Case law

Advanced Transportation & Logistics, Inc. v. Botetourt County

79 Va. Cir. 359 · Botetourt County Circuit Court · Oct 5, 2009

Botetourt County (County) is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia and is governed by a Board of Supervisors (Board). … It is clear from the enabling statute cited above and from the language and holding in the case of Concerned Residents v.

People v. Nalty

141 Misc. 2d 90 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1988

(People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513 [1987]; People v Caviness, 38 NY2d 227, 231 ; see also, Richardson, Evidence § 201 [Prince 10th ed].) … Senior’s actions and words, between the time of the robbery and the time he identified the defendants, were made impulsively without reason to fabricate and under the stress of excitement (People v Brown, supra; People v

People ex rel. Welling v. Meakin

10 N.Y.S. 161 · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 1890

The learned counsel for the appellant evidently misapprehends the language of Emott, J., in People v. Board, 27 N. Y. 378 , quoted and followed in People v. Booth, 49 Barb. 31 , and People v. Taylor, 1 Abb. Pr. (N. … In People v.

Desantis v. Dukes

182 N.J. Super. 390 · Passaic County Family Court · May 6, 1981

In Lang v. … M. v. F., 95 N.J.Super. 165, 169 (J. & D.R.1967). In M. v.

Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp. v. Frederick County

62 Va. Cir. 52 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · May 8, 2003

Burns v. Mayor of Rockville, 525 A.2d at 261 (citations omitted). To put it more bluntly, “fire fighting is a governmental function.” Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. … See Luckett v. Jennings, 246 Va. 303 , 435 S.E.2d 400 (1993).

People ex rel. Wohl v. Leo

109 Misc. 448 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1919

the decision of the superintendent of buildings was in form an application to that board for a modification of section 6 of the building zone resolution in the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the board by section … The board of appeals had jurisdiction to review the superintendent’s decision under section 719 of the Greater New York charter.

Norris v. Walcott

36 Misc. 3d 711 · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 2012

(See Steglich v Board of Educ. of the City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 32 Misc 3d 1203[A] , 2011 NY Slip Op 51159[U] [2011].) … School Dist. v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 301 AD2d 919 [2003]; *728 Matter of International High School: Charter School at LaGuardia Community Coll, v Mills, 276 AD2d 165 [2000].)

Baron v. Pritzker

52 Pa. D. & C.4th 14 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 6, 2001

The board also may have the shares formally appraised. … Blumer v. Dorfman, 447 Pa. 131, 136 , 289 A.2d 463, 466-67 (1972); Brown v. Hahn, 419 Pa. 42, 47 , 213 A.2d 342, 345 (1965); Peters Township Sanitary Authority v.

Wood v. Town of Whitehall

120 Misc. 124 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1923

In Kinyon v. … Louthan v.

In re Brown

139 Misc. 2d 550 · New York City Family Court · Apr 6, 1988

Saint Dominic’s Home (petitioner herein) has moved to terminate the parental rights of Brenda Brown and Curtis Cumby with respect to twin children born to Ms. Brown on June 29, 1983. … This position is rejected in light of the unequivocal teaching of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Corey L v Martin L ( 45 NY2d 383 ) and Matter of Dickson v Lascaris ( 53 NY2d 204 ), that classic abandonment principles

Mothers' Assistance Fund

4 Pa. D. & C. 280 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Harrisburg County · Dec 19, 1923

Mothers’ Assistance Fund v. … Bell, 145 Pa. 374 ; Keller v. Scranton, 200 Pa. 130 .”

Donegan v. Moran

5 N.Y.S. 575 · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 1889

Brown were engaged in business in the city of Hew York as partners in the year 1880, under the firm name of Moran & Brown. … In Weaver v.

Daniels v. True

47 Ohio Misc. 2d 8 · Hamilton County Municipal Court · Dec 9, 1988

The court in Brown v. … The prerequisites have been met in that Brown, supra, was made part of the public inspection file of the Attorney General’s office under R.C. 1345.05(A)(3) prior to 1979. Mihailoff v. Ionna (May 6, 1987), Hamilton App.

Star Co. v. Wheeler Syndicate, Inc.

160 N.Y.S. 689 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1916

Popularly known as the “Buster Brown” case. While the facts in the “Buster Brown” case are quite analogous in some features to those here appearing, yet they may be differentiated in material respects. … In the “Buster Brown” case the court found as a fact that the New York Herald was the first to use the words “Buster Brown” as the “title of a comic section” of its newspaper.

Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp. v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (In re Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp.)

2018 Ohio 2706 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Pickaway County · Jun 5, 2018

See D.A.B.E., Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas Cty. … Rights Comm. v. Case W. Res. Univ. , 76 Ohio St.3d 168 , 178, 666 N.E.2d 1376 (1996), citing Our Place, Inc. v.

Roosevelt Savings Bank v. Goldberg

118 Misc. 2d 220 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1983

Sav. & Loan Assn. of Rochester v Brown, 86 AD2d 963 .) … Sav. & Loan Assn. of Rochester v Brown, 78 AD2d 119 , app dsmd 53 NY2d 939 .)

Adams v. Carrier Corp.

1 Va. Cir. 150 · Richmond City Circuit Court · Apr 10, 1973

City of Richmond v. Supervisors of Henrico Co., 83 Va. 204, 212 (1887). See also Perry v. Board of Funeral Directors, 203 Va. 161, 165 (1961). … Kesterson v. Hill, 101 Va. 739, 743-744 (1903). Cf. Bain v. Boykin, 180 Va. 259, 264 (1942).

Heintz v. Sawyer

1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 149 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Apr 15, 1903

Pollock on Contracts, 321; Griffiths v. Goldsaw, supra; McClellan v. Bishop, 42 O. S., 113; Thomas v. Richmond, 12 Wallace, 356. Ohio v. Board of Education, 35 O. S., 519, bears similarity to the case at bar. … S., —, and in Barber v. Bank, 50 O. S., 90. C. W. Baker, Miller Outcalt, for receivers. Walter A. DeCamp, Swing & Morse, F. Sanford Brown, Province M. Pogue, A. C. Shaituck, Philip Boettinger, H. L.

Pepper's Will

1 Parsons 436 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 25, 1850

The authorities to this point are-numerous and conclusive; Adams v. Austen, 3 Russell, 461; Horte v. Blackman, 6 Maddock, 190; Lowson v. Lowson, 3 Brown’s Ch. Rep. 272; M’Leroth v. Bacon, 5 Ves. Jr. 159; Moulton v. … Tucker, 2 Merivale, 533; Nancrek v. Horton, 7 Vesey, Jr. 398; Andrews v. Emmet, 2 Brown Ch. Rep. 303; Webb v. Honner, 1 Jacobs & Walker, 352.

People v. Acklin

102 Misc. 2d 596 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1980

Rensing, 14 NY2d 210 ; People v Maynard, 80 Misc 2d 279 ). … "[TJhose incapable of eloquent expression and abstract thought * * * also deserve a fair hearing” (Matter of Brown v Ristich, 36 NY2d 183, 192 , supra).