Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Dominick v. Sayre

    3 Sandf. 555 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 20, 1850

    This leading case, Brown v. … Glynn, Brown v. Higgs ; and Witts v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gusdore Corp. v. Michaels

    13 Misc. 2d 762 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1958

    (Town Law, § 195; Matter of Beckmann v. Talbot, 278 N. Y. 146, 150 ; Lewis v. City of Lockport, 276 N. Y. 336, 343 ; New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. v. City of Yonkers, 238 N. Y. 165 , 178; Matter of Doey v. … (General Municipal Law, § 51; Smith v. Hedges, 223 N. Y. 176 ; Talcott v. City of Buffalo, 125 N. Y. 280 ; Bogart v. County of Westchester, 270 App. Div. 274, 278 ; McCormick v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Woodruff

    50 Misc. 2d 430 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1966

    The determination of remedy depends on whether the witness is being punished for her conduct before the Grand Jury (see, e.g., People v. Brayer, 6 A D 2d 437, 438; Matter of Alberti v. … Brown, 366 U. S. 599, 603 . The conduct or actions so regulated have invariably posed some substantial threat to public safety, peace or order.” So too in Board of Educ. v. Barnette ( 319 U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Tweed

    13 Abb. Pr. 419 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1872

    In Brown v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Gillis

    17 N.H. 9 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1845

    Stevenson; 8 Taunt. 325, Hill v. Dobie; 7 Taunt. 206, Thomas v. Pemberton; Holt, N. P. 290, Hastings v. Wilson; Byan & M. 207, Clark v. Hume. … Phelps v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Pacific Steel Boiler Corp.

    132 Misc. 735 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1928

    Brown, its attorney, moves to set aside the alleged service upon it of the summons and complaint. … (Tauza v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC

    2025 NY Slip Op 25064 · Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County · Mar 18, 2025

    As a matter of first impression, the court must set a monetary undertaking in the context of a proceeding commenced pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10) where there are no quantifiable losses. ( Cf Brown v 99 Sutton LLC , 2002 NY Slip … In Brown v 99 Sutton LLC (Civ Ct, Kings County 2002), also an "illegal lockout" proceeding in which the petitioner therein prevailed, the court set a $500,000 undertaking pending appeal based on substitute housing costs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Geary v. Phillips

    53 Misc. 2d 337 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1967

    The defendants are the Mayor and Trustees constituting the Board of Trustees of the village. … We find nothing in the Municipal Home Rule Law which would limit the authority of the defendant village Board of Trustees to adopt the local law in question.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Farrell

    137 Misc. 2d 926 · Dobbs Ferry Justice Court · Dec 8, 1987

    (See, CPLR 4540, 4518 [a], [c]; People v Gower, 42 NY2d 117 [1977]; People v Brown, 128 Misc 2d 149 [Madison County 1985].) … Voluntarily produced records are admissible under CPLR 4518 (c) (see, People v Brown, 128 Misc 2d 149 ; Joyce v Kowalcewski, 80 AD2d 27 [4th Dept 19811).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Patrick

    16 N.Y.S. 578 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

    Justice v. Lang, 42 N. Y. 493 ; McCrea v. Purmort, 16 Wend. 465 . … Railroad Co. v. Dane, 43 N. Y. 240 ; Pol. Cont. 26; Mclver v. Richardson, 1 Maule & S. 557; Mozley v. Tinkler, 1 Cromp. M. & R. 692; Russell v. Thornton, 4 Hurl. & N. 788.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Christina Holding Corp. v. Silva

    160 Misc. 2d 462 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1994

    commencing a special proceeding but "[s]uch petition must be presented to a justice of the supreme court or at a special term of the supreme court within thirty days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tumminello v. Hamlet Development Co.

    174 Misc. 2d 239 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1997

    He contends that it was this Board who contracted with plaintiff’s employer to perform the work, and therefore the individuals can be held liable. … (Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 211 AD2d 441 [1st Dept 1995], affd 87 NY2d 938 [1996]; DeNota v 45 E. 85th St. Corp., 163 Misc 2d 734 [1995].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Perez

    13 Pa. D. & C.4th 258 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Nov 6, 1991

    Commonwealth v. Danforth, supra. New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 83 L.Ed.2d 720 , 105 S.Ct. 733, 738 , 53 U.S.L.W. 4083 (1985), citing Almeida-Sanchez v. … He boarded the flight to Florida, arrived *262 and checked into a room registered to “Susan Gates.” Early the next morning, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ogden v. Pope

    18 N.Y.S. 140 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Mar 7, 1892

    Nickerson v. Ruger, 76 N. Y. 279 . The defendant was not bound to prove notice to the plaintiff of the facts connected with the execution of the note. … See cases cited in Van Duzer v. Howe, 21 N. Y. 537 . The ■ease cited by respondent, (Forman v. Wright, 11 C. B. 481,) was that of a note procured by misrepresentations to the maker as to the amount actually due.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stuart v. Blatchley

    84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 425 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

    (Hagerty v. Andrews, 94 N. Y. 198 ; Shannon v. Pickell, 2 N. Y. St. Repr. 160.) … It may be that tbe respondent might have moved to have the demurrer stricken out as irregular (Doughty v. Devlin, 1 E. D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillip v. Phillip

    96 Misc. 471 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1916

    Brown to appear on the witness stand and give her version of her relations with this old man and the good faith of the transactions with him. These facts amply support the decree asked for in this action. Edson v. … Real Prop. 672; Stelz v. Schreck, 128 N. Y. 263, 266, 267 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Lockhardt

    62 Misc. 2d 815 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1970

    Land & Buildings ”), it does not confer upon the Planning Board the power to issue building permits. … Said determination is, therefore, not reviewable under article 78 (see Matter of Thurman v. Snowden, 28 A D 2d 705; cf. Matter of Milton Point Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re July 31, 2013, Decision of Board of Zoning Appeals

    88 Va. Cir. 235 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 7, 2014

    (quoting Board of Supervisors v. … See County Board of Arlington County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hauptmann v. Hanley

    153 Misc. 61 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1934

    Fong v. Honeck, 253 N. Y. 536 , which, although reversing the conclusion of fact and decision in 227 App. Div. 436 , sustains that rule enunciated therein and also stated in People ex rel. Gottschalk v. Brown, 237 N. … In Hyatt v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Benatouil v. Calhoun School

    39 Misc. 3d 258 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2012

    (Board of Educ. of Belmont Cent. School Dist. v Gootnick, 65 AD2d 940 [4th Dept 1978].) … v Board of Education, 347 US 483, 493 [1954].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.