, 1892

The rule is conclusively settled otherwise by the court of appeals, (Barney v. Forbes, 118 N. Y. 580, 585 , 23 N. E. Rep. 890; Drake v. Seaman, 97 N. … These propositions are elementary. *510 Defendant’s guaranty to Brown recites that, “whereas, I, Alexander Brown and Chester Phillips Smith have made and entered into various contracts;” and this is the only expression of

Henry v. Rowell

31 Misc. 384 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1900

Patterson ( 13 Johns. 398 ), Martin v. Wright ( 13 Wend. 460 ), Reynolds v. Robinson ( 64 N. Y. 589 ) and Collier v. Rutledge ( 136 N. Y. 621 ). … The case of Quackenbush v.

Labbe v. Russi

158 Misc. 2d 532 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1993

Haderxhanji v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 AB2d 368, supra; Solari v Vincent, 77 Misc 2d 54 , supra.) … (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471 [1972].)

People v. Santos

82 Misc. 2d 184 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1975

Parolees until the expiration of their sentences remain under the supervision of the Parole Board, subject to remand to prison if they violate their parole conditions (Correction Law, §§ 215, 216; Matter of Cummings v Regan … There was, however, no direct or *194 positive showing of hostility (Richardson, Evidence [10th ed], §§ 483, 503, 513; Potter v Browne, 197 NY 288 ; Schultz v Third Ave. R. R. Co., 89 NY 242, 250 ).

Dahman v. Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co.

84 Ohio Law. Abs. 93 · Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 5, 1960

Board of Review, 150 Oh St 535, 537 (1948), denying benefits but expressing the purpose of the act; and United States Coal Company v. Board of Review, 16 O. O. 323, (affirmed 66 Oh Ap 329). … Reid v. Board of Review, 155 Oh St 6 (1951). Sec. 4141.46 R. C., provides that the Unemployment Compensation Act “... . shall be liberally construed.”

In re Notice of Intention to Appeal

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 810 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1900

In Moore v. Brown, 10 Ohio, 197, it was held that the omission to enter notice at the term at which the judgment was entered could not be cured by a nunc pro tunc order' of a subsequent term. … Stat., now requires the' notice to be entered within three days, and so far as this question is concerned, that is the only difference, so that Moore v. Brown, supra, controls. The judge’s docket is not a record.

People ex rel. Bingham Operating Corp. v. Eyrich

186 Misc. 434 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1945

The relator offered in evidence a certificate of the Board of Supervisors showing that the board had fixed the equalization rate for the City of Utica at 65% of the true value. … In Scott v. Empire State Degree of Honor ( 204 App.

Lawfred Realty Service Corp. v. Waters

15 Misc. 2d 113 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1958

Whether the Town Board might properly consider how many gasoline stations the needs of the traveling public required in this neighborhood is at least debatable (Matter of Turner v. … Finally, the court repeats what was said in Matter of Rhodes v.

In re Appeal of R&R Lounge, Inc.

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 452 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Mar 13, 1985

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Pace, 218 Pa. Super. 300 , 280 A.2d 642 (1971); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Washington Sporting Club, 13 Pa. Commw. 257 , 320 A.2d 851 (1974). … See In re Carver House, supra; Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Pace, supra; 4-6 Club v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 442 Pa. 154 , 275 A.2d 40 (1971); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Yugovich, 217 Pa.

People ex rel. Decker v. Waters

4 Misc. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1893

People v. Vandeventer, 38 Hun, 43 ; People v. Board of Fire Comrs., 73 N. Y. 437 ; People v. Comrs. of Brooklyn, 106 id. 64. Ho errors of law are presented as was the case in Martin, v. … Mackin v. Board of Police, 107 id. 235 ; People ex rel. Nicholl v. Asylum, 122 id. 191. It will not be issued in cases of doubtful right. Wood Uandamus, 1; People ex rel. Nicholl v. Asylum, 122 R. Y. 191; People ex rel.

Bayer v. Pugsley

13 Misc. 2d 610 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1958

Y. 119, 128 , supra; People v. Underhill, 144 N. Y. 316; Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge Co. v. Bachman, 66 N. Y. 261 .) … (People v. Underhill, 144 N. Y. 316, supra.)

Bekermus v. Nardy

123 Misc. 2d 378 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1984

Corp. v Board of Appeals, 309 NY 730 ; Town of Greenburgh v Buser, supra; Reichenbach v Windward at Southampton, supra.) … with the building and zoning ordinances of the town (Beneke v Board of Appeals, 51 Misc 2d 20 ).

Trustees of German Township v. Farmers & Citizens Sav. Bank Co.

66 Ohio Law. Abs. 332 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · May 14, 1953

Hibbs v. Board of County Commissioners, 35 Oh St 458, decided in 1880. However, on April 20, 1896, the Supreme Court of Ohio, in Hixson v. Burson, 54 Oh St 470, 43 N. … Langdon v. Trustees of Columbia Township, XIV W. L. B. 325; Hopple v. Trustees of Brown Tp., 13 Oh St 311; Trustees of Harrison Tp. v. Harrison Tp., 5 Ohio N. P., N.