Case law

People v. Sweeter

126 Misc. 2d 616 · New York County Courts · Dec 31, 1984

Poster v Jackson ( 278 App Div 734 , affd 303 NY 680 ); People v Brown ( 66 AD2d 223 ); and People v Pries ( 81 AD2d 1039 ). … Eldard v La Vallee, 15 AD2d 611 , mot for lv to opp den 11 NY2d 642 , cert den 371 US 837 [two assaults committed in the course of an escape attempt])” (People v Brown, 66 AD2d 223, 226 , supra).

Cunningham v. East River Electric Light Co.

17 N.Y.S. 372 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Jan 11, 1892

See Nebenzahl v. Townsend, 61 How. Pr. 353 ; Landt v. Hilts, 19 Barb. 283 ; Sleight v. Ogle, 4 E. D. Smith, 445; Marks v. Townsend, 97 N. Y. 596 ; Reynolds v. Corp, 3 Caines, 267 ; Brown v. Crowl, 5 Wend. 298 . … See Sleight v. Ogle, 4 E. D. Smith, 445; also Von Latham v. Libby, 38 Barb. 339 ; Brown v. Chadsey, 39 Barb. 253 ; Ackroyd v. Ackroyd, 3 Daly, 38 ; Castro v. Uriarte, 2 Civil Proc. R. 214 .

In re Wadsworth

88 Ohio Law. Abs. 170 · Ohio Public Utilities Commission · Jun 9, 1960

Brown, Registered Pharmacist, Wadsworth, Ohio; Mr. James C. Morris, Senior Vice President of Ohio Box Board, Wadsworth, Ohio; Mr. Jack Sommers, Automobile Dealer, Wadsworth, Ohio; Mrs. Raymond C. … V. Hanson Sheet Metal, Wadsworth, Ohio; Mr. Joseph George, Production & Purchasing Manager, Wadsworth Foundry Company, Wadsworth, Ohio; Mr.

Jackson ex dem. Russell v. Rowland

6 Wend. 666 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1831

The cases of Jackson v. Jones, 9 Cowen, 182, and Jackson v. Tuttle, 9 id. 233 6 Wendell, 213 , S. … The case of Jackson v. Harder. 2 Johns. R. 202, which is the authority for the position, does not support it unqualifiedly.

Smith v. Hartman

208 Misc. 880 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1955

Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298 ; Town of Somers v. Camarco, 308 N. Y. 537 ; People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105 .) … Y. 97 ; Matter of Buckley v. Fasbender, 275 App. Div. 853 , and Matter of Frontuto v. Board of Trustees of Vil. of East Rochester, 276 App.

Kobylski v. Agone

37 Misc. 2d 255 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1962

Callahan v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 174 N. … (See, also, Bogert v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 106 App.

Comparato v. Knauf

61 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1969

(Vernon Park Realty v. City of Mt. Vernon, 307 N. Y. 493 ; Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221 .) … (Matter of Nowak v. Wereszynski, 21 A D 2d 427; Matter of Mandis v. Gorski, 24 A. D 2d 181, 184, 185.)

Kinne v. Kinne

2 Thomp. & Cook 391 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

According to the testimony of the witness, Brown, and as he recollects the transaction, they were not. … Quimby in the case of Tarrant v. Ware, supra, which, indeed, it much resembles. The language of the court of appeals in Willis v.

Fowler v. Clearwater

35 Barb. 143 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1861

(Cardell v. McNiel, 21 N. Y. Rep. 336 . Brown v. Curtiss, 2 id. 225.) … The cases of Brown v. Curtiss, (2 Comst. 225,) and Cardell v. McNiel, ( 21 N. Y.

In re Heyman

137 Misc. 278 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1930

Under the circumstances the board was without jurisdiction to reopen the case and entertain what was, in effect, an application that it set aside and rescind its former decision. (See Matter of Biker v. … Ridgeway v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 349 v. Metropolitan Dade County

6 Fla. Supp. 2d 71 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jan 4, 1984

The powers of the Board are set forth in Section 203.5 of the South Florida Building Code. The Board is authorized to make interpretations of the Code’s provisions where the Code is unclear and ambiguous. … The Board is therefore not authorized to make an interpretation of this provision.

Rabenbauer v. New York State Department of Corrections

46 Misc. 3d 603 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2014

(Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69 [1980]; Matter of Epps v Travis, 241 AD2d 738 [3d Dept 1997]; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470 [2000].) … (Matter of Santos v Evans, 81 AD3d 1059 [3d Dept 2011]; Matter of Wise v New York State Div. of Parole, 54 AD3d 463 [3d Dept 2008].)

People ex rel. Van Burkett v. Montanye

70 Misc. 2d 907 · New York County Courts · Jul 6, 1972

On June 29, 1972, the United States Supreme Court in Morrissey v. Brewer ( 408 U. … Maggio v. Casscles (28 N Y 2d 415). There the court held that, in the matter of providing counsel at a parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Menechino v.

Hanson v. Ontario Milk Producers Cooperative, Inc.

58 Misc. 2d 138 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1968

of directors A court will not and cannot interfere with the ordinary business judgment of a board of directors of a corporation (Manson v. … Y. 313 ; Nechis v. Gramatan Gardens, 35 Misc 2d 949, 951 ; Marony v. Applegate, 29 N. Y. S. 2d 421).

Dunning v. Roberts

35 Barb. 463 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1862

This decision was put, as regards this point, on the authority of the Union Bank v. Coster, (3 Comst. 203. See also Grant v. Hotchkiss, 26 Barb. 63; Church v. Brown, 21 N. Y. Rep. 315 .) … Coster, and in *470 Gates v. McKee were approved and followed in Church v. Brown .

Utter v. McLean

6 N.Y.S. 281 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1889

Brown, upon the ground that said confession of judgment was fraudulently entered. … And in Dunham v.

Cantwell v. Lane

34 Misc. 2d 933 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Clare’s Hosp. v. Breslin, 14 A D 2d 380, 382) which is “ superior and paramount ” (id.) in relation to the Board of Supervisors and therefore the latter is subordinate to the respondents. … (Buttfield v.

Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Wilson

4 Va. Cir. 81 · Warren County Circuit Court · Apr 6, 1983

(Browning) and Wilson dated October 20, 1977. … They heavily rely on Richardson v. Paxton Co., 203 Va. 790 (1962). There the Court held that the restraint was too broad and that "it encompasses activities in which Paxton is not engaged."

Thackray v. Crager

43 Pa. D. & C. 301 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 1, 1941

“Such restriction is violated by the use of a building-on the premises as a public boarding house. . . .” *307 See also Pocono Manor Assn. et al. v. Allen et al., 337 Pa. 442 (1940), and Fox et al. v. … It comes closer to being a hotel or public boarding house, both held by the Taylor ease to be in violation of such a restriction.” See also Douglass v. Queeney, Jr., et ux., 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 336 (1933).

People ex rel. New York Central v. Keno

61 Misc. 345 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

Tax Law, § 2; People v. Gray, 185 N. Y. 196 . … Sims v. Fire Commissioners, 73 N. Y. 437 ), but not legal conclusions (Masterson v. Townshend, 123 N.