Case law

Nappi v. La Guardia

184 Misc. 775 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1944

hearing before the Board of Estimate. … Bank v. Zoning Appeals Board, 281 N. Y. 534 , supra; McCabe v. City of New York, 281 N. Y. 349, 353 ; Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New York, 267 App.

McKenna v. State

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 185 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 4, 1980

In April of 1976, Claimant was contacted by the State Board of Education relative to the possibility of his serving as a hearing officer in certain matters. … stated, in part, as follows: “The order of this Court is that, since there were no findings of fact by the hearing officer, and since the time is long expired for this applying of such findings of fact, the order of Joseph V.

Maley Estate

60 Pa. D. & C.2d 86 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Oct 4, 1971

Petitioner-beneficiary cites Kraynok v. … Our Supreme Court in Melcher v. Pa. T. & F. Mut. Cas. Ins.

Donnelly v. O'Rourke

20 Misc. 2d 159 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1959

In equity it is sufficient if the defendant has title to the property at the time of trial (Brown v. … (Lightfoot v. Davis, 198 N. Y. 261, 273 ; Bloomquist v. Farson, 222 N. Y. 375, 380 ; Kilbourne v. Board of Supervisors, 137 N. Y. 170, 178 ; Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Village of Garden City, 270 App. Div. 936 ; Hoffman v.

People v. Saez

125 Misc. 2d 125 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1984

(People v Wright, 56 NY2d 613 ; People v Minaya, 54 NY2d 360 , cert den 455 US 1024 ; People v Blount, 54 AD2d 718 ; People v Crawford, 64 AD2d 612 ; People v Anderson, 60 AD2d 632 ; People v Brown, 54 AD2d 719 .) … It would seem that People v Brown (supra) can be distinguished from the present case, yet one County Court has held otherwise. (People v Sapp, 105 Misc 2d 312 .)

Walsh v. Sexton

55 Barb. 251 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1869

I concur in the views expressed by the court in Brown v. Brown, (18 Conn. R. 410,) against both the principle and the policy of sustaining such a gift. But the authorities are the other way. … The case lately decided in the Court of Appeals, of Westerlo v. De Witt, ( 36 N. Y. Rep. 340 ,) sustains the doctrine contended for by the appellant.

Davis v. Fidelity National Insurance

32 Pa. D. & C.5th 179 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Aug 15, 2013

Brown v. Progressive Insurance Co., 2004 WL 2002477 , *7, ¶34 (Pa. Super. 2004); O’Donnell v. Allstate Insurance Co., 734 A.2d 901, 905 (Pa. … Brown, supra at *6, ¶31 (quoting Romano v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 435 Pa.

Even/Anna Promotions v. State

50 Ill. Ct. Cl. 380 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 10, 1998

This claim comes before the Court on Claimant Even/ Anna Promotions’ complaint against Respondent, The State of Illinois, Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities for Chicago State University.

Rubin v. McAlevey

54 Misc. 2d 338 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1967

The Town Board forwarded the same to the Planning Board. … Corp. v.

Ferris v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 of Towns of Roxbury

195 Misc. 871 · New York County Courts · Aug 17, 1949

We are not unmindful of the decision in Matter of Hector v. … And in Staszewski v. City of Rochester ( 271 App.

New York State Hairdressers & Cosmetologists Ass'n v. Cuomo

83 Misc. 2d 154 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1975

(McDonald v Board of Elections, 394 US 802 ; Railway Express v New York, 336 US 106 ; Royster Guano Co. v Virginia, 253 US 412 .) … (People v Bunis, 9 NY2d 1 ; Loblaw, Inc. v New York State Bd. of Pharmacy, 11 NY2d 102 ; People v Gillson, 109 NY 389 ; Burke v Kingsley Books, 208 Misc 150 , affd sub nom Brown v Kingsley Books, 1 NY2d 177 ; Defiance Milk

Shostack v. Haskell

116 Misc. 475 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1921

Levy v. Kon, 114 *477 App. Div. 795 ; Cohen v. Ratkowsky, 43 id. 196, 198; Lipschutz v. Horton, 55 Misc. Rep. 44 ; Steinmetz v. Kindred, 121 App. Div. 260 ; Brown v. Mando, 125 id. 380 . … Div. 528 ) and Brown v. Mando (125 id. 380).” The Brown case referred to seems clearly to hold that the matter is one in the court’s discretion, and so by coupling Cohen v.

Staminski v. Romeo

62 Misc. 2d 1051 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1970

See, also, Harper v. City of Kingston, supra.) … Pruzan v.

In re

2017 Ohio 7408 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County · Aug 31, 2017

State v. Brown , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96615, 2011-Ohio-5676 , 2011 WL 5299304 , ¶ 17. A court abuses its discretion when it acts unreasonably, arbitrarily, or unconscionably. Id. , citing State ex rel. Edwards v. … Brown at ¶ 22.

Board of Directors for Kings Oak Terrace Coop. Apts. Inc. v. Bersh

2024 NY Slip Op 51039(U) · Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County · Aug 12, 2024

Board of Directors for Kings Oak Terrace Coop. Apts. Inc. v Bersh ( 2024 NY Slip Op 51039(U) ) [*1] Board of Directors for Kings Oak Terrace Coop. Apts. … Estate of Brown , 160 Misc 2d 107 (App Term, 2d Dept 1994) for its contention that an estate is a proper, but not necessary, party to a holdover proceeding.

Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. Condominium v. Ansary

2024 NY Slip Op 30027 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jan 5, 2024

Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. … (Bubul v. Port Parties, 83 AD3d 517 [1st Dep't 2011]).

Berson v. Blue Ridge Coal Corp.

197 Misc. 475 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1950

The rule has been applied to gifts of stocks, bonds and other choses in action (Brown on Personal Property, §§ 38, 46, 60), as is the well-established rule in this State (Matson v. Abbey, 70 Hun 475, 477 , affd. 141 N. … (Matter of Cohn, supra, p. 395; Hawkins v. Union Trust Co., 187 App.

People ex rel. White v. Hulbert

59 Barb. 446 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1871

Co. v. Reynolds, 6 How. Pr. 98. Brown v. Sichman, 9 John. 75, 76 . Terry v. Fargo, 10 id. 114 . Id. 167 .) Things to be proved must be established by competent and satisfactory legal evidence. (1 Greenl. Ev., § 1.) … Co. v.

Heaney v. Heaney

93 Misc. 2d 811 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1978

In addition to tuition, defendant was to assume payment of related fees such as books, room, board, laboratory fees, transportation to and from school plus a reasonable allowance. … Mark informed his father that he was interested in attending Harvard, defendant’s alma mater, Cornell, Brown or M.I.T..

Prillman v. State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 362 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 20, 1973