Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.66s
31 N.Y.S. 535 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1894
Brown of the numerous little mortgages which I held, and it was done in this way in order that the colonel might not be bothered with the collection of small amounts of interest, but might look to me for such payments in
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Cai. Cas. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1803
be gathered from the two principal cases, relied on, that of Sir Moyle Finch, and of Sir George Reynel, as well as from the decision of the court for the correction of errors, in the case of The Devisees of Van Schaick v.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 N.Y. 75 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1833
This was the doctrine distinctly held by this court in Jaques and others v. Marquand, 6 Cowen, 497, a case very analogous to this, so far as the application of this principle is concerned.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1799
Cited 0 timesPublished3 How. Pr. 305 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1848
(Downer v. Thompson, 6 Hill’s R. 377 ; John L. Carrier v. Henry A. Dellay, 3d vol. Howard’s Pr. Reps., 173.) … Brosnon & Crocker; and a similar rule in a case of Jackson et al. v. Saunders et al.
Cited 0 timesPublished90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1895
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Barb. 24 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1853
(See Cornell v. Moulton, 8 Denio, 12 .) In the last mentioned case it was held that the return of the justice was not evidence of the time when the summons was delivered to the constable. ( Wolfe v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna