Case law

In re Brown's Will

16 Fla. Supp. 120 · Sarasota County Judge's Court · Jul 28, 1960

Millican, attorney and guardian ad litem for the minor beneficiaries under the last will and testament of Mary Horniman Brown. … See Johnson v. Burlson (Fla. 1952), 61 So. 2d 170 .

Blanchard v. Ely

21 Wend. 342 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1839

The damages are what will restore the value of the cargo on ship board at the port of departure. Id. 46, et seq. The rule is nearly the same , in respect to damages for breach of warranty. … Brown, 4 Bibb, 91 .

Meltex, Inc. v. Livingston

208 Misc. 1033 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1955

Picketing accompanied by violence of course may be enjoined (Hotel Employees’ Local v. Board, 315 U. … But my understanding of Martin v. Curran ( 303 N. Y. 276 ) and Brown v. Hibbets ( 290 N.

H & H Plumbing, Heating & Electric Co. v. State

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 21, 1984

H & H had submitted a bid to the Capital Development Board, hereinafter referred to as CDB, for construction work at the Ziegler Elementary School, which work included a sewage treatment plant facility.

McCormick v. McCann

57 Ohio Law. Abs. 203 · Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 27, 1950

In Miller v. … In that case Miller was precluded from disadvantaging Brown, who had advantaged Miller at Brown’s own expense. The opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court in the case of William Hieatt v.

Poe v. Supervisors of Elections

4 Balt. C. Rep. 8 · Baltimore City Court · Mar 26, 1919

Johnson Poe petitions the Baltimore City Court for a writ of mandamus directed to the Board of Registry of the Second Precinct of the Eleventh Ward of Baltimore, requiring them to enter his name upon the register of voters … he was again called into the service of the United States with his regiment and has been constantly absent from the City in the service until January 20, 1919, and has, therefore, had no opportunity to appear before the Board

Heath v. New York Safety Reserve Fund

69 Misc. 452 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1910

Brown, J. On the 7th day of April, 1884, the Southern Tier Masonic Belief Association issued to John S. … of all dues and assessments for which he might become liable and to conform in all respects to the by-laws, rules and regulations of the association then in force or which might thereafter be adopted by the same or its board

Hofstra College v. Wilmerding

24 Misc. 2d 248 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1960

Board of Standards & Appeals, 263 App. Div. 352 , revd. on other grounds 290 N. Y. 109 ; Matter of Robusto v. Tibbetts, 277 App. … The board having failed to consider less restricted districts, this court may not do so (Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46, 50 ).

Perez v. City of New York

9 Misc. 3d 934 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 2005

The cases cited by defendant in support of its position were commenced prior to the enactment of Laws of 2002 (ch 91), except for Gonzalez v Esparza ( 2003 WL 21834970 , 2003 US Dist LEXIS 13711 [SD NY, Aug. 6, 2003]), which … (See Goldes v City of New York, 19 AD3d 448 [2005] [a recent case where the Court was applying the pre-2002 Education Law].)

City of Cincinnati v. McMicken

6 Ohio C.C. 188 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Brown v. Maury, 6 Ohio, 129. And on the authority cited above, if not used, a court of chancery will compel a specific execution of the trust. … The Supreme Court in Board of Education v.

Commonwealth v. Shifflett

37 Va. Cir. 249 · Albemarle County Circuit Court · Sep 18, 1995

Nyboe v. Allen

10 Misc. 2d 895 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1958

(Matter of Board of Educ. of Ellicottville v. Allen, 283 App. Div. 376 ; Walcott v. Fisher, 274 App. Div. 339 , affd. 299 N. Y. 688 ; Bacon v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 205 Misc. 73, 77 , affd. 285 App. … (Hughes v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 249 App. Div. 158 ; Strum v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 194 Misc. 182 , affd. 277 App. Div. 855 , affd. 301 N. Y. 803 ; Matter of Cohen v. Board of Educ. of City of N.

Hackett v. Pickering

5 N.H. 19 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Aug 15, 1829

It does not appear, that judgment has ever been rendered in the action Brown v. Rollins ; for a default is not a judgment. … In this case it is stated, that judgment could not be' taken in the case of Brown v. Rollins, by reason of the loss of the note, on which that action was founded.

Place v. Hack

34 Misc. 2d 777 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Clearly the board did not act arbitrarily or capriciously. In Church v. … The Town Board’s action *782 in this instance was unanimous. ’ ’ In Wiggins v.

Mason v. Wade Furnace Co.

29 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 173 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 15, 1932

That distinguishes this case from Wiedeman Brewing Co., v. Herman, supra. The case of Brown v. Brown Automatic Coupling Hose Co., 18 C. C. (N. … In the case at bar the plaintiff alleges that he is a creditor, that his claim is past due, and he prays for judgment for that amount which was not prayed for in Brown v. Brown Automatic Coupling Hose Co., supra.

Watson v. Butcher

44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 391 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1885

(dissenting): We think the assignment in question in this case is void, for the reasons stated iu Dunham v. Watermam, ( 17 N. Y., 9 ), and kindred eases. … (Smith v. Beatty, 31 N. Y., 545 .) The assignment being void, it was proper to appoint a receiver in order to preserve the estate and to protect the rights of the plaintiffs and the other creditors. (Bloodgood v.

O'Hara v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 470

63 Pa. D. & C. 573 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 28, 1948

Phillips and V. … The consequence is that the parties are bound by the constitutions: Brown v. Lehman et al., 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 467 (1940); O’Neill et al. v. United, etc. Plumbers et al., 348 Pa. 531 (1944).

Horner v. Shepard

3 How. Pr. 16 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1846

Brown was irregular; Shepard, Babbitt, Hall and Brown were joint and several makers of the promissory note upon which the action was brought. … S. 377, sec. 1 ; Nelson v. Bostwick, 5 Hill, 37 ; Platner v. Johnson, 3 Hill, 476 ; Miller v. McGagg, 4 Hill, 35 .)

Royce v. Burt

42 Barb. 655 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1864

(Wood v. Jackson, 8 Wend. 9 , reversing Jackson v. Wood, 3 Wend. 27 . Lawrence v. Hunt, 10 id. 80 . Gardner v. Buckbee, 3 Cowen, 120. Burt v. Sternburgh, 4 id. 559.) … The case of Doty v. Brown, (4 Comst. 71,) is very much in point to sustain these views. In that case Doty brought replevin against Brown, for a quantity of hay and other property.

State v. Isaac

2018 Ohio 5433 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Meigs County · Dec 28, 2018

State v. Brown , 143 Ohio St.3d 444 , 2015-Ohio-2438 , 39 N.E.3d 496 , ¶ 23 ; see also State v. Brown , 99 Ohio St.3d 323 , 2003-Ohio-3931 , 792 N.E.2d 175 , ¶ 22. … Brown , a Lake Township patrol officer stopped Brown on Ohio's Interstate 280 after his vehicle crossed the solid white fog line for approximately one hundred feet. State v.