Case law

Brown v. Rice

43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1885

Higginson v. Brown

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 467 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

Brown v. Decker

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 199 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1880

course of the trial many exceptions were taken on behalf of the defendant, relating to tlie proof by which the plaintiff sought to establish his title to the judgment as the assignee of the bank, by a resolution of its board

Atwell v. Brown

3 Thomp. & Cook 779 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1874

Wells v. Brown

13 Wend. 374 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1835

Wells sued Brown and Wellington in a justice’s court. The defendants obtained a verdict, and judgment was rendered in their favor.

Brown v. Eastman

16 N.H. 588 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1845

Stone v. Ashley, 13 N. H. 38. … Montgomery v. Dorion, 6 N. H. 250.

Brown v. George

17 N.H. 128 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1845

The defendant did not in terms promise, to pay the plaintiff, in case Albert Brown failed so to do. … No liability then rested upon Brown, or upon any one else.

Brown v. Copp

5 N.H. 346 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jan 15, 1831

The case of Creig v. Talbot, 2 B. & C. 119, is an authority directly in point.

Brown v. Gale

5 N.H. 416 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Aug 15, 1831

. & E. 88, Jones v. Roe ; 2 M. & S. 165, Doe v. Tomkinson ; 1 H. Bl. 30, Roe v. Jones. … This distinction is recognised by Lord Holt, with respect to the chattel interests of a wife, in Gage v. Acton, 1 Salkeld, 325 : Com. Dig. u Baron & Feme,” K ; Com. Rep. 67.

Brown v. Hoit

1 Smith & H. 53 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Feb 15, 1804

See Hilton v. … Tracy v. Perry, 1831, 5 N. H. 504.

Brown v. Fitz

13 N.H. 283 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1842

Brown at the time to which the witness refers, the instrument should be produced, or its absence accounted for; and unless that be done, there will be no evidence of property in the plaintiff. … Brown, and that from them it cannot be inferred that there was an instrument in writing, that being unnecessary. The other point in the case is settled by the authorities.

Brown v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 283 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 8, 1979

Brown is not entitled to that pay period from the Department of Labor. He is, therefore, entitled to only 16 pay periods as opposed to the 17 for which he made claim. Except for the fact that Mr. … Brown was employed by the State of Illinois on June 30, 1978, the issues raised in this case are identical to those in the case of John J. Beard v. State of Illinois, 78-CC-1585.

Brown v. State

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 194 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 18, 1950

Brown started to pick up a piece of concrete. As he lifted, he felt a sharp pain in his right hip region. Although the pain persisted, Mr. Brown continued working. He consulted his family physician, Dr. J. … Rufus Brown, who was operated upon on December 7, 1948 at Barnes Hospital, was seen on June 9, 1949. He had moderate limitation of back motions in all directions.

Brown v. State

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 366 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 12, 1927

Brown v. State

22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 231 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 10, 1956

On August 16, 1953, claimant, Iva Ann Brown, a resident of St. Louis, Missouri, attended the Illinois State Fair at Springfield, Illinois.

Boyd v. Brown

12 Va. Cir. 54 · Newport News County Circuit Court · Aug 15, 1986

(the plaintiff), defendants City and its employees and defendant Cleveland Brown (defendant Brown) were present by counsel. … Worth Distributors, Inc. v. Gertrude G.

Brown v. Porter

2 Mich. N.P. 12 · Circuit Court of the 22nd Circuit of Michigan · Dec 15, 1870

Brown v. Hollister

1 Mich. N.P. 26 · Circuit Court of the 9th Circuit of Michigan · Nov 15, 1869

Brown, J. This is an appeal from the decission of the Clerk, in taxing as a part of plaintiff’s bill of ^osts, witness fees *27 and milage for the attendance at Court of one of the plaintiffs. … Had he made no assignment to Brown, the rule would be the same, if his attendance was necessary, as a witness, and his presence in Court' was for the sole purpose of testifying.

People v. Brown

166 Misc. 2d 539 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1995

Board of defendant’s cooperation in this matter. … Jennings’ cooperation she would write a favorable letter to the Parole Board on Mr. Jennings’ behalf.

Bennett v. Brown

31 Barb. 158 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1857

The referee has decided, and the correctness of this decision cannot be questioned under the decision of this court in Ball v. … It therefore does not come within the case of Fenno v. Dickinson, ( 4 Denio, 84 .)