Case law

Commonwealth v. Packer

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 784 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County · Jan 21, 1980

In Com. v. … In citing Com. v.

Gray v. Hafer

2 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 341 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 15, 1904

Brown? If so, did the relation exist at the time *345 plaintiffs parted with their stock? … In Waldrop v. Leaman (which was a case involving dealings between trustee and cestui qui trust), 30 S.

Anderson v. Lockhardt

62 Misc. 2d 815 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1970

Land & Buildings ”), it does not confer upon the Planning Board the power to issue building permits. … Said determination is, therefore, not reviewable under article 78 (see Matter of Thurman v. Snowden, 28 A D 2d 705; cf. Matter of Milton Point Assn. v.

Shultz v. Chatfield

17 Misc. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Brown as the president of the corporation. … The case of Novelty Manufacturing Co. v. Connell, 88 Hun, 254 , cited by defendants, not only is not in conflict with the foregoing views, but seems rather to sustain them.

Cable v. Cooper

15 Johns. 152 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1818

Brown must, therefore, be considered as being in execution by legal process. … The sheriff, on this execution, would have had a right to retake Brown, if he had departed from his custody without his permission, or a new execution might hayc issued against him. On this point the case of Jackson v.

Ganoe v. Trident Corp.

72 Pa. D. & C.2d 750 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 10, 1975

In short, a discontinuance will not be permitted to stand if it would be prejudicial in any way to the rights of others: Bily v. … Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 353 Pa. 49 , 44 A. 2d 250 (1945); Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co., 365 Pa. 155 , 74 A. 2d 105 (1950); Leibowitz v.

Schwab v. Oatman

56 Misc. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1907

See also Williams v. Merle, 11 Wend. 80 ; Barnard v. Campbell, 55 N. Y. 456 ; Collins v. Ralli, 20 Hun, 246 ; Smith v. Clews, 114 id. 190 ; Follett Wool Co. v. Utica Trust & Dep. Co., 84 App. Div. 151 . … See also Smith v. Clews, supra; Follett Wool Co. v. Utica Trust & Dep. Co., supra; Collins v. Ralli, supra.

Smerda v. Smerda

48 Ohio Law. Abs. 232 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · May 1, 1947

Van Fossen v State, 37 Oh St 317; Cox v Cox, 19 Oh St 502; Larick v Walters, 39 Oh Ap 363; Smith v Smith, 72 Oh Ap 203, 163 A. L. R., 370. … In Martin v Martin, 136 N.

Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Kelley

184 Misc. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1944

Act, § 473; Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 ; Bank of Yorktown v. Boland, 280 N. Y. 673 .) … (Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line, 272 U. S. 605, 613 ; Oreg.-Washington Co. v. Washington, 270 U. S. 87 .)

Beaver Universal Corp. v. 1111 Jamaica Ave. Queens Leasing Corp.

163 Misc. 2d 1039 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1995

(See, McCormack v Gomez, 137 AD2d 504 ; Sutro Co. v Valenzuela, 113 AD2d 793 .) … (See, County Law § 527; Fallarino v Board of Educ., 160 Misc 2d 682 .) Ultimately, all affidavits submitted to the court on motions are filed in the County Clerk’s office.

Jennings v. Chenango Mutual Insurance

2 Denio 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1846

In Schuyler v. … In Atherton v. Brown,( 14 Mass.

Dominick v. Sayre

3 Sandf. 555 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 20, 1850

This leading case, Brown v. … Glynn, Brown v. Higgs ; and Witts v.

State ex rel. Raydel v. Raible

64 Ohio Law. Abs. 438 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Feb 3, 1953

The last decision of lower courts on the subject is by the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County in Davis v. Brown, 60 Abs 183 , decided April 1, 1951. … The cost of board, lodging and tuition at University School is well known to be $1500 for a period of 9 months which is for 7 days per week board and lodging, and less if the student only stays 5 school days per week.

Vail v. Broadway R. Co.

6 Misc. 20 · New York City Court · Nov 15, 1893

At and just beyond the point where plaintiff boarded defendant’s car, there is a net work of. rails and crossings and switches extending some considerable distance. … There was testimony on the part of the plaintiff that the setting of the switch in question was done by a small boy (the. witness Brown), who testified that he got off the car and pushed the tongue of the switch to one side

Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC

2025 NY Slip Op 25064 · Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County · Mar 18, 2025

As a matter of first impression, the court must set a monetary undertaking in the context of a proceeding commenced pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10) where there are no quantifiable losses. ( Cf Brown v 99 Sutton LLC , 2002 NY Slip … In Brown v 99 Sutton LLC (Civ Ct, Kings County 2002), also an "illegal lockout" proceeding in which the petitioner therein prevailed, the court set a $500,000 undertaking pending appeal based on substitute housing costs.

Crosby v. 20 Fifth Avenue Hotel Co.

173 Misc. 595 · City of New York Municipal Court · Mar 3, 1939

S.] 141); Van Roy Interstate Co. v. Tucker ( 125 Miss. 260 ; 87 So. 643 ); Brown v. Hines ( 213 Mo. App. 298 ; 249 S. W. 683 ); Union News Co. v. Vinson ([Tex. Civ. App.] 227 S. W. 236 ); Dodge v. Nashville, C. & St. L. … Burden on bailee to show that terms of the special contract were brought to attention of bailor: Brown v. Eastern; R. R. Co. (11 Cush. [Mass.] 97); American Laundry Co. v. Hall ( 27 Ga. App. 717 ; 109 S.

Curtin Matheson Scientific Inc. v. State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 479 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 9, 1975

George v. Fiore

62 Misc. 2d 429 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1970

Petitioners, Daisy George, Gertrude Wallace, Rachel Gibson, Lena Thornton, Willa Mae Maynard and Evelyn Brown (herein called “ petitioners; ” the other named petitioners, Mozelle Jacobs, Edward Ware, Clara Anderson and Jean … (See Matter of Crispell v. Rust, 149 Misc. 464, 467; Howard v. Clark, 59 Misc 2d 327, 328 .)

Barrett v. Cuskelly

52 Misc. 2d 250 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1966

The latter section specifically empowers the board to submit a proposition, such as involved here, to the voters at a special election, but contains no requirement that the board’s adoption of such resolution receive the … Guernsey v. Somers, 153 App. Div. 623 affd. 208 N. Y. 621 ).

Rivera v. Smith

118 Misc. 2d 921 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1983

In Matter of Brown v McGinnis ( 10 NY2d 531 ), the Court of Appeals held that these religious rights are subject to “reasonable curtailment * * * if such is necessary for the ‘proper discipline and management of the institution … Some sexual distinctions in job assignments may be made where sex is related to a bona fide purpose (see Dothard v Rawlinson, 433 US 321 ).