Case law

Randall v. Hoff

4 Misc. 2d 376 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1957

cite Todd v. … Board of Educ. ( 272 App. Div. 618 , affd. 297 N. Y. 873 ).

Russell v. Burton

66 Barb. 539 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1867

(Ball v. Loomis, 29 N. Y. 412 . Merrill v. Grinnell, 30 id. 594. Woodruff v. McGrath, 32 id. 255. Davis v. Allen, 3 id. 168. Westerlo v. De Witt, 36 id. 340. Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. 533 -537. Dunning v. … Brown, J., says, in Mills v.

Christian Hill Properties, LLC v. Appeals Board of the Town of Casco

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 13, 2024

Board. … Silsby v. Belch, 2008 ME 104, 'if 6, 952 A.2d 218.

Davis v. School District

35 Pa. D. & C. 190 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 21, 1939

In 1938 the tax fixed and attempted to be collected by the Philadelphia board was challenged upon constitutional grounds, and in the case of Wilson et ux. v. … Jones, 203 Pa. 47, 50 (1902); Commonwealth ex rel. v. Middleton, 210 Pa. 582, 590 (1905) ; Young et al. v. Fetterolf et al., 320 Pa. 289, 302 (1936) ; Commonwealth ex rel. v. Brown, 210 Pa. 29, 37 (1904).

In re Brown

45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 476 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 6, 1992

Lillie Barbara Brown, wife of the deceased victim, Lee E. Brown, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. … National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. State (1983), 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 265 . The Court cannot award damages on the basis of conjecture. (In re Application of Lopez (1987), 39 Ill. Ct. Cl. 315 .)

Fleischmann v. Graves

118 Misc. 214 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1922

Kiehm v. Board of Education, 198 App. Div. 476 ; Freeman v. Brooks, 29 Misc. Rep. 719 . … Rodgers v. Coler, supra; People ex rel. Allison v. Board of Education, supra; People ex rel. McIntyre v. Coler, 35 Misc. Rep. 454 .

Roosevelt v. Mayor of New York

1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 205 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 15, 1884

Canal Board, 55 N. Y., 390 ). … These allegations are denied by some of the members of the board of aldermen.

Cummings v. Regan

76 Misc. 2d 137 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1973

Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole, 363 F. Supp. 416 [give reasons for denial of parole]; Melson v. … Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole, 363 F. Supp. 416, 419 , supra.) A challenge to the discretion of the board may be a matter for another day.

Furman v. Haskin

2 Cai. Cas. 369 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1805

Tindal v. Brown, 1 D. & E. 168. … B. in tbe case of Brown v. Davies, 3 D. & E. 80. If the defendant here be allowed to set up tbe same defence as be would have done if Buckle was tbe defendant, tbe facts stated in tbe plea constitute a valid defence.

White v. Brownell

4 Abb. Pr. 162 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1868

L. & Eq., 592 ; Fassett v. First Parish in Boyleston, 19 Pick., 361 ). This board of stock brokers is in fact analogous to the organization which came under consideration in Caldicott v. … Philadelphia Club, 50 Pa.,107; Bagg’s Case, 11 Coke, 93 ; Earle’s Case, Carth., 173 ; Commonwealth v. St. Patrick Benevolent Society, 2 Binn., 441 ; Fuller v. Trustees of Plainfield Academy, 6 Conn., 533 ; People v.

BusTop Shelters, Inc. v. City of New York

99 Misc. 2d 198 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1978

and conditions in granting a franchise, citing Loos v City of New York ( 257 App Div 219, 223 ) and Matter of Merced v Fisher ( 38 NY2d 557, 559 ). … In order to give legal effect to actions by the Board of Estimate, its determinations must be based on facts. (Matter of Kayfield Constr. Corp. v Morris, 14 AD2d 769 .)

Marr v. Arthur

36 Va. Cir. 527 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Aug 16, 1995

In Bradner v. … The other line of cases consisted of Brown v. Huddleston, 213 Va. 146 , 191 S.E.2d 234 (1972), where a $1,500 verdict on specials of $6,420 was allowed to stand; May v.

Solari v. Vincent

77 Misc. 2d 54 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1974

State Board of Parole, 293 N. Y. 254, 257 ; People ex rel. Schuster v. Vincent, 42 A D 2d 596, 597). … Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. S. Board of Parole ( 363 F. Supp. 416 ; Matter of Cummings v. Regan, 76 Misc 2d 137 ; Matter of Hamm v. Regan , 43 A D 2d 344; Matter of Cummings v.

Bonacker v. Chuckrow

166 Misc. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1938

Way, 179 id. 174; Matter of Tamney v. … Smith v. Schiellein¡ 95 N. Y. 124, 132, 133 . See, also, People ex rel. Sturtevant v. Armstrong, 116 App. Div. 103.)

People v. Jardin

154 Misc. 2d 172 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1992

(See, People v Sanders, 56 NY2d 51, 64 [1982]; see also, People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518-519 [1987]; People v Caviness, 38 NY2d 227, 231 [1975].) … (See, People v Brown, 179 AD2d 485 [1st Dept 1992]; People v Luke, 136 Misc 2d 733, 734-739 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1987], affd 147 AD2d 990 [1st Dept 1989]; People v Watson, 100 AD2d 452, 463-469 [2d Dept 1984].)

McCrea v. Pine Tp. School Dist.

145 Pa. 550 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 9, 1891

In Whitehead v. … him; and that the action of the board, if it be properly entered upon the minutes in the form and manner required by the statute, in case of a dismissal is conclusive, unless the board can be shown to have acted corruptly

Village of Flushing v. Carraher

33 N.Y.S. 951 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1895

People v. Board of Health of the City of Yonkers, 140 N. Y. 1 , 35 N. E. 320 . This case does not fall within that principle. … But, on a violation of an order of the health board under the second power, the party would, under the authority of People v.

McMeekan v. Department of Health

157 Misc. 620 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1935

Tuck v. … Brady v.

Steinbacher v. Mariano

19 Pa. D. & C.4th 399 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · May 8, 1992

In Sanderson v. Frank S. … Baldwin v. McGrath, 8 D.

Blood v. Goodrich

12 Wend. 525 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1834

Brown, of Bloomfield, Ohio, and requested witness and plaintiff to call on Brown to show them the lands, On cross examination, the witness stated further, that Goodrich said, when the contract was shown to him, that Kingsbury … In the former discussion of this case, 9 Wendell, 76 , and also in Hanford v. M’Nair, 9 id. 56, the case of Striglitz v.