Case law

Stage v. Whitehouse

43 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1964

The courts of this State have held that on contract bids, such security may be required and treated as liquidated damages (Davin v. City of Syracuse, 69 Misc. 285 , affd. 145 App. Div. 904 ; Brendese v. … Co. v. County of Suffolk, 233 N. Y. S. 2d 627; Matter of Herrick Elec. Co. v. County of Suffolk, 6 Misc 2d 886 ).

Broadway Litho & Printing Corp. v. State

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 430 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 17, 1969

Mohr v. Giambra

7 Misc. 3d 723 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 2005

Bank v Board of Assessors of City of Rochester, 248 AD2d 949, 950 *725 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 811 [1998]; see also Matter of Klipp v New York State Civ. Serv. … Employees’ Assn., 181 AD2d 1052, 1052 [1992]; accord Matter of Board of Elections of County of Westchester v O’Rourke, 210 AD2d 402 [1994]; Election Law § 3-300).

Rhodes v. Waters

15 Misc. 2d 119 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1958

Herman, 1 A D 2d 980; Matter of Lerner v. Young, 286 App. Div. 1109 ; Matter of Greenpoint Sav. Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 281 N. Y. 534 ; Matter of St. Anthony’s Church v. … Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals ( 281 N. Y. 534 , supra), namely, will the establishment proposed imperil the safety of person or property! We take it that in applying this test the rule of reason applies.

Schumacher v. Waring

27 N.Y.S. 325 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 5, 1894

Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283 ; Macniffe v. Ludington, 13 Abb. N. C. 407 ; Fixam v. Brown, 14 Daly, 110 . … Brown v. Sullivan, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 20 N. Y. Supp. 634 ; Siefke v. Siefke, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 25 N. Y. Supp. 762 .

M. E. Church & Society v. Ashtabula Water Co.

20 Ohio C.C. 578 · Ashtabula Circuit Court · Mar 15, 1900

In Proctor v. Snodgrass, 5 C. C. … Also Miller v. Brown, 33 Ohio St., 547 .

Fina Homes, Inc. v. Beckel

24 Misc. 2d 823 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1960

(Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 8 A D 2d 970; Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm, 4 A D 2d 766.) Any facts found on the basis of the board members’ knowledge of the property should also be stated. … (See Matter of Chasanoff v.

Hicks v. Northeastern Illinois University

42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Feb 6, 1990

The student newspaper, the Northeastern University Print, a/k/a the Uni Print is not an agent of the Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities or Northeastern Illinois University. … Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction over the university or Uni Print and the Board of Governors is an improper party to this suit since no agency relationship exists.

Munter v. Gross

42 Misc. 2d 690 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1964

Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 33 Misc 2d 754 and Matter of Franck v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 33 Misc 2d 1075, 1076 , revd. on other grounds involving the merits in 19 A D 2d 741; Matter of Derenna v. … Justice Frankfurter in Anti-Fascist Comm. v. McGrath ( 341 U.

Villani v. Berle

91 Misc. 2d 603 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1977

McHugh, supra; Matter of Mandle v Brown, 5 NY2d 51, 65 ). … Board of Educ., supra, p 231; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329 ; Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v State Liq.

Hanley v. Brennan

19 Abb. N. Cas. 186 · City of New York Municipal Court · Apr 15, 1887

Legal liabilities may be enforced against lunatics, whether the mental incapacity has been judicially declared or not (Sanford v. Sanford, 62 N. Y. 553 ; Brown v. Nichols, 9 Abb. Pr. N. S. 1, 15 ; Prentiss v. … Browne, J., concurred. The case of a defendant who has been judicially declared to be incompetent in consequence of lunacy, or idiocy, is expressly provided for by Code Civ.

H. P. V. T. Corp. v. McGuire

58 Misc. 2d 159 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1968

Board, one Mr. … Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298 ).

Bergerman v. Lindsay

58 Misc. 2d 1013 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1969

Board of Supervisors of Erie County, 27 A D 2d 902; Glessing v. State of New York, 27 A D 2d 977; see, also, Saratogian, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of County of Saratoga, 20 N Y 2d 244; Augostini v. … Board of Educ., 387 U. S. 105 ; Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.

In re Brearton

44 Misc. 247 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1904

McFarland v. Crary, 6 Wend. 298 ; Sargeant v. Webster, 54 Mass. 497 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 127 U. S. 579 ; United States v. Ballin, 144 id. 1. … H. 383; approved, United States v. Ballin, 144 U. S. 9 .

Onondaga Water Service Corp. v. Crown Mills, Inc.

132 Misc. 848 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1928

Whitestown Water Works Co., 113 id. 547, 554; Matter of Armitage v. Board of Education, 122 Misc. 586, 589 ; affd., 210 App. Div. 812 ; affd., 240 N. Y. 548 .) … (Kitching v. Brown, 180 N. Y. 414 ; Hoisting Engine Sales Co. v. Hart, 237 id. 30.) Judgment of condemnation and order appointing commissioners of appraisal granted.

Cohen v. CASSM Realty Corp.

54 Misc. 3d 256 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2016

(Fletcher v Dakota, Inc., 99 AD3d at 49-50 ; Weinreb v 37 Apts. Corp., 97 AD3d at 57; Kleinerman v 245 E. 87 Tenants Corp., 74 AD3d at 449; see Perlbinder v Board of Mgrs. of 411 E. 53rd St. … Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N.

Cantrell v. Conner

6 Daly 39 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 5, 1875

Brown from whom she hired, occupied the back apartments of No. 306 East 114th street. … Brown, who lived in the house. The only inference from this proof is that Mrs. Brown was the landlord or landlady, as the hiring was from her.

Tyler v. Stevens

11 Barb. 485 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1851

(Brown v. Curtis, 2 Comst. 225. Durham, v. Manrow, Id. 533.) But the principle of the case of Johnson v. Gilbert , above referred *488 to, was distinctly sustained in the decision in each of those cases. … In the case of Durham v. Manrow, before referred to, Judge Jewett, in speaking of the case of Brown v.

In re Caliguiri

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Sep 2, 1977

It found that the rulings in Peoples Party and Consumer Party had been undermined by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L. … Salera v. Tucker,...

M. E. Ch. & Society v. Ashtabula Water Co.

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 648 · Ashtabula Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1900

On page 287 of the opinion in Cincinnati v. … Also Miller v. Brown, 38 Ohio St., 547 .