Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • Miller v. White

    8 Abb. Pr. 46 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1870

    In Squires v. Brown ( 22 How. … In Belmont v. Coleman ( 21 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jennings v. Kern

    134 Misc. 2d 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1987

    Board of Appeals, Vil. of Southampton, 50 Misc 2d 205 , affd 27 AD2d 705 ; Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ) because the right to use the substandard parcel is a vested one (Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals … (See also, Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ; Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals, 28 AD2d 848 ; Matter of Mandalay Constr. v Eccleston, 9 AD2d 918 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCrea v. Pine Tp. School Dist.

    145 Pa. 550 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 9, 1891

    In Whitehead v. … him; and that the action of the board, if it be properly entered upon the minutes in the form and manner required by the statute, in case of a dismissal is conclusive, unless the board can be shown to have acted corruptly

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. Pleydell

    178 Misc. 562 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1942

    (Shewan & Sons, Inc., v. Mills, 211 App. Div. 687, 692, 693 .) This is certainly true where the board of estimate which adopted the resolutions has given way to a newly constituted board. … (Matter of Warehousemen’s Assn. v. Cosgrove, 241 N. Y. 580, 581 ; Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 id. 464, 469; Matter of Coombs v. Edwards, 280 id. 361, 364.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Garden City Jewish Center v. Incorporated Village of Garden City

    2 Misc. 2d 1009 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1956

    This analysis of the respective roles of the board of appeals and the board of trustees is supported by the decisions in Matter of Community Synagogue v. Bates (1 N Y 2d 445, supra) and Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. … In Matter of Diocese of Rochester v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Emmerling v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    2017 Ohio 9066 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County · Dec 12, 2017

    Brewer v. … Elston v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Engel

    200 Misc. 60 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Jan 23, 1951

    In Matter of Koral v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 197 Misc. 221 ) Mr. … The Ferdinand case (supra) is cited in Matter of Goldway v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Marr v. Arthur

    36 Va. Cir. 527 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Aug 16, 1995

    In Bradner v. … The other line of cases consisted of Brown v. Huddleston, 213 Va. 146 , 191 S.E.2d 234 (1972), where a $1,500 verdict on specials of $6,420 was allowed to stand; May v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Feneck v. Murdock

    16 Misc. 2d 789 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1958

    Assn. v. … Board of Standards & Appeals, 278 App. Div. 659 , affd. 302 N. Y. 920 ; Matter of Levy v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 267 N. Y. 347 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kreisberg v. Scheyer

    11 Misc. 3d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2006

    makes no allegations that warrant a new hearing (see, Matter of Sammartino v Scheyer, 24 AD3d 681 [2005]; Matter of Matherson v Scheyer, 20 AD3d 425 [2005]; Matter of Lee v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Putnam Val., 1 … of lack of neighborhood opposition (see, Caper v Parker, 271 App Div 839 [1946]; Matter of Morehouse v Town of Horicon Planning Bd., 85 AD2d 769 [1981]; Matter of Josato, Inc. v Wright, 288 AD2d 384 [2001]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shaker Coventry Corp. v. Shaker Heights Planning Commission

    86 Ohio Law. Abs. 47 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Mar 24, 1961

    John V. Corrigan, J. … Lorain County Savings & Trust Co., v. Board of County Commrs. of Lorain County, ante, 306; State, ex rel. Gund Co., v. Village of Solon, ante, 318; State, ex rel. Grant, Exr., v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Griest v. Hooey

    205 Misc. 396 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1954

    Board of Stds. & Appeals, 253 N. Y. 594 ; Town of Greece v. Smith, 256 App. Div. 886 ; Matter of Riker v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 225 App. Div. 570 ; and cf. Matter of Reed v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 230 App. … Y. 701 ; Matter of Holy Sepulchre Cemetery v. Board of Appeals of Town of Greece, 271 App. Div. 33 , 40; Matter of Magde v. Crowley, 200 Misc. 109 ; Matter of Arlington v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 204 Misc. 395 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Colwell

    30 N.Y.S. 880 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1894

    BROWN, P. J. This action was brought to recover for alleged services rendered by the plaintiff for the defendants. … Such is the rule stated in Lowenstein v. Salinger (Sup.) 17 N. Y. Supp. 70 ; Brown v. Wigton (Sup.) 18 N. Y. Supp. 490 ; and Johnson v. Trim Co., 79 Hun, 407 , 29 N. Y. Supp. 797 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Jardin

    154 Misc. 2d 172 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1992

    (See, People v Sanders, 56 NY2d 51, 64 [1982]; see also, People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518-519 [1987]; People v Caviness, 38 NY2d 227, 231 [1975].) … (See, People v Brown, 179 AD2d 485 [1st Dept 1992]; People v Luke, 136 Misc 2d 733, 734-739 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1987], affd 147 AD2d 990 [1st Dept 1989]; People v Watson, 100 AD2d 452, 463-469 [2d Dept 1984].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Moll v. Moll

    187 Misc. 2d 770 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2001

    Holly, chairman of the Board of Sage Rutty & Company, Inc. Mr. … The O’Brien analysis is not limited to professional licenses and has been used to find a medical board certification (Savasta v Savasta, 146 Misv 2d 101 [Sup Ct, Nassau County]), a law degree (Cronin v Cronin, 131 Misc 2d

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Rockefeller

    45 Misc. 2d 778 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1965

    (Matter of Pelham Jewish Center v. Board of Trustees, 9 Misc 2d 564 , affd. 6 A D 2d 710; see, also, Matter of Spano v. Close, 266 App. Div. 1023 ; Matter of Fisenne v. Bay Ridge Dist. Local Bd., 250 App. … Sonneborn v. Sylvester, 132 N. W. 2d 249 [Wis.], (County Boards of Supervisors); Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of City of Baltimore, 234 F. Supp. 945 (City Council); Bianchi v. Griffing, 238 F.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Kelley

    191 Misc. 762 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1948

    Hummel v. Trial Term, 184 N. … (Matter of Wallach's, Inc., v. Boland, 277 N. Y. 345 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Russo v. Stevens

    10 Misc. 2d 530 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1958

    A Zoning Board of Appeals may act upon its own knowledge of conditions or may make its own survey. (Matter of Community Synagogue v. Bates, 1 N Y 2d 445; Matter of Levy v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 267 N. … Church v. Walsh, 244 3NL Y. 280; Ma:tter of Gilbert v. Stevens, 284 App. Div. 1016 .)

    Reversed on other grounds by Russo v. Stevens, 7 A.D.2d 575 (1959)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • O'Hara v. Henderson

    74 Misc. 2d 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1973

    The court has no power to reconsider the minimum term which it has fixed, provided it has imposed a legal sentence (Matter of Lyons v. Robinson, 293 N. Y. 191,196 ). … (Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 31 .) ” Accordingly, the relief sought is denied and judgment is directed dismissing the proceeding (CPLR art. 78) on the merits.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Brown

    45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 476 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 6, 1992

    Lillie Barbara Brown, wife of the deceased victim, Lee E. Brown, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. … National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. State (1983), 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 265 . The Court cannot award damages on the basis of conjecture. (In re Application of Lopez (1987), 39 Ill. Ct. Cl. 315 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.