Case law

Fitch v. Baldwin

17 Johns. 161 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1819

Brown and others, v. Ayres, (14 Johns. … We held, that the defendant was estopped, admitting that he entered under Dobkins, and had a deed from his heirs at the time he agreed to purchase from Brown, unless he was in some way deceived or imposed upon in making such

In re Will of Brown

85 Va. Cir. 235 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · Aug 21, 2012

See Berry v. Trible, 271 Va. 289, 301-02 , 626 S.E.2d 440, 446-47 (2006); see also Langfitt v. Langfitt, 151 S.E. 715, 717 (W. … See Farmers Bank of Clinch Valley v.

Burns v. Joyce

33 Misc. 2d 1088 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1962

Union & Advertiser Co. v. Stallknecht ( 189 N. Y. 521 ). In the case of People ex rel. Troy Press Co. v. … Troy Press Co. v.

People ex rel. Flaxman v. Hennessy

74 Misc. 166 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1911

See Sauer v. City of New York, 180 N. Y. 32 . … Hyatt v. Taylor, 42 N.

Second National Bank of Cooperstown v. Calvert

152 Misc. 884 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1934

(Lewis v. Smith, 9 N. Y. 502 ; Merchants’ Bank v. Thomson, *887 55 N. Y. 7 ; Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Goldman, 75 N. Y. 127 ; Goebel v. Iffla, supra; Nelson v. Brown, 144 N. Y. 384 ; Anderson v. … Div. 676 ; Fern v. Osterhout, 11 App. Div. 319 ; Barker v. Burton, 67 Barb. 458 .) ” In Jasper v.

New York State Commission on Government Integrity v. Congel

142 Misc. 2d 9 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1988

of Elections and its investigation into earlier allegations of wrongdoing arising out of the elections to determine whether the Board adequately monitored compliance with the Election Law and, if not, whether the Board’s … v Smith, 59 NY2d 454 [1983]); objects in plain view (e.g., Texas v Brown, 460 US 730 [1983]); searches incident to lawful arrest (Rawlings v Kentucky, 448 US 98 [1980]; People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369 [1983]).

Miller v. West Penn Power Co.

11 Pa. D. & C. 4 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County · Sep 12, 1927

A. 1915-C, 261, 273; Browne v. Turner, 176 Mass. 9 ; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp., 83 S. E. Repr. 946, 248 U. S. 372 ; Portland R. L. & P. Co. v. Portland, 200 Fed. Repr. 890; Bullard v. … See opinion of Chief Justice Brown, Scranton v. Public Service Comm., 268 Pa. 192 , for a discussion of the theory upon which this principle rests.”

Matter of Baird v. Kelly

2004 NY Slip Op 50394(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Mar 29, 2004

The Board remanded the matter to the Medical Board on various occasions (see petitioner's exhibits M, R, V). … The Board is "entitled to 'rely on the Medical Board's recommendations as to causation, an issue reflecting on matters of medical judgment, even in the face of conflicting evidence'" ( In re Bates [Brown] , 182 AD2d 574 [

Fessenden v. Woods

16 Bosw. 550 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 4, 1858

(Porter v. Williams, 5 Seld., 142; Edmonston v. McLoud, 16 N. Y. R., 544.) An assignment also is stated to have been executed. When then the levy was made, no legal right remained in the judgment debtor. … (Herkimer County Bank v. Brown, 6 Hill, 232 ; Knower v. Barnard, 5 Hill, 377 .) In Cosher v. Peterson, cited, (7 Halsted, 291,) Oh. J.

V. J. Hajjar Associates, Inc. v. Medical Service Ass'n

15 Pa. D. & C.3d 251 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jun 30, 1980

Lindquist, 356 Pa. 385 , 52 A. 2d 180 (1947) (stockholders are bound by bylaws); Brown v. Lehman, 141 Pa. … Board of Property Assessments, 459 Pa. 268 , 328 A. 2d 819 (1974); Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Indiana Co. Board of Assessment, 438 Pa. 506 , 266 A. 2d 78 (1970).

Green v. Riggs

3 Balt. C. Rep. 178 · Baltimore City Superior Court · Mar 22, 1912

On motion, the board proceeded with the trial of Joseph E. Green, the witnesses were called into the board room and the trial proceeded. … is to be rendered by the board.

People v. King

116 Misc. 2d 614 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1982

At this point, both Lois Brown and Margaret Brown were together in the police station. Mar *617 garet Brown had been joined by another man. … No such purpose would be served in this case by suppressing the second statement (Matter of Emilio M., 37 NY2d 173 ; People v Coker, 103 Misc 2d 703 ).

Spalla v. Robbins

44 Pa. D. & C.4th 70 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County · Oct 28, 1999

Defendants strongly argue under Rost v. State Board of Psychology, 659 A.2d 626, 629 (Pa. Commw. 1995) the psychotherapist has a responsibility to protect the confidentiality of the records of a patient. … Parenthetically, we note no objections or appeals were filed to Judge Brown’s order.

Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC

2025 NY Slip Op 25064 · Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County · Mar 18, 2025

As a matter of first impression, the court must set a monetary undertaking in the context of a proceeding commenced pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10) where there are no quantifiable losses. ( Cf Brown v 99 Sutton LLC , 2002 NY Slip … In Brown v 99 Sutton LLC (Civ Ct, Kings County 2002), also an "illegal lockout" proceeding in which the petitioner therein prevailed, the court set a $500,000 undertaking pending appeal based on substitute housing costs.

State v. Weinstein

69 Ohio Misc. 2d 33 · Hamilton County Municipal Court · Apr 17, 1995

In Texas v. Brown (1983), 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 , defendant Brown was stopped at a routine driver’s license check point. Brown could not produce a license and was asked to step out of the car. … The state also finds no support in State v. Brown, supra. The case at bar and State v. Brown are on point with the only exception being that in State v.

People ex rel. Napoleon v. Lemmon

5 Sandf. 681 · The Superior Court of New York City · Nov 12, 1852

R. 283; License cases, 5 Ib. 504; Blackbird Creek Marsh Company, 2 Peters, 250 ; New York v. Miln, 11 Peters, 130 ; Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 ; Groves v. Slaughter, 15 Peters, 511 .) … (Commonwealth v. Ayres, 18 Pick. R. 221; Willard v. the People, 4 Scammon’s Rep. 471; Case of Sewall's Slaves, 3 Am. Jurist, 404.)

Goff v. County of Union

26 N.J. Misc. 135 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Jan 8, 1948

Essbee Amusement Corp. v. Greenhaus, 114 N. J. L. 492; 177 Atl. Rep. 562 ; Rojeski v. Pennington Dairy Farms, Inc., 118 N. J. L. 335; 192 Atl. Rep. 746 . … I am not aware of any such authority in law which would authorize a sheriff of a county to engage a prisoner as an employee and thereby bind the Board of Chosen Freeholders and the County of Union.

Rockwood Water Co. v. Wolf

33 Pa. D. & C. 115 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County · May 31, 1938

. *120 419 ; Deal v. Miller, 245 Pa. 1 ; Cella et al. v. Davidson et al., 304 Pa. 389 ; Gallagher v. McAdams, 49 Pa. Superior Ct. 81 ; Kann v. Kann et al., 27 Dist. R. 185. … Clearly, this was illegal, and did not constitute an election of said persons as directors: Forsyth et al. v. Brown et al., 2 Dist. R. 765; Commonwealth ex rel. v. Vandegrift, 232 Pa. 53 ; Commonwealth ex rel. v.

Board of Mgrs. of the Oceana Condominium No. Eight v. Usmanov

2024 NY Slip Op 33536(U) · New York Supreme Court, Kings County · Oct 2, 2024

Board of Mgrs. of the Oceana Condominium No. … Eight v Usmanov 2024 NY Slip Op 33536(U) October 2, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 10720/2013 Judge

Beard v. Root

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 356 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1875

(Bank of Utica v. Ives, 17 Wend., 502 ; Van Etten v. Troudden, 3 N. Y. S. C., 604; Cary v. White, 52 id., 144.) But it is not necessary *358 that the agreement to extend the time of payment be in express terms. … This is precisely the case stated in the opinion of Judge Allen, in Cary v.