Case law

Read v. Knell

23 N.Y.S. 941 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1893

Perry, Trusts, 205; Hawley v. Cramer, 4 Cow. 719 ; Forbes v. Halsey, 26 N. Y. 53, 65 ; Harrington v. Brown, 5 Pick. 519 , 521. And all the authorities are to the same effect. … Harrington v. Brown, supra. He might, perhaps, have established his defense of the defect of parties, but that question, as we have seen, was not considered nor passed upon by the court at special term.

Roseboom v. Billington

17 Johns. 182 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1819

In the case of Rose v. … Brown, who gives the same date to the bond, says, expressly, that the obligor died in April, 1730.

Board of Mgrs. of the Dorchester Towers Condominium v. Hwang

2024 NY Slip Op 30030 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jan 4, 2024

Board of Mgrs. of the Dorchester Towers Condominium v Hwang 2024 NY Slip Op 30030(U) January 4, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No … OF THE DORCESTER TOWERS CONDOMINIUM v HWANG et al.

Hurd v. West

7 Cow. 752 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1827

J., in Seymour v. Brown, 19 John. 47 .) … The opinion of the court in Slaughter v. Green and others, (1 Randolph, 3,) looks somewhat like supporting Seymour v. Brown , but the case was dissimilar.

Kersellius v. Bratton

50 Misc. 3d 935 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2015

“It [is] the sole province of the Medical Board and the Board of Trustees, not the court, to resolve conflicts in the medical evidence” (Matter of Goodacre v Kelly, 96 AD3d 625 , 626 [1st Dept 2012]). … A tie vote by the Board of Trustees results in a denial of ADR (see Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 90 NY2d 139, 144-145 [1997]; see e.g.

Grace v. Forbes

64 Misc. 130 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1909

Boon v. City of Utica, 4 Misc. Rep. 584 ; People v. Board of Improvement, 48 N. Y. 227 ; Bazet v. City of Pittsburg, 127 Penn. St. 548; State v. Barlow, 48 Mo. 17 ; People v. Commissioners, 4 Reb. 150; Coggeshall v. … Trundy v.

City of Buffalo v. State Bd. of EqualizaTion

46 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1965

Regulating Dist. v. Adirondack League Club (supra, p. 489) the court stated: “ As we have pointed out, the district board has no special character different from that of the State. … (O’Brien v. Town of Greenburgh, 239 App. Div. 555 , affd. 266 N. Y. 582 ; County of Herkimer v. Village of Herkimer, 251 App. Div. 126 , affd. 279 N. Y. 560 .)

Conrad v. Hinman

122 Misc. 2d 531 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1984

(Webster Assoc. v Town of Webster, 59 NY2d 220, 227 , citing Matter of Tuxedo Conservation & Taxpayers Assn. v Town Bd., supra; see, also, e.g., Matter of Concerned Citizens Against Crossgates v Town of Guilderland Zoning … (Smith v Skagit County, 75 Wn 2d 715, 739.) For all the above reasons, the court grants the petitioners’ application and hereby annuls the October 3, 1983, action of the town board.

Macomber v. Maine State Employees Association

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 1, 2019

Such a dismissal is subject to review by the Labor Relations Board. Id. 2  Lundrigan v. Me. … Labor Relations Bd., 482 A.2d 834, 836 (Me. 1984) (citations and quotations omitted); see also Brown v. Me. State Emples. Ass'n, 1997 ME 24,, 7,690 A.2d 956.

Barnett v. Fields

196 Misc. 339 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1949

Under the circumstances, the conclusion of the board of examiners of the board of education must be upheld. (Matter of Marburg v. Cole, 286 N. Y. 202, 208 [1941] ; Matter of Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N. … The cases of Matter of Fink v. Finegan (supra) and Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners of Bd. of Education of City of N. Y. (supra) are readily distinguishable. In Matter of Fink v.

Fleischmann v. Graves

118 Misc. 214 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1922

Kiehm v. Board of Education, 198 App. Div. 476 ; Freeman v. Brooks, 29 Misc. Rep. 719 . … Rodgers v. Coler, supra; People ex rel. Allison v. Board of Education, supra; People ex rel. McIntyre v. Coler, 35 Misc. Rep. 454 .

Simsohn v. Southern Co-operative Building & Loan Ass'n

15 Pa. D. & C. 329 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 6, 1931

The recent cases of Brown v. Victor Building Ass’n, 302 Pa. 254 , and Stone v. Schiller B. & L. … In addition there is Assigned Estate of Brown Building and Loan Assocition, 12 W. N.

Ward La France Truck Corp. v. City of New York

7 Misc. 2d 739 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1957

The Board of Responsibility is properly constituted by section 343 of the charter and section 5 of the Board of Estimate Resolution, and its authority has been judicially recognized (Epstein Co. v. … Furthermore, as far as the record discloses, the witnesses were not sworn, an omission of a specific element of a fair trial prescribed in Matter of Hecht v. Monaghan (supra).

Arctic Fire Insurance v. Austin

6 Thomp. & Cook 63 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

In Chapman v. New Haven R. R. Co., 19 N. … In Brown v. N. Y. Cent. R. R. Co., 32 N.

White v. Brownell

4 Abb. Pr. 162 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1868

L. & Eq., 592 ; Fassett v. First Parish in Boyleston, 19 Pick., 361 ). This board of stock brokers is in fact analogous to the organization which came under consideration in Caldicott v. … Philadelphia Club, 50 Pa.,107; Bagg’s Case, 11 Coke, 93 ; Earle’s Case, Carth., 173 ; Commonwealth v. St. Patrick Benevolent Society, 2 Binn., 441 ; Fuller v. Trustees of Plainfield Academy, 6 Conn., 533 ; People v.

Bonacker v. Chuckrow

166 Misc. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1938

Way, 179 id. 174; Matter of Tamney v. … Smith v. Schiellein¡ 95 N. Y. 124, 132, 133 . See, also, People ex rel. Sturtevant v. Armstrong, 116 App. Div. 103.)

Adames v. Velasquez

19 Misc. 3d 881 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2008

In Brown v Shyne ( 242 NY 176 [1926]), the plaintiff sought treatment for her disease or physical condition from a chiropractor who had no license to practice medicine. … Bennett, Chancellor of the New York State Board of Regents; and Honorable Merryl H.

Lerner v. Prince

36 Misc. 3d 297 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 2012

having made the effort to obtain board action (see Grimes v Donald, 673 A2d 1207, 1216 [Del 1996], overruled in part on other grounds Brehm v Eisner, 746 A2d 244, 253 [Del 2000]). … Therefore, when a board refuses a demand, the only issues to be examined are the good faith and reasonableness of its investigation’ ” (Levine v Smith, 591 A2d at 212 , quoting Spiegel v Buntrock, 571 A2d 767, 777 [Del 1990

Pierce v. Mannion

180 Misc. 775 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1943

(See Matter of Stanley v. Board of Appeals of Piermont, 168 Misc. 797 .) … Since section 1300 of the Civil Practice Act enables this court to grant the petitioner the relief to which he deems he is entitled and direct appropriate action by the respondents (Matter of Stanley v.

Scranton Times v. Entercom Wilkes-Barre Scranton LLC

23 Pa. D. & C.5th 517 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Mar 24, 2011

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. City Council of Philadelphia, 593 Pa. 241, 277-278 , 928 A.2d 1255, 1277 (2007); Pennsylvania State Education Association v. Com., Office of Open Records, 981 A.2d 383 , 385 (Pa. … Browne Drug Company v. Cococare Products, Inc., 538 F.3d 185, 199 (3d Cir. 2008); Commerce National Insurance Services.