Case law

Elle v. Neenan

68 Misc. 2d 725 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1972

Likewise, in Tuck v. … Standard Oil Co., 127 Misc. 104 ; Town of Almond v. Penfold, 58 Misc 2d 780 ; Matter of Jalowiec v. Reile, 61 Misc 2d 909 ). The ‘ ‘ tentative approval ’ ’ of the Farash application is set aside.

Nones v. Homer

2 Hilt. 116 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Oct 15, 1858

Barnes, supra; King v. Brown, 2 Hill, 485 . … See King v. Brown, supra. The respondent was paid up to the 1st of October, 1857, but remained until the 26th of that month.

United States Reflector Co. v. Rushton

7 Daly 410 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jan 7, 1878

In Outwater v. … In Stone v. Browning ( 51 N.

Vitolo v. Chave

63 Misc. 2d 971 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1970

Randol (29 A D 2d 778); Matter of Moore v. Burchell (14 A D 2d 572, mot. for lv. to app. den. 10 N Y 2d 709); Matter of Lido Beach Civic Assn. v. Board of Zoning Appeals (13 A D 2d 1030); Point Lookout Civic Assn. v. … Newill, a member of the association who testified he lived within 300 feet (see Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325, 333 ; Matter of Haber v. Board of Estimate, 33 A D 2d 571; Matter of Moore v.

Pease v. Ryan

7 Ohio C.C. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1892

After due publication of the notice, numerous bids were filed upon printed forms with instructions furnished by said board, and for the various kinds of materials aforesaid. … The Board thereupon accepted the bid of Ryan for Medina stone, and entered into a contract with him.

Gatchell v. West

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 495 · Tuscarawas Circuit Court · Dec 9, 1910

People ex rel. Kurzman v. Green

14 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 231 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1876

People v. Corley

2025 NY Slip Op 25238 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Nov 3, 2025

People v. Meltzer & People v. … People v. Brown , 41 NY3d 279 , 297 (2023) (holding that the requirement for SORA registration for an unlawful imprisonment crime was a violation of due process) (quotation and citations omitted).

de Blasio v. New York City Conflict of Interest Bd.

2025 NY Slip Op 25008 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jan 13, 2025

In the COIB Order, the Board cites two prior Board decisions in support of its interpretation of the Charter. In COIB v. … See Schulz v.

Mack v. City of Buffalo

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 65 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1881

McCormick v. McCann

57 Ohio Law. Abs. 203 · Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 27, 1950

In Miller v. … In that case Miller was precluded from disadvantaging Brown, who had advantaged Miller at Brown’s own expense. The opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court in the case of William Hieatt v.

New York & New Haven R. R. v. Schuyler

1 Abb. Pr. 417 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1855

Trustees of Town of Huntington v. Nicholl, 3 Johns. 506 ; Brinckerhoff v. Brown, 6 John. Ch.R. 139). … Such was the nature of the case in Brinckerhoff v. Brown, ( 6 Johns. Ch. Rep. 139 ), commented on and approved in Fellows v. Fellows, ( 4 Cow. 682 ).

Amatulli v. Sweeney

33 Misc. 2d 324 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1962

The language of the court in Steward v. … (See, also, Balacek v. Board of Trustees, 26 N. Y. S. 2d 419, 425.)

Poe v. Supervisors of Elections

4 Balt. C. Rep. 8 · Baltimore City Court · Mar 26, 1919

Johnson Poe petitions the Baltimore City Court for a writ of mandamus directed to the Board of Registry of the Second Precinct of the Eleventh Ward of Baltimore, requiring them to enter his name upon the register of voters … he was again called into the service of the United States with his regiment and has been constantly absent from the City in the service until January 20, 1919, and has, therefore, had no opportunity to appear before the Board

State v. Rijos

43 Fla. Supp. 2d 83 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Sep 10, 1990

Trooper Green administered these tests under the direction of Trooper Brown. … Justus v State, 438 SO.2d 358, 365 (Fla. 1983). Accordingly, we reverse the order suppressing the videotape and remand this cause to the trial court for proceedings consistent herewith.

Perez v. City of New York

9 Misc. 3d 934 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 2005

The cases cited by defendant in support of its position were commenced prior to the enactment of Laws of 2002 (ch 91), except for Gonzalez v Esparza ( 2003 WL 21834970 , 2003 US Dist LEXIS 13711 [SD NY, Aug. 6, 2003]), which … (See Goldes v City of New York, 19 AD3d 448 [2005] [a recent case where the Court was applying the pre-2002 Education Law].)

Hofstra College v. Wilmerding

24 Misc. 2d 248 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1960

Board of Standards & Appeals, 263 App. Div. 352 , revd. on other grounds 290 N. Y. 109 ; Matter of Robusto v. Tibbetts, 277 App. … The board having failed to consider less restricted districts, this court may not do so (Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46, 50 ).

Lapham v. Roulan

10 Misc. 2d 152 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1957

Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 ; Matter of Hopkins v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 178 Misc. 186 ; Matter of Chad Homes v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 5 Misc. 2d 20 .) … (See Matter of Chad Homes v. Board of Appeals of City of Rochester, 5 Misc 2d 20, 23 , supra.)

Utilities & Industries Corp. v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

45 Misc. 2d 1014 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1965

Y. 157 ; Becker v. Frasse & Co., 255 N. Y. 10 ; Duttweiler v. Jacobs, 223 App. Div. 292 ). … The court cannot make a new contract for the parties under the guise of interpreting the writing (Friedman v. Handelman, 300 N. Y. 188 ; Brown v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 278 N. Y. 317 ; Graf v. Hope Bldg. Corp., 254 N.

In re St. Basil's Church of Utica

125 Misc. 526 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1925

Sheldon v. Board of Appeals ( 234 N. … Facey v. Leo, 110 Misc. 516 ; affd., 193 App. Div. 910 ; 230 N. Y. 602 ; People ex rel. Sheldon *535 v. Board, of Appeals, 234 id. 484; People ex rel. McAvoy v. Leo, 109 Misc. 255 ; People ex rel. Beinert v.