Case law

Littlefield v. Brown

1 Wend. 398 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1828

This was so decided in Rawson v. Dole, ( 2 John. Rep. 454 ,) and in Thomas v. Weed, (14 Johns. … In Thompson v. Lockwood, (15 Johns. R. 258,) Spencer, justice, says, that 86 the case of Lansing v.

Brown v. Dean

3 Wend. 208 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1829

Upon the first issue they find (to negative the plea) that William Dean was seised, as averred in his avowries, and leased the premises to Dyer, who held the same as tenant to Dean; and that the plaintiff Brown held as the … In the case of Sullivan v. Stradling, (2 Wils. 208 to 218,) the subject was much discused, and the conclusion of the court was that such a plea is bad.

Brown v. Taber

5 Wend. 566 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1830

Kimball v. Brown

7 Wend. 322 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1831

In Ramchander v. Hammond, 2 Johns. … Tucker v. Ives, 6 Cowen, 195. The case of Tucker v.

Mahan v. Brown

13 Wend. 261 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1835

And in the case of Bury v. Pope, Cro. … So in Morley v. Pragnell, Cro.

Parsons v. Brown

15 Barb. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1853

(Dunlap v. Patterson, 5 Cowen, 243. Douglass v. McAlister, 3 Cranch, 298 . Smith v. Carrington, 4 Id. 62. Vasse v. Smith, 6 Id. 226. Burtch v. Nickerson, 17 John. 217 . Ward v. Lee, 13 Wend. 41 . Gardner v. … Ford v. Monroe, 20 Id. 210. Simpson v. Downing, 23 Id. 316. Stafford v. Bacon, 1 Hill, 532 . Underhill v. Pomeroy, 2 Id. 603 .)

Brown v. Hoburger

52 Barb. 15 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1868

In Dunlap v. Snyder, ( 17 Barb. 561 ,) it was held unanimously by the four judges that such evidence was incompetent, overruling the decision in Brill v. Flagler, ( 23 Wend. 354 .) … In Brill v. Flagler , thus overruled, the court held that the opinion of a witness as to the value of a dog was larely competent. That was the ease of a “ well broke setter dog.”

Brown v. Brown

38 Pa. D. & C.3d 492 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · May 9, 1980

See Weiser v. Weiser, 238 Pa. Super. 490 , 362 A.2d 287 (1976); Com. ex rel. Kaplan v. Kaplan, 219 Pa. Super. 163 , 280 A.2d 456 (1973); Com. ex rel. Goichman v. Goichman, 226 Pa. … Gavrish v. Gavrish, 27 Chester 42 (1979).

Brown v. Cowell

12 Johns. 384 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1815

Brown v. Brown

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 371 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County · Feb 11, 1981

. & C. 256 (1947); McClenen v. McClenen, 36 D. & C. 270 (1939); Keeley v. Keeley, 9 D. & C. 406 (1926); see also 27A C.J.S., Divorce §216 et seq. … See Birl v. Birl, 24 D. & C. 2d 421 (1961). .

Brown v. Genung

1 Wend. 115 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1828

In Livingston v. Rogers, ( 1 Caines, 583 ,) it was held that the want of an award of venire upon the record, was ground for arresting the judgment. In The People v. McKay, (18 Johns. … (Thomas v. Weed, 14 Johns. R. 255. Van Slyck v. Hogeboom, 6 Johns. R. 270.) The action of debt against the sheriff for an escape, is given by the 19th section of the act concerning sheriffs, &c. (1 R. L. *118 425.

Tappan v. Brown

9 Wend. 175 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

The true ground of this recovery, I consider, as given by Heath, J. in Farmer v. Russell, 1 Bos. & Pul. 296, that whether the consideration be good or bad, a man may recover his own money.” … the plaintiff to his agent, which was the same in judgment of law as if it had been paid directly to him; the illegal contract was out of the question, and the rule pari delicto did not apply, though Hooke, J. in Farmer v.

Boyce v. Brown

7 Barb. 80 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1849

(Bullard v. Harrison, 4 M. & Sel. 392. Reynolds v. Edwards, Willes, 287. Holmes v. Goring, 2 Bing. 75. Holmes v. Seely, 19 Wend. 507 .) In Chichester v. … The defendant further says that when he purchased of Jonathan Brown, this road then existed, and when the defendant built his dwelling house, Brown agreed that in consideration that the defendant would build there, he might

Brown v. Brown

40 Pa. D. & C.2d 573 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Nov 9, 1966

We quote from Cole v. … Brown, when was the last time that you saw your husband? “A. The last time was in ’57. “Q. Do you recall what month it was in 1957? “A. I believe in March. “Q. March of 1957? “A. Yes. “Q.

Brown v. Smith

24 Barb. 419 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1857

The case of Van Rensselaer v. … (See also Van Rensselaer v. Wit-beck, 7 Barb. 133 .)

Dan v. Brown

4 Cow. 483 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1825

In the case of Hands v. … Any declarations of Brown, independent of that, are not evidence.

People v. Brown

23 Wend. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1840

Ellis v. Brown

6 Barb. 282 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1849

The indorsement of Brown was inoperative, as such, until Newell, Daniels &• Co. had indorsed their names upon it. In the language of Chief Justice Spencer, in Herrick v. … (Manrow v. Durham, 3 Hill, 584 . Luqueer v. Prosser, 1 Id. 256 ; S.. C. in error, 4 Id. 420. Miller v. Gaston, 2 Id. 188. Hunt v. Brown, 5 Id. 145. Hough v. Gray, 19 Wend. 202. Ketchell v. Burns, 24 Id. 456. 26 Id. 430.

Olmsted v. Brown

12 Barb. 657 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1852

J. in the case of Butler v. Kent, ( 19 John. 228 ,) by Cowen, J. in the case of Hastings v. Palmer, ( 20 Wend. 225 ,) and by Beardsley, J. in the case of Keenholts v. … The case of Stevens v.

Hicks v. Brown

12 Johns. 142 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1815

essential transactions lipón which the defendant became bound to pay the .bill, took place in NemOrleans ; and as it respects him, the contract was wholly made there, which brings it .within the principle of the case of Smith v.