Case law

Esther W. v. Melvin H.

119 Misc. 2d 690 · New York City Family Court · Jun 17, 1983

(Pickett v Brown,. 638 SW2d 369 .) … The Supreme Court in Pickett v Brown (supra) adopted the analysis of Mills v Habluetzel ( 456 US 91 ).

Zumstein v. Tafel

4 Ohio N.P. 314 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 1, 1896

In the case of Delahanty v. … The case of Moles v. Stevenson. 30 Atl., 647 , was a case of mandamus. The case of tne State ex rel. Gallagher v. Brown, was a case of application for a writ of mandamus. The cuse of State ex rel. Hart v.

Rothman v. Pelcher

89 Misc. 2d 560 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1977

Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Riverhead, 2 NY2d 500, 510 ). … Matter of Queensbury Hotel Corp. v Board of Assessors of City of Glen Falls, 33 Misc 2d 302 ), the distinct character of the condominium ought to be recognized.

New York Times Co. v. City of New York

176 Misc. 2d 872 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1998

(Doe v Greco, 62 AD2d, supra, at 501.) … Co. v Cohen, Stracher & Bloom, 65 NY2d 148 , 151 [1985], quoted in Matter of Drew v Schenectady County, supra, at 246.)

People v. Blue Ribbon Ice Cream Co.

1 Misc. 2d 453 · New York Court of Special Session · Jan 27, 1956

(Agriculture and Markets Law, § 71-a, subd. 4; Browne v. City of New York, 241 N. Y. 96 ; Adler v. Deegan, 251 N. Y. 467 ; Matter of Kress & Co. v. Department of Health of City of N. Y., 283 N. Y. 55 .) … (People v. Del Gardo, 1 Misc 2d 821 ; Good Humor Corp. v. City of New York, 290 N. Y. 312 ; Quaker Oats Co. v. City of New York, supra; People v. Wile, 286 App. Div. 753 , supra, People v. Wile, 208 Misc. 548 .)

Semler v. State

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 581 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1905

He told Brown that the draft had been “arranged for,” and, at his request, Brown gave him five thousand dollars in currency and the note which they held for collection, and with the money Semler absconded, both drafts being … S. 3175q et seq.), declaratory as it is in the main of the common law upon that subject, and especially in view of the discussion of the terms, “cheek” and “draft,” in the case *584 of Oyster & Fish Co. v.

City of Roanoke v. Holt

30 Va. Cir. 306 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · Mar 22, 1993

See City of Richmond v. Confrere Club of Richmond, 239 Va. 77, 79, 387 S.E.2d 471 (1990); John G. Dillon, Commentaries on the Law of Municipal Corporations, 5th ed. (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1911), Vol. … Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County v. Pumphrey, 221 Va. 205, 206-07 , 269 S.E.2d 361 (1980) (citations omitted). See also Granny's Cottage, Inc. v. Town of Occoquan, 3 Va. App. 577 , 352 S.E.2d 10 (1987).

Bloomingdale v. Bloomingdale

107 Misc. 646 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1919

Brown v. Britton, 41 App. Div. 57 . … (Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354 -360; Baker v. Bliss, 39 id. 70.) ” In .other states the enforcibility of charter provisions limiting the transfer of corporate stock is recognized.

Meaney v. Keating

200 Misc. 308 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1951

(Fitzgerald v. Harbor Lighterage Co., 244 N. Y. 132 ; Larscy v. Hogan & Sons, 239 N. Y. 298 .) Since the board had acquired jurisdiction its determination must be deemed fully exclusive between the parties. (Shanahan v. … Y. 469 ; Graf v. Mazzella, 240 App. Div. 974 .) This being so, the award, until the board modifies it, must be treated by all courts as a binding adjudication (Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U. S. 430 ).

Beard v. Root

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 356 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1875

(Bank of Utica v. Ives, 17 Wend., 502 ; Van Etten v. Troudden, 3 N. Y. S. C., 604; Cary v. White, 52 id., 144.) But it is not necessary *358 that the agreement to extend the time of payment be in express terms. … This is precisely the case stated in the opinion of Judge Allen, in Cary v.

Bookheim v. Alexander

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 458 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

v. … In Joy v. Diefendorf (40 N. Y. St.

In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Randy's Super Foods, Inc.

6 Misc. 2d 585 · New York County Courts · Jan 22, 1957

The court said (p. 528): “ The language of section 230 of the Lien Law is entirely different from that of section 65 of the Personal Property Law. .This distinction was clearly pointed out in Baker v. Hull ( 250 N. … This distinction was before the Court of Appeals in its consideration of the Brown Bomber case and it failed to overrule that holding.

Di Benio v. Panaro

34 Misc. 2d 814 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1962

Brown v. Freisch, 215 N. Y. 356 ; Matter of Gabelmann, 136 Misc. 641 ; Matter of Walker, 50 N. Y. S. 2d 277). … Board of Canvassers of Richmond County, 156 N. Y. 36 ). Therefore, the court directs the parties hereto to appear before it at 9:30 a.m. on May 3,1962, at the Orange County Courthouse, Newburgh, N.

In re Will of Brown

85 Va. Cir. 235 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · Aug 21, 2012

See Berry v. Trible, 271 Va. 289, 301-02 , 626 S.E.2d 440, 446-47 (2006); see also Langfitt v. Langfitt, 151 S.E. 715, 717 (W. … See Farmers Bank of Clinch Valley v.

Cole v. Goldberger, Pedersen & Hochron

95 Misc. 2d 720 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1978

Betts v Tom, 431 F Supp 1369, 1377 , supra; but, see, Brown v Liberty Loan Co., supra, p 1369). … Brown v Liberty Loan Co., 539 F2d 1355, 1369, supra).

Olp v. Town of Brighton

173 Misc. 1079 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1940

Doscher v. Sisson, supra.) … (Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 281 N. Y. 534 .)

Elkind v. City of New Rochelle

5 Misc. 2d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1957

(Browne v. City of New York, 241 N. Y. 96 .) ” (See, also, Matter of International Ry. Co. v. Public Service Comm., 242 App. Div. 300 ; Matter of Oystermen’s Dock Co. v. Downing, 258 N. Y. 156, 160 .) … reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The common council may from time to time on its own motion or on petition, after public notice and hearing, which hearing may be held by the council or by a committee of the council or by the planning board

Mont-Bux, Inc. Appeal

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 266 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Feb 11, 1977

As stated in Mid-County Manor, Inc. v. Haverford Township Board of Commissioners, 22 Pa. … In York Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Brown, 407 Pa. 649 , 182 A. 2d 706 (1962), the court sustained the denial of a special exception in a similar situation.

Lasky v. Van Lindt

115 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1982

OPINION OF THE COURT Orest V. Maresca, J. … Since there is no absolute right to a racehorse owner’s license, petitioner has no “claim of entitlement” that would require the board to grant him a hearing (see Perry v Sindermann, 408 US 593, 601 ).

Burnett v. Snyder

11 Jones & S. 238 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 7, 1878