Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Fabiano v. Philip Morris Inc.

    29 Misc. 3d 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 2010

    Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. … 12 NY3d 769 [2009], cert denied 558 US —, 130 S Ct 197 [2009], affg Rose v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 53 AD3d 80 [1st Dept 2008]).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Hooker

    118 Misc. 2d 760 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1983

    , People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388 ; People v McCurdy, 86 AD2d 493 ; People v Cadby, 75 AD2d 713 ; People v Jacobson, 109 Misc 2d 204 ). … , supra; People v Brown, supra; People v McCurdy, supra; People v Cadby, supra; People v De Lucia, 20 NY2d 275 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. City of Niagara Falls

    65 Misc. 92 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1909

    People v. Flagg, 17 N. Y. 584 ; Peterson v. Mayor, supra. … People v. Flagg, supra; Gleason v. Dalton, 28 App. Div. 555 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Abrams v. LaGuardia

    174 Misc. 421 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1940

    See Haggerty v. City of New York, 267 N. … (Matter of Rosenthal v. McGoldrick, 279 N. Y. 688 ; Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrick , Id. 246; Matter of Hetherington v. McGoldrick , Id. 687; Matter of McCarthy v. LaGuardia, 172 Misc. 260 ; affd., 259 App. Div. 710 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Castle Estates, Inc. v. Hubbard

    52 Misc. 2d 774 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1967

    The mere fact that the developer tried, as did the board, to adjust the problem in good faith, does not constitute a waiver of petitioner’s rights. (Matter of Hilbol Realty v. Barnhart, 205 Misc. 187 .) … The inaction of the Planning Board cannot circumvent these requirements. (Levin v. Thornbury, supra; Levin v. Cocks, 141 N. Y. S. 2d 595.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fullam v. Kronman

    51 Misc. 2d 1079 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1966

    The petitioner prays for a judgment “that the undated decision of the Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Lattingtown be declared null and void and set aside and that petitioner’s plat be approved pursuant to the … Kronman, Chairman of the Planning Board, *1080 the decision was made in executive session after the hearing on May 20, 1966, but that affiant also admits that the decision was not reduced to writing nor finally approved or

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Sanchez

    112 Misc. 2d 100 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1982

    In People v Brown ( 68 AD2d 503 ) the court held that psychiatric testimony concerning pressure on an individual to commit an act was not admitted as competent testimony where the defendant entered the defense of justification … The court in the Brown case resolved the issue on the basis that the threat of imminent danger was not present.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Swartwout v. Village of Port Jervis

    23 Misc. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1898

    Chamberlain v. Forrest, 96 N. Y. 544 . … Co. v. Haupt, 104 N. Y. 377 , and Matter of Corwin, 135 id. 245.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Calvert

    7 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 103 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 28, 1908

    In the case of Downey v. The Indiana State Board of Agriculture, 129 Ind., 443 , the Supreme Court of Indiana decided that the Indiana State Board of Agriculture was a private corporation. … The case of Thompson v. Lambert, 44 Iowa, 239 , is also authority upon the point that this State Board of Agriculture is not a public agency of the state.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bank of New York Co. v. Irving Bank Corp.

    139 Misc. 2d 665 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1988

    (Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496 .) … The illegal discrimination between boards is not thereby cured. Defendant cites Staklinsky v Pyramid Elec.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Roosevelt Field, Inc. v. Podeyn

    47 Misc. 2d 677 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1964

    V. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Dominick

    35 Pa. D. & C.5th 313 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Jan 17, 2014

    to attorney Brown. … Com. v. Wholaver, 605 Pa. 325, 346 , 989 A.2d 883, 895 (2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 332 (U.S. 2010); Com. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Schlecter v. Jennings

    130 Misc. 748 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1927

    Kane v. Hanley, 116 Misc. 624 ; People v. Madden. 120 App. Div. 338 ), and the exercise of the discretionary *752 power vested in the Parole Board to revoke a prisoner’s parole cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. … Ackron v. Hunt, 122 Misc. 247 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Treiber v. Lanigan

    48 Misc. 2d 434 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1965

    (Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 568 [1964].) … (Reynolds v. Sims, supra, p. 585 .) The Board of .Supervisors should act, therefore, no later than March 1, 1966, which allows an opportunity for judicial review, if any is deemed necessary.

    Modified by Treiber v. Lanigan, 25 A.D.2d 202 (1966)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Cropper

    170 Misc. 2d 631 · New York County Courts · Nov 22, 1996

    US 386 [1798]; Doe v Pataki, supra, at 605; People v Afrika, 168 Misc 2d 618 [Sup Ct, Monroe County 1996]). … Pataki, supra, at 630; People v Afrika, supra).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Keto v. Schaefer

    29 Pa. D. & C.3d 637 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County · Nov 25, 1983

    Howarth v. Miller, 382 Pa. 419 , 115 A.2d 222 (1955); Baker v. Roslyn Swim Club, supra. We agree with the Schaefers and Daleys that these rules should normally be applied. … Merlino v. Eannotti, 177 Pa. Super. 307, 316 , 110 A.2d 783, 787 (1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inman v. Foster

    8 Wend. 602 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1832

    The same evidence has been rejected in Connecticut, in Treat v. Browning, 4 Conn. R. 415. … Browning; and this has given rise to another objection.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Browning v. Bryant

    178 Misc. 576 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1942

    Cayuga Indians v. Board of *577 Comrs. of Land Office, 99 N. Y. 648 ; Matter of Nash v. Brooks, 276 id. 75.) … Here the petitioners were not entitled to a notice of hearing and no interest of theirs could be the subject of adjudication by the board. (People ex rel. Steward v. Railroad Comrs., 160 N. Y. 202 .)

    Disagreed with by Abel v. PLANNING & ZON. COM'N OF NEW CANAAN, 297 Conn. 414 (2010)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Sharp

    1 Bosw. 539 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 11, 1857

    In Marshall v. Vultee, 1 E. D. … In the Eeport of the Committee of the Board, on the subject of this extension, it is added, “ one-third of the expense will of course be borne by the Corporation.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Park v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad

    32 N.Y.S. 482 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1895

    There is abundant evidence to sustain the finding that Brown was incompetent, within the rule laid down in Coppins v. Railroad Co., 122 N. Y. 557, 564 , 25 N. E. 915 . … Gilman v. Railroad Co., 13 Allen, 433 ; Monahan v. City of Worcester, 150 Mass. 439 , 23 N. E. 228 ; Railway Co. v. Stupak, 123 Ind. 210, 225 , 23 N. E. 246 ; Davis v. Railroad Co., 20 Mich. 124 ; Railroad Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.