Case law

Gray v. Hafer

2 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 341 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 15, 1904

Brown? If so, did the relation exist at the time *345 plaintiffs parted with their stock? … In Waldrop v. Leaman (which was a case involving dealings between trustee and cestui qui trust), 30 S.

T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Frey

83 Va. Cir. 68 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 31, 2011

RR. v. Board of Supervisors, 109 Va. 34, 37 , 63 S.E. 412 (1909) (citing Richmond Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Brown, 97 Va. 26 , 32 S.E. 775 (1899)). 1. … See Board of Supervisors v. Medical Group Found., Inc., 204 Va. 807 , 134 S.E.2d 258 (1964).

Lennon v. Philip Morris Companies

189 Misc. 2d 577 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2001

(Quoting Brooke Group v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 US 209, 213 [1993].) Plaintiffs contend that lockstep pricing practices continued. … Where a statute instructs that it is “to take effect immediately,” then it is interpreted not to have a retroactive operation or effect (Murphy v Board of Educ., 104 AD2d 796 [2d Dept 1984], referring *586 to McKinney’s Cons

Bush v. McKenzie

21 N.Y.S. 279 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1892

In People v. Board Sup’rs, etc., (N. Y. App.) 32 N. E. Rep. 242, Earl, C. … Election boards and boards of canvassers shall be continued in existence for the purposes of such proceedings. ”' Section 35 of the same act provides: “No voter shall place any mark upon his ballot, or do any other act in

Covert v. Westchester County

2024 NY Slip Op 50617(U) · New York Supreme Court, Westchester County · May 23, 2024

The complaint is based upon an incident that occurred on July 14, 2022 where plaintiff was attempting to board the bus and the bus came into contact with him. … Following the incident, plaintiff spoke to Michael Brown (Brown), a customer service representative for the Bee Line Bus, and advised Brown about the facts of the accident and how Goodwin's defamatory statements made him

Weingarten v. Board of Educ. of the City School Dist. of the City of New York

2004 NY Slip Op 24001 · New York Supreme Court, Bronx County · Jan 12, 2004

Weingarten v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. ( 2004 NY Slip Op 24001 ) Weingarten v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. 2004 NY Slip Op 24001 [ 3 Misc 3d 418 ] January 12, 2004 Supreme … Indeed, two of those cases predate the present statute, i.e., Schoen v Board of Educ. and De Riso v Kennedy ( supra ).

People ex rel. Felder v. Warden of Queens House of Detention for Men

173 Misc. 2d 1029 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1997

Harris v Sullivan ( 74 NY2d 305 ) which limited the waiver of the hearing on out-of-state felony convictions to those instances where an indeterminate term was imposed. … Brown v New York State Bd. of Parole, 133 AD2d 792 ). Petitioner’s application to be restored to parole is denied. This matter first appeared on the court’s calendar under SP No. 146/97.

People ex rel. Hauptmann v. Hanley

153 Misc. 61 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1934

Fong v. Honeck, 253 N. Y. 536 , which, although reversing the conclusion of fact and decision in 227 App. Div. 436 , sustains that rule enunciated therein and also stated in People ex rel. Gottschalk v. Brown, 237 N. … In Hyatt v.

Grafton v. Brigham

24 N.Y.S. 54 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1893

It was distinctly held in Brown v. Mayor, etc., 66 N. … Even as to the amount due, Brown v. Mayor, etc., would seem to be in point. It was held, however, in Jarvis v. Driggs, 69 N. Y. 147 , that this particular question was not decided in Brown v.

Kraushaar v. Zion

188 Misc. 851 · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 1946

In Miller v. Schoene ( 276 U. S. 272, 279-280 ) Mr. … Knoblauch v. Warden, supra).

Putnam v. Maine Board of Licensure For Foresters

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 28, 2006

Centamore v. Dep't of Human Services, 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995). … Seider v. Board of Exam'r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 ¶ 9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, 9 6, 703 A.2d 1258,1261 (Me. 1997)).

Hernandez-Wells v. Wilson

85 Va. Cir. 41 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · Jan 19, 2012

She also cites Rivera v. … See Gas Mart Corp. v. Board of Supervisors, 269 Va. 334 , 611 S.E.2d 340 (2005). In this case, § 8.01-249(5) is the more specific statute and it would control. Additionally, Ms.

Mundy's Executors v. Mundy

15 Ohio C.C. 155 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1897

The American Board of Foreign Missions v. Nelson, 72 Ill., 564 ; Duryea v. Duryea, 85 Ill., 50 . In the case of Swan v. … This ease would seem to be directly opposed to Brown v. Scherrer, supra.

Johnson v. Pacific Steel Boiler Corp.

132 Misc. 735 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1928

Brown, its attorney, moves to set aside the alleged service upon it of the summons and complaint. … (Tauza v.

Lynch v. State

9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 290 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 10, 1936

In the case of Board of Education vs. Ind. … In the case of Board of Education vs. Ind.

P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Fox

18 Misc. 2d 850 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1959

{Dellwood Dairy Co. v. Brown, 106 N. Y. S. 2d 749.) … (Agriculture and Markets Law, §§ 254, 257, 258-c, 258-j; Dellwood Dairy Co. v. Brown, 106 N. Y. S. 2d 749, supra; Washburn’s Dairy v. Mansfield, 200 Misc. 1017 , supra; Matter of Abrams v.

Marvin v. Muller

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 163 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881

(Besel v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 70 N. Y., 173 ; Malone v. Hathway, 64 id., 5; Wright v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 25 id., 562; Laning v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 49 id., 532, 533; Flike v. B. and A. R. R. … Co., 53 id., 549, 553; Coughtry v. G. W.Co., 56 id., 124; De Graff v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co,, 76 id., 125.) Now it must be noted that there was no defect in the derrick.

Pulley v. Maine State Board of Chiropractic Licensure

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 12, 2005

PULLEY, D.C., Petitioner v. … Seider v. Bd. Of Examiners of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, {| 8, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (citing Davric Maine Corp. v. Maine Harness Racing Commission, 1999 ME 99, 7, 732 A.2d 289, 293).

Commonwealth v. Packer

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 784 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County · Jan 21, 1980

In Com. v. … In citing Com. v.

Anderson v. Lockhardt

62 Misc. 2d 815 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1970

Land & Buildings ”), it does not confer upon the Planning Board the power to issue building permits. … Said determination is, therefore, not reviewable under article 78 (see Matter of Thurman v. Snowden, 28 A D 2d 705; cf. Matter of Milton Point Assn. v.