Case law

Commonwealth v. Sheeler

73 Pa. D. & C. 570 · Philadelphia County Court of Oyer and Terminer · Oct 2, 1950

Although it appears that “the Board of Pardons is the proper tribunal for him to appeal to” (Com. v. … Taylor v. Alabama, supra, 265 .

New York State Unified Court System v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

2024 NY Slip Op 31928(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 4, 2024

New York State Unified Court System v New York State Public Employment Relations Board 2024 NY Slip Op 31928(U) June 4, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket … NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/04/2024 Rockland v New York State Pub. Empl.

People ex rel. Grissler v. Stuyvesant

3 Thomp. & Cook 179 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874

People v. Stuyves *183 ant, opinion by Learned, J.; see also Stuyvesant v. Grissler, 12 Abb. N. S. 6. Nor can it be maintained that Joseph R. … It appears by Roach v.

Quinn v. Mayor of New York

63 Barb. 595 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1872

(Newell v. The People, 7 N. Y. 97 .) … Tribune Association v. The Mayor, 48 Barb. 240 .)

Ullmann v. Christenfeld

56 Misc. 2d 1041 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1968

Respondents have no objection to permitting petitioners, or their representatives to examine all the enrollment books at the *1042 premises of the Board of Elections, to letting them make copies thereof, or to selling them … (Myer v. Myer, 271 App. Div. 465 .) Petitioners dispute the alleged cost price of $1.25 and they are entitled to a hearing on that (Matter of Holwell v. Meisser, 28 A D 2d 1003).

Sklarsky v. Wayne Lawrence Construction Corp.

28 Misc. 2d 391 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1961

Woodward-Brown Realty Corp., 209 App. Div. 548, 554 , affd. 239 N. Y. 613 ; Price v. Woodward-Brown Realty Corp., 190 N. Y. S. 561, affd. 201 App. Div. 837 ). … Mohawk Overall Co. v. Brown, 163 App. Div. 157, 159 ).

Fauci v. Lee

38 Misc. 2d 564 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1963

(Matter of Sylvester v. Mescall, 277 App. Div. 961 ; Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing Auth., 270 App. Div. 1022 , affd. 297 N. Y. 911 .) The circumstances required are well stated in Matter of Smith v. Dillon ( 267 App. … Y. 305 ; Foot v. Stiles, 57 id. 401 ; Weeks v. Ellis, 2 Barb. 320 .)

In re Mandel

184 Misc. 2d 897 · New York County Courts · Jun 29, 2000

(People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586 [1984]; People v Love, 111 AD2d 134 [1st Dept 1985].) … (People v Gonzalez, supra, at 589 .)

Levy v. Mount Airy Building & Loan Ass'n

17 Pa. D. & C. 381 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 29, 1932

L. 73, Sec. 37, Cl. 2, was passed, providing that not more than one-half the available cash in the treasury of the association should be used to pay withdrawals except by direction of the board of directors (see Brown v. … We think this is covered in Stone v. Schiller B. & L. Ass’n et al., 302 Pa. 544 .

Ernst v. McDowell

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 145 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Feb 5, 1911

In Brown v. … in the case of State v.

State v. Sarrocco

96 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 28, 1997

At that point the briefcase was in the same position relative to the defendant as the closed container was in State v. Brown (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 349 , 588 N.E.2d 113 . … Florida v. Wells (1990), 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S.Ct. 1632, 1635 , 109 L.Ed.2d 1, 6-7 .

New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd. v. New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining

2025 NY Slip Op 25014 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jan 21, 2025

See, e.g. , Gress v. Brown , 20 NY3d 957 (2012); N.Y.C. Health & Hosps. Corp. v. McBarnette , 84 NY2d 194 (1994); Solnick , 49 NY2d 224 ; Rosenthal v. City of NY , 283 AD2d 156 (1st Dep't 2001); 1630 N. … Rojas v.

Coughlan v. Cowan

21 Misc. 2d 667 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1959

(Matter of Ellis v. Dixon, 281 App. Div. 987 , affg. on another ground 118 N. Y. S. 2d 815; Matter of King v. Ambellan, 12 Misc 2d 333 ; Matter of Leeds v. Board of Educ., 19 Misc 2d 860 .) … (Matter of Ellis v. Dixon, supra.) With equal force this applies to the board members who are possessed of this knowledge.

Healey v. Dudley

5 Lans. 115 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

In Conner v. … In Ross v. Curtiss ( 31 N.

Knewstub Appeal

51 Pa. D. & C.2d 335 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jan 5, 1971

A restriction not expressly included by the legislature may not be inserted under the guise of construction: Altieri v. Allentown Retirement Board, 368 Pa. 176 . … Terms not defined in a zoning ordinance are presumably used in the broadest possible sense: United Cerebral Palsy Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 382 Pa. 67 .

Beil v. Russo

120 Misc. 2d 406 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1983

The board of education or trustees of a school district are hereby authorized to lease real property upon such terms and conditions as the board of education or trustees may deem appropriate to any person, partnership or … (Accord see Village of Camillus v West Side Gymnastics School, 109 Misc 2d 609 .) The reason for the more specific reference to school buildings is easily explained.

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Herrington

33 Misc. 2d 455 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1962

Corp. v. Brown, supra). … Corp. v. Brown, supra).

Georgia v. Smith

101 Misc. 2d 630 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1979

The petitioners, who are voters qualified to vote in an election for members of the City of Binghamton School Board, seek to compel respondent to file a statement of expenditures in compliance with section 1530 of the Education … Respondent admits that he was chairman of a committee to raise money in support of two candidates for election to the school board, admits that he did not file any statement, but insists that section 1530 does not authorize

Gillane v. Woodman

5 N.Y. St. Rep. 318 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1887

The decision in the cases of The Mayor, etc., v. Eden Musee, etc., Co.. The Mayor, etc., v. Gould and The People ex rel. Hamlin v. … The Board of Excise Commissioners do not support the construction of the statute contended for by the respondent’s counsel, inasmuch as they relate to the construction to be giveh to the Public Amusement Act., For these reasons

People ex rel. Rossney v. Armbruster

36 N.Y. St. Rep. 918 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1891

The executive board is a department of the city government of the city of Eochester, as expressed in § 142 of chap. 14 of the Laws of 1880, which constitute the city charter. … performed by the executive board.