Case law

Bradley v. Cool

18 Pa. D. & C. 404 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1932

But plaintiff did not agree to furnish Cool with any goods nor with board and lodging, which might be regarded as necessaries. … A minor “can only appear by a general guardian or one ad litem: Mitchell v. Spaulding, 206 Pa. 220 ; Manning v. Baylinson, 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 512 ; Ohlweiler v. Ohlweiler, 72 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 ; Kay v. Haupt, 63 Pa.

Rieger v. Rieger

90 Va. Cir. 29 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Feb 9, 2015

Brown v. Lukhard, 229 Va. 316, 321 , 330 S.E.2d 84 (1985) (“If language is clear and unambiguous, there is no need for construction by the court; the plain meaning and intent of the enactment will be given it.”). … The Court distinguished this case from Carmon v. Department of Soc. Servs., 21 Va. App. 749 , 467 S.E.2d 815 (1996). In Carmon , free room and board were considered “income” under Va.

Ex parte Scott

15 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 321 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Dec 19, 1913

The case of Trageser v. Gray, 73 Md., 250 , is in many of its aspects analogous to the ease at bar. In that case a board of three commissioners was established with power to grant licenses to sell liquor at retail. … However, this precise proposition has been passed upon, by no less great authority than the Supreme *326 Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Decie v. Brown, 167' Mass., 290.

Grumme v. Vuxton

1 Pa. D. & C.3d 456 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bradford County · Mar 10, 1976

A board of arbitrators, which sat on August 6, 1975, entered an award for plaintiff in the full amount prayed for, plus court costs. … See Brown v. Popky, 413 Pa. 236 , 196 A.2d 638 (1964); and Flynn v. City of Chester, 429 Pa. 170 , 239 A.2d 322 (1968).

American Woodmark Corp. v. City of Winchester

34 Va. Cir. 421 · Winchester County Circuit Court · Sep 21, 1994

See County of Chesterfield v. BBC Brown Boveri, Inc., 238 Va. 64, 69 , 380 S.E.2d 890, 893 (1989). … E.g., Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1113 (3d Cir. 1990); Doe v. Connecticut Department of Child and Youth Services, 911 F.2d 868, 869 (2d Cir. 1990); Pesce v. J.

Gomez v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

10 Misc. 3d 900 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2005

Diamond, M.D., a board-certified neurologist, with regard to the doctor’s recent physical examination of plaintiff. … of causation between the accident and the claimed injury. ( 4 NY3d 566 [2005], citing Franchini v Palmieri, 1 NY3d 536, 537 [2003]; see also, Mohamed v Siffrain, 19 AD3d 561 [2d Dept 2005]; Brown v Achy, 9 AD3d 30 [1st Dept

Graham Aviation Co. v. City of Johnstown

69 Pa. D. & C. 609 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County · Sep 19, 1949

Defendant’s brief quotes the following from the case of Brown v. … This is not such a case as Kaufmann v.

In re of Noneman

36 Ohio Misc. 122 · Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 23, 1973

This court is unable to perceive that either State v. Starnes (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 38 , 254 N. E. 2d 675 , or Hoban v. … Of course, it is noted that this same Attorney General Brown is again Mr. Justice Paul W. Brown of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Hillas v. Fuller

143 N.Y.S. 15 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1913

Marx v. Jones, 36 Hun, 292 ; Morgan *17 v. Smith, 70 N. Y. 537 . … Whittemore v. J. L. & S. O. Co. et al., supra. The receipt to Brown was not under seal, so that its effect, even at common law, is to release him and no one else.

Anderson v. Blood

33 N.Y.S. 233 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1895

Support for this general proposition may be found in Williamson v. Brown, supra; Acer v. Westcott, 46 N. Y. 384 ; Baker v. Bliss, 39 N. Y. 70 ; Reed v. Gannon, 50 N. Y. 345 ; Bennett v. Buchan, 76 N. Y. 386 ; Kirsch v. … It follows that the special term did not err in invoking the rule of Williamson v. Brown.

People ex rel. Case v. Collins

19 Wend. 56 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1837

In Henderson v. Brown, 1 Caines, 92 , the assessment of a direct tax upon a theatre as a dwelling house, though it was not occupied as such, and should therefore have been assessed as land, was imposed by the assessors. … Rex v. Brown , 3 T. R. 574, note. In Rex v. Stacey, 1 T.

IMO Industries, Inc. v. Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C.

192 Misc. 2d 605 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2002

(Jakobleff v Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn, 97 AD2d 834, 835 [2d Dept 1983]; see, Hearn v Rhay, 68 FRD 574 [ED Wash 1975].) … (Brandman v Cross & Brown Co., 125 Misc 2d 185, 188 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1984].)

N. H. Savings Bank v. Downing

16 N.H. 187 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1844

Bank v. Woodward, 5 N. H. 99. … Bailey v. Adams, 10 N. H. 164.

Secor v. Law

9 Bosw. 163 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1862

(Dillaye v., Niles, 4 Abb., 253 ; Ferrerira v. Depew, Id., 131; Davidson v. Remington, 12 How., 310 ; Van de Sande v. Hall, 13 Id., 458; Spencer v. Babcock, 22 Barb., 327 .) … (Brown v. Cuming, 2 Cai., 33 ; Hepburn v. Hoag, 6 Cow., 613 ; Wilmot v. Hurd, 31 Wend., 584 .) Bat there is sufficient in the record in this case to defeat such claim on the merits.

Crestani v. Walters

7 Pa. D. & C.5th 15 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · Jan 23, 2009

Brown Jr. entered an order on July 3, 2003, confirming the original metes and bounds of the easements, and *17 confirming plaintiff’s right to maintain the cartway. … Miller v. Commonwealth Board of Property, 111 Pa. Commw. 240, 243 , 533 A.2d 819, 820 (1987). In the prior action, defendants sought a declaratory judgment “restricting [Mr.

Nardone v. Ryan

49 Misc. 2d 93 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1966

of trustees in villages having three members on the board of trustees and three-fourths of the members of the board of trustees in all the other villages.” … Glen Cove Shopping Center v. Suozzi, 8 Misc 2d 247 ; Matter of Melita v. Nolan, 126 Misc. 345 ).

In re Christine M.

157 Misc. 2d 4 · New York City Family Court · Dec 21, 1992

(See, Matter of Viemeister, 179 NY 235, 241 [1904], supra; McCartney v Austin, 31 AD2d 370 [3d Dept 1969]; In re Whitmore, 47 NYS2d 143 [Domestic Relations Ct 1944]; Pierce v Board of Educ., 30 Misc 2d 1039 [Sup Ct, Oswego … In Mason v General Brown Cent. School Dist. (851 F2d 47 [2d Cir 1988]) the court rejected parents’ claim of a sincerely held religious based objection under former section 2164 (9).

In re New York & Harlem Railroad

11 Abb. Pr. 90 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1871

Co. v. Brown, 9 H. of L. Cas., 246). The only way to avoid the decision of the corporation, is to show by affirmative proof the want of good faith and the presence of fraud in the proceeding. III. … Kip the legal relation of purchaser and vendor, *96 and the obligation of the lease is not affected (Doo v. London & Croydon Railw. Co., 1 Railw. Cas., 257; Stone v. Commercial Railw. Co., 4 Mylne & C., 122; Mason v.

Saxtoh v. Hitchcock

47 Barb. 220 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1866

(Brown v. Dewey, 2 Barb. 28 . Robinson v. Cropsey, 6 Paige, 280 . Holmes v. Grant, 8 id. 257. Brown v. Dean, 3 Wend. 208 .) … (See Brown v. Dewey, 2 Barb. 28 ; Baker v. Thrasher, 4 Denio, 493 ; White v. Schuyler, MS. G. T. 3d dist.)

Onthank v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad

15 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1876

The railroad company constructed on Brown’s land a reservoir in which to collect the water of said springs and excavated a trench on the lands of said Brown and the plaintiff, laid pipes therein and conducted the water to … In Jones v.