Case law

Spicer v. Norton

13 Barb. 542 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1852

Hunt v. Brown, 5 Hill, 145 . Newcomb v. Clark, 1 Denio, 226 .) The form of expression is not material. It is enough (said Ch. Justice Tindal in 1 Bing. N. … If the decision in Brown v.

McCright v. Mercer County Area Vo-Tech. School

30 Pa. D. & C.3d 495 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County · Apr 15, 1982

Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 173 Pa. Super. 324 , 98 A.2d 410 (1953). Kinkella v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 173 Pa. Super. 329 , 98 A.2d 413 (1953). … United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 359 Pa. 195 , 58 A.2d 833 (1949). Northside Laundry Co. v.

Danielewicz v. Aurigema

116 Misc. 2d 17 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1982

Subsequent to his resignation, he was reappointed by the town board for the balance of the term. … (See Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections, 100 Misc 2d 570 ; Matter of Hunting v Power, 20 NY2d 680 .)

Croft v. Arthur

3 S.C. Eq. 223 · Court of Chancery of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1811

Townsend executed a bill of sale for seven negroes, -to Clement Brown, executor of George Arthur, in consideration of 210k On the 31st December, 1791/ Townsend executed a bond to Clement Brown, conditioned to pay 200k on … And we find that several respectable men, who afterwards examined the accounts as arbitrators, were of opinion that nothing was due by Townsend to Arthur’s estate, for that his charges for board, clothing and educating the

Coalition to Save Hill v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson

28 Misc. 3d 1084 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2010

(McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes §§ 91, 98; People v Finley, 10 NY3d 647 [2008]; Friedman v Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 9 NY3d 105 [2007].) … (See Statutes § 145; Jenkins v Fieldbridge Assoc., LLC, 65 AD3d 169 [2d Dept 2009].)

Town of Berwick v. York County Board of Commissioners

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2015

Assessors, Bristol v. Eldridge, 392 A.2d 37, 39-40 (Me. 1978); see also Conn. Bank & Tr. Co., N.A. v. … To the extent the Board committed reversible error, the Town's remedy is for the decision to be vacated. This does not require the Board to be joined as a party. See Quoddy Realty Corp. v.

Cohen-Fein Co. Appeal

83 Pa. D. & C. 367 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Jul 29, 1952

Board of Property Assessment, etc., 359 Pa. 195 . … Short v. Board of the School District of Upper Moreland Township, supra, is distinguished upon the significant ground that the matter at issue in that case was clearly not a court record.

Kellogg v. Travis

188 Misc. 2d 164 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2001

(Lynce v Mathis, 519 US 433, 441 [1997].) … statute]; Roe v Marcotte, 193 F3d 72 [2d Cir 1999] [Connecticut’s statute]; Shaffer v Saffle, 148 F3d 1180 [10th Cir 1998] [Oklahoma’s statute]; Boling v Romer, 101 F3d 1336 [10th Cir 1996] [Colorado’s statute]; Rise v Oregon

Mayer v. American Insurance Co. of Boston

2 N.Y.S. 227 · City of New York Municipal Court · Sep 10, 1888

Browne, J. … The rule was sanctioned in Haley v. Insurance Co., 1 Allen, 536 ; Angelrodt v. Insurance Co., 31 Mo. 593 ; Cromie v. Insurance Co., 15 B. Mon. 432 .

People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways of Poughkeepsie & Fishkill v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Dutchess

1 Hill & Den. 50 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1841

At an adjourned meeting of the board of supérvisors of Dutchess, held- on the 13th December, 1839, the commissioners of highways of' the towns of Fishkill and Poughkeepsie, applied to the board to take the charge and control … The relators thereupon obtained an alternative mandamus, calling on the board of supervisors to vacate the second resolution, which required the money to be raised by the two towns, and directing the board to cause the said

Shaw v. City of Cincinnati

1 Ohio N.P. 88 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Nov 15, 1894

ownership of a vacant lot situated on the northwest corner of Colerain and Elam avenues in said city, with a platted frontage on Colerain avenue of 46.44 feet, and abutting on Elam avenue 148.86 feet; that in October, 1891, the board … See also Moore v. Dunn, 41 Ohio St. 62 . A very exhaustive consideration of this subject is stated in three several opinions by Justice Field in 94 U. S., Cromwell v. County of Sac., 351; Davis v. Brown, 421; Russell v.

Minix v. Wells Fargo Bank

81 Va. Cir. 130 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Aug 24, 2010

Ford Motor Co. v. Benitez, 273 Va. 242, 250 , 639 S.E.2d 203, 206 (2007). … Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 19965 (E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2010). Mr. Brown has had his opportunity to have his novel theories be heard.

Foster v. Commonwealth

46 Va. Cir. 234 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jul 27, 1998

See Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 844 (1990). … Virginia Retirement System v. Rizzo, 23 Va. App. 698, 706 (1997).

SPR Corp. v. Fauquier County

25 Va. Cir. 8 · Fauquier County Circuit Court · Oct 2, 1990

Jur. 2d, Specific Performance, §§ 57-59; 17 M.J., Specific Performance, § 38; Brown v. Friedberg, 127 Va. 1, 3 (1920); Love v. Braxton, 9 Va. (5 Call) 537 (1805). … See Brown at 4 .

Hollister v. City of Rochester

41 Misc. 559 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1903

The street was improved during the summer of 1895, and completed and accepted by the executive board of the city in October, 1895, and thereafter, in July, 1896, the common council confirmed the assessment-roll and the entire … Y. 667 , in which case Judge Bookstaver said: “ The learned counsel for the appellant contends that since the settlement of the Brown controversy, the ownership of the lots affected by this assessment has been changed several

Selinsgrove Area School District v. Krebs

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 662 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Snyder County · Jul 3, 1985

. §6-686(b) (Supp. 1985), provides for the appointment of a delinquent tax collector by the board of school directors. … This court’s opinion is fully supported by and in accordance with Brown v. Lesuer, 149 Pa. Super. 192 , 27 A.2d 754 (1942).

Ohio Real Estate Commission v. Cohen

90 Ohio Law. Abs. 137 · Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 25, 1962

Brown Against Mr. … their unanimous revocation of Appellant’s real estate broker’s license is as follows: “Upon due consideration to the testimony and evidence presented in the hearing for the complaint of Ohio Real Estate *144 Commission v.

Johnson v. Timmerman

92 Misc. 2d 626 · New York County Courts · Jan 6, 1978

OPINION OF THE COURT John V. Aylward, J. … (See Rieder v State Univ. of N. Y., 47 AD2d 865 , mot to dismiss app den 36 NY2d 965 .)

Voccola v. Shilling

88 Misc. 2d 103 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1976

Browne. A brief review of the facts is required in order to properly address the issues presented herein. Six parking violation summonses were issued against respondent Browne’s vehicle. … Browne (Docket No. CC-17238) and to dismiss Browne’s order to show cause as being beyond the jurisdiction of the Civil Court.

Rivera v. Blum

98 Misc. 2d 1002 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1978

(Matter of Brown v Lavine, 37 NY2d 317 .) … (Matter of Groban, 352 US 330 ; Madera v Board of Educ., supra; Wasson v Trowbridge, supra; Matter of Popper v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 26 AD2d 871 .)