Case law

Costello v. Frederick County Sanitation Authority

49 Va. Cir. 41 · Frederick County Circuit Court · Apr 9, 1999

See, e.g., Chaffinch v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co., 227 Va. 68 (1984); Burns v. Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, 218 Va. 625 (1977); Stroobants v. Fugate, 209 Va. 275 (1968); Heldt v. … See, e.g., Prendergast v. Northern Va. Regional Park Auth., 227 Va. 190 (1984); Burns v. Board of Supervisors, 218 Va. 625 (1977).

Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. Pleydell

178 Misc. 562 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1942

(Shewan & Sons, Inc., v. Mills, 211 App. Div. 687, 692, 693 .) This is certainly true where the board of estimate which adopted the resolutions has given way to a newly constituted board. … (Matter of Warehousemen’s Assn. v. Cosgrove, 241 N. Y. 580, 581 ; Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 id. 464, 469; Matter of Coombs v. Edwards, 280 id. 361, 364.)

Dushane v. Kazmierczak

192 Misc. 23 · New York Supreme Court · May 20, 1948

As to the second branch of the resolution, the board calls attention to the case of Matter of Board of Education of City of N. Y. v. Cole ( 261 App. … Patterson v. Board of Education ( 295 N.

Raynolds v. Browning, King & Co.

123 Misc. 367 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1924

Orr v. Doubleday, Page & Co., 223 N. Y. 334 ; Swan v. Inderlied, 187 id. 372 ; Masset v. Ruh, 235 id. 462 ; Crimmins v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R. Co., 87 Hun, 187 ; Storms v. Manhattan Railway Co., 178 N. Y. 493 .) … See, also, Masset v. Ruh, supra, citing with approval and following Orr v. Doubleday, Page & Co., supra. In the case of Swan v.

Bell v. Dagg

2 Thomp. & Cook 623 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874

When it became due it was not paid, and plain tiff' brought an action upon it against Brown. Brown, defending, alleged that the signature of his name to the note was a forgery. … Delaware Bank v. Jarvis, 20 N. Y. 228 ; Fake v. Smith, 7 Abb. N. S. 106; Whitney v. Nat. Bank of Potsdam, 45 N. Y. 303 .

Feneck v. Murdock

16 Misc. 2d 789 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1958

Assn. v. … Board of Standards & Appeals, 278 App. Div. 659 , affd. 302 N. Y. 920 ; Matter of Levy v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 267 N. Y. 347 ).

Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. of Warrensville Heights School Dist.

39 Ohio Misc. 108 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Mar 18, 1974

Kohr, v. Hooker, supra. See, also, Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 . As stated, E. … Perry v. *116 Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 . In Hale v.

Retan v. Mathewson

131 Misc. 106 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1927

(Todaro v. Todaro, 120 Misc. 807 ; Lazarczyk v. Lazarczyk, 121 id. 723; 122 id. 536; Foley v. Foley, Id. 663, 664.) … Our statutes provide not only for a divorce, but for a .separation from bed and board.

People ex rel. Kannensohn Holding Corp. v. Walsh

120 Misc. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1923

Cockcroft v. Miller, supra, 709 . … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N.

Burke v. Rhoads

39 Misc. 208 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1902

Elwood Investors Co. v. Behme

79 Misc. 2d 910 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1974

Schechter, 1 N Y 2d 604; Matter of Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 6 v. Board of Co-op. Educ. Servs., 41 Misc 2d 699 ; Matter of Myricks v. Kennedy, 6 Misc 2d 854 ; cf. Matter of Village of Island Park v. … Since the board’s decision was not a nullity, petitioner has shown no clear legal right to the relief requested (Toscano v. McGoldrick, 300 N. Y. 156 ; Matter of Buffalo Red-I-Mix Concrete Corp. v. Foell, 1 A D 2d 762).

Kreisberg v. Scheyer

11 Misc. 3d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2006

makes no allegations that warrant a new hearing (see, Matter of Sammartino v Scheyer, 24 AD3d 681 [2005]; Matter of Matherson v Scheyer, 20 AD3d 425 [2005]; Matter of Lee v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Putnam Val., 1 … of lack of neighborhood opposition (see, Caper v Parker, 271 App Div 839 [1946]; Matter of Morehouse v Town of Horicon Planning Bd., 85 AD2d 769 [1981]; Matter of Josato, Inc. v Wright, 288 AD2d 384 [2001]).

C Ten 31 LLC v. Tarbox

2025 Tex. Bus. 1 · Texas Business Court · Jan 3, 2025

Summer Moon is governed by a Board of Managers (the Board), made up of three managers— one manager designated by minority owner CTen 31 LLC (CTen) and two managers designated by majority owner Coffee Unplugged, LLC (CU … Plasma Fab, LLC, 519 S.W.3d 76, 86 (Tex. 2017); see also City of Denton v. Grim, 694 S.W.3d 210, 214 (Tex. 2024); Brown v. City of Houston, 660 S.W.3d 749, 752 (Tex. 2023); Alex Sheshunoff Mgmt. Servs., L.P. v.

Commonwealth v. Long

82 Va. Cir. 544 · Circuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orange County · Apr 20, 2007

Pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), Stover v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 789 , 180 S.E.2d 504 (1971), and Dozier v. … Specifically, in Keener v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.

Miller v. White

8 Abb. Pr. 46 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1870

In Squires v. Brown ( 22 How. … In Belmont v. Coleman ( 21 N.

Jennings v. Kern

134 Misc. 2d 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1987

Board of Appeals, Vil. of Southampton, 50 Misc 2d 205 , affd 27 AD2d 705 ; Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ) because the right to use the substandard parcel is a vested one (Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals … (See also, Matter of Dittmer v Epstein, 34 AD2d 675 ; Matter of Bexson v Board of Zoning & Appeals, 28 AD2d 848 ; Matter of Mandalay Constr. v Eccleston, 9 AD2d 918 .)

McCrea v. Pine Tp. School Dist.

145 Pa. 550 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 9, 1891

In Whitehead v. … him; and that the action of the board, if it be properly entered upon the minutes in the form and manner required by the statute, in case of a dismissal is conclusive, unless the board can be shown to have acted corruptly

Evans v. Gardner

71 Misc. 2d 283 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1972

It also provides that personal service may be made upon a member of such board or commission.” ( 44 Misc 2d 985, 986 , supra). To similar effect, see the dictum in Matter of Pearl v. … of Camillus v.

Anonymous v. Weiner

50 Misc. 2d 380 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1966

(Paraphrasing Day-Brite Light, v. Missouri, 342 U. S. 421, 423 .) … (See Matter of Harwood v. Cornelius, 21 A D 2d 961, 962; Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380 .) “ There is no estoppel countenanced by the courts against public officials performing their legal duty.”

Emmerling v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

2017 Ohio 9066 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County · Dec 12, 2017

Brewer v. … Elston v.