Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.09s

  • Anonymous v. Weiner

    50 Misc. 2d 380 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1966

    (Paraphrasing Day-Brite Light, v. Missouri, 342 U. S. 421, 423 .) … (See Matter of Harwood v. Cornelius, 21 A D 2d 961, 962; Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380 .) “ There is no estoppel countenanced by the courts against public officials performing their legal duty.”

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Drucker v. Frisina

    31 Misc. 2d 469 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1961

    The village contends that petitioner must exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Appeals, because under article XIV (§ III [b]) the board has authority “ where an appeal is taken for a variance to permit … (Food Corp. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 288, 290-291 ; italics in original.) Fryer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Mgrs. of St. Nicholas Ct. Condominium v. Jackson

    2024 NY Slip Op 31364(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 18, 2024

    Board of Mgrs. of St. Nicholas Ct. … See Mittman v Board of Mgrs. of Bayside Plaza Condominium, 43 Misc. 3d 1208(A) (Sup. Ct. Queens Cty. 2014) (quoting Bd. of Managers of Lido Beach Towers Condominium v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Amelius v. Grand Imperial LLC

    57 Misc. 3d 835 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 11, 2017

    Transp. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 253 AD2d 330, 337 [1st Dept 1999], lvs denied 93 NY2d 808 [1999]; Matter of Kenton Assoc. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 225 AD2d 349, 350 [1st Dept 1996].) E. … A. v Brown, 564 US 915, 925 [2011].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roosevelt v. Mayor of New York

    1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 205 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 15, 1884

    Canal Board, 55 N. Y., 390 ). … These allegations are denied by some of the members of the board of aldermen.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mohr v. Schroeder

    162 Misc. 2d 584 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1994

    Any such investigation, therefore, must be made with Board authority, in this case by agreement of both Commissioners pursuant to Election Law § 3-212 (see, Matter of Lenihan v Blackwell, — AD2d —, 1994 NY Slip Op 09846 [ … If the State Board then determines that an investigation is required, it can either conduct same, or direct the County Board to do so.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Board of Mgrs. 229 W. 43rd St. Condominium

    2025 NY Slip Op 31241(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 11, 2025

    Wilmington Trust, N.A. v Board of Mgrs. 229 W. 43rd St. … Ams. v Vitellas, 131 AD3d 52, 59-60 [2d Dept 2015]; see also Brunner v Estate of Lax, 137 AD3d 553, 553 [1st Dept 2016].)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Levine v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

    4 Pa. D. & C. 269 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 2, 1923

    Under the decisions of our Supreme Court, notably in Stockton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 260 Pa. 372 ; Wolf v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 252 Pa. 448 ; Boring v. … Superior Ct. 230 ; Long v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 281 , and Brown v. Traction Co., 14 Pa. Superior Ct. 594 , Mrs. Tyrrell was guilty of contributory negligence.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland

    176 Misc. 258 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1941

    (Matter of Wallach’s, Inc., v. Boland, 253 App. Div. 371 ; affd., 277 N. Y. 345 . See, also, N. L. R. B. v. Falk Corp., 308 U. S. 453 ; Amer. Fed. of Labor v. N.L.R. B., Id. 401; N. L. R. B. v. … In that case (Bank of Yorktown v. Boland, 280 N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Courtney v. Board of Mgrs. of the Chadwin House Condominium

    2024 NY Slip Op 31133(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 3, 2024

    Courtney v Board of Mgrs. of the Chadwin House Condominium 2024 NY Slip Op 31133(U) April 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: … good faith, and in furtherance of the condominium's legitimate interests" ( Skouras v Victoria Hall Condominium, 73 AD3d 902 [2d Dept 2010)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lloyds v. United Press International, Inc.

    63 Misc. 2d 421 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1970

    Brown sought a further report from Mr. … Brown, Mr. Haughton and Mr. Lloyds. Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Peckham Industries, Inc. v. Ross

    61 Misc. 2d 616 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1970

    Yacht Club v. Board of Appeals, 32 Misc 2d 677 ). The first condition requires that petitioner improve an existing road known as Burdick Ro.ad running from the quarry site to Route 311. … While the planning board is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance to regulate the location, height and bulk of buildings, there is no provision for compelling buildings to be constructed (see Betty-June School v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Glen Truck Sales & Service, Inc. v. Sirignano

    31 Misc. 2d 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1961

    Corp. v. City of New York, 18 Misc 2d 106 ; Matter of Kniska v. Splain, 201 Misc. 729 ; Matter of Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. … Co. v. City of Cleveland, 70 Ohio Law Abst. 303 .) Thus, in Pascoe v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Morris v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

    40 Misc. 3d 226 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2013

    v Travis, 10 AD3d 828 [3d Dept 2004]), it is the obligation of the Parole Board to give fair consideration 7 to each of the statutory factors, and where, as here, the record convincingly demonstrates that the Board in fact … See Thwaites v. New York State Board of Parole, 34 Misc 3d 694 . See also Lichtel v. Travis, 287 AD2d 83 .”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stella v. O'Rourke

    58 Misc. 2d 1041 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1968

    This was based .on subdivision 5 of section 330 of the Election Law and on the authority of Matter of Rice v. … In Matter of Rice v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • AMT CADC Venture, LLC v. 455 CPW, L.L.C.

    45 Misc. 3d 176 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2013

    (See Bankers Trust Co. v Board of Mgrs. of Park 900 Condominium, 81 NY2d 1033, 1035 [1993]; Cadlerock Joint Venture v Board of Mgrs. of Parkchester S. Condominium, 289 AD2d 1 [1st Dept 2001].) A. … (Pekelnaya v Allyn, 25 AD3d 111, 118 [1st Dept 2005].) Board of Mgrs. of Parkchester N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Liguori v. Beloten

    26 Misc. 3d 593 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2009

    Matter of Featherstone v Franco, 95 NY2d 550, 554 (2000), quoting CPLR 7803 (3). . Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … Corp. v McBarnette, 84 NY2d 194, 204 (1994). . Board of Regents of State Colleges v Roth, 408 US 564, 573 (1972); see e.g.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Steinbacher v. Mariano

    19 Pa. D. & C.4th 399 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · May 8, 1992

    In Sanderson v. Frank S. … Baldwin v. McGrath, 8 D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Markovich v. Feriola

    41 Misc. 2d 1051 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1963

    the discretionary acts of the hundreds of town boards and town zoning boards in this State ” (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. … Matter of Crossroads Recreation v. Broz, 4 N Y 2d 39; Matter of Stillman v. Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N. Y., 247 N. Y. 599 , affg. 222 App. Div. 19 ; Matter of Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App. Div. 348 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Sacchitella

    73 Misc. 2d 678 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1973

    (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 ; People v. Savvides, 1 N Y 2d 554; Miller v. Pate, 386 U. S. 1 ; Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penetentiary, 331 F. 2d 842 .) … (People v. Matera, 52 Misc 2d 674 ; People v. Whitmore, 45 Misc 2d 506 ; Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, supra; Ellis v. United States, 345 F. 2d 961 ; United States ex rel. Meers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.