Case law

Fossella v. Dinkins

128 Misc. 2d 822 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1985

Thus, while the court agrees with the intervenors-respondents that a failure to file objections within the time specified in the statute would require dismissal of the petition {Matter ofDe Santis v Brown, 37 AD2d 865 ) it … Matter of Stanley v Board of Appeals, 168 Misc 797 ).

Shade-Central City School District v. Class of 1974

1 Pa. D. & C.3d 376 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County · May 24, 1976

In Pease v. … Compare Commonwealth v.

Jaquith v. Simon

35 Misc. 2d 508 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1962

Fasbender, 1 N Y 2d 212, 233; Thompson v. Wallin, 301 N. Y. 476, 488 , affd. sub nom. Adler v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 342 U. S. 485, 801, 951 ). … In Matter of Davis v. Board of Elections of City of N.

Wilson v. Karatinos

52 Pa. D. & C.2d 122 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · May 20, 1971

Brown-Borhek Company, 414 Pa. 325 , 200 A.2d 398 (1964); Poole v. Great American Insurance Company, 407 Pa. 652 , 182 A.2d 509 (1962); Ross v. Metropolitan Life Ins. … Board of Finance and Revenue, 409 Pa. 180 , 185 A.2d 542 (1962); Schrader v. Heath, 408 Pa. 79 , 182 A.2d 696 (1962). The court must consider all the pleadings when ruling upon the motion made by defendant: Herman v.

Greene v. Foremost Locations, Inc.

12 Misc. 2d 170 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1958

such structure shall only be built at the same time or after as a dwelling house has been erected on the front part of the premises in accordance with the building restrictions herein contained and that no sign or bill board … (Kitching v. Brown, 180 N. Y. 414, 427 ; see, also, Pierson v. Rellstab Bros., 219 App. Div. 552 , affd. 246 N. Y. 608 ; Heller v. Seltzer, 188 Misc. 574 ; Shaddock v. Walters, 55 N. Y. S. 2d 635.)

Johnson v. Timmerman

92 Misc. 2d 626 · New York County Courts · Jan 6, 1978

OPINION OF THE COURT John V. Aylward, J. … (See Rieder v State Univ. of N. Y., 47 AD2d 865 , mot to dismiss app den 36 NY2d 965 .)

Kephart v. Looker

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 520 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County · Apr 10, 1981

BROWN, P.J., This litigation involves a dispute over the propriety of certain actions of the board of trustees of defendant corporation not for profit which affected the rights of plaintiffs to remove and appoint trustees … material fact, and the record, viewed most favorably to the non-moving party, reveals that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, then a summary judgment may be granted under Pa.R.C.P. 1035(b): Dowlin v.

Franklin v. Town of Rome Board of Appeals

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 29, 2023

Neither record contains findings of fact or conclusions of law by the Planning Board. The Court is thus unable to nndertake meaningful judicial review of the Plauning Board's decision. Lamarre v. … This matter must therefore be remanded to the Planning Board. See Mills v. Town ofEliot, 2008 ME 134, ,r 20, 955 A.2d 258.

Hollister v. City of Rochester

41 Misc. 559 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1903

The street was improved during the summer of 1895, and completed and accepted by the executive board of the city in October, 1895, and thereafter, in July, 1896, the common council confirmed the assessment-roll and the entire … Y. 667 , in which case Judge Bookstaver said: “ The learned counsel for the appellant contends that since the settlement of the Brown controversy, the ownership of the lots affected by this assessment has been changed several

In re R.R.

138 Ohio Misc. 2d 9 · Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court · Nov 8, 2004

In the first case, State v. … Brown (1995), 101 Ohio App.3d 784 , 656 N.E.2d 741 .

Prather v. First Presbyterian Society

13 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 169 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jun 25, 1912

Co. v. … This rule is amply and fully sustained in the following eases: American Contracting Co. v. Sammon, 6 C.C.(N.S.), 121, 4th Syllabus; Ch., V. & T. R. R. Co. v. Shannon, 4th C. C., 449, 3d Syl.; Sibila v. Bahney, 34 O.

Selinsgrove Area School District v. Krebs

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 662 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Snyder County · Jul 3, 1985

. §6-686(b) (Supp. 1985), provides for the appointment of a delinquent tax collector by the board of school directors. … This court’s opinion is fully supported by and in accordance with Brown v. Lesuer, 149 Pa. Super. 192 , 27 A.2d 754 (1942).

Noel v. Chesterfield County

37 Va. Cir. 219 · Chesterfield County Circuit Court · Aug 18, 1995

Phillips v. Telum, Inc., 223 Va. 585, 590 (1982); Gayton Triangle v. Henrico County, 216 Va. 764, 766-67 (1976); Dick Kelly Enterprises v. City of Norfolk, 243 Va. 373 (1992). … The Court said that the landowner had the opportunity *220 as a matter of right to appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals and then to the Circuit Court. The case at hand can be distinguished from Rinker v.

Toledo Consolidated St. Ry. Co. v. Toledo Electric St. Ry. Co.

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 643 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1893

This John Brown was summoned.' His name appears, and Michael Brown was the man who appeared and answered to the name of John. … There was the fact — he answered to the name of John Brown. He was not specifically asked if he was John Brown.

Danielewicz v. Aurigema

116 Misc. 2d 17 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1982

Subsequent to his resignation, he was reappointed by the town board for the balance of the term. … (See Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections, 100 Misc 2d 570 ; Matter of Hunting v Power, 20 NY2d 680 .)

Croft v. Arthur

3 S.C. Eq. 223 · Court of Chancery of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1811

Townsend executed a bill of sale for seven negroes, -to Clement Brown, executor of George Arthur, in consideration of 210k On the 31st December, 1791/ Townsend executed a bond to Clement Brown, conditioned to pay 200k on … And we find that several respectable men, who afterwards examined the accounts as arbitrators, were of opinion that nothing was due by Townsend to Arthur’s estate, for that his charges for board, clothing and educating the

People ex rel. Dixon v. Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole

89 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1977

to the case at bar, the majority of said court affirmed an order directing the Board of Parole to remove an added one year of reformatory delinquent time. … Lopez v La Vallee ( 43 AD2d 647 ). (See, also, People v Edwards, 45 AD2d 743 , and People v Miller, 38 AD2d 745 .) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Railway Co. v. Edmondson

13 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 377 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Oct 16, 1912

Richardson v. U. S. Mortgage Co., 194 Ill., 268. In the case of Jiminson v. … Brown v. Hughes, 89 Minn., 150 .

Town of Hempstead v. West 45th Street Associates, Inc.

8 Misc. 2d 997 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1957

In Jerome v. Ross ( 7 Johns. … In those cases the remedy at law is not ample and complete (Ashburn v. Graves, 149 F. 968, 972 ). The application for a preliminary injunction is denied (O’Reilly v. New Yok El. R. R. Co., 148 N. Y. 347 ; Wormser v.

Mayer v. American Insurance Co. of Boston

2 N.Y.S. 227 · City of New York Municipal Court · Sep 10, 1888

Browne, J. … The rule was sanctioned in Haley v. Insurance Co., 1 Allen, 536 ; Angelrodt v. Insurance Co., 31 Mo. 593 ; Cromie v. Insurance Co., 15 B. Mon. 432 .