Case law

Gilson v. Brown

5 Pa. D. & C. 725 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County · Sep 2, 1924

Brown against said decedent $234.04, and to his wife, Mrs. Brown, $298.29. It also appears that said plaintiff, as administrator of said estafe, made a public sale of decedent’s personal property, and that A. H. … Brown and wife, the plaintiff, acting as administrator, drew a check to A. H. Brown for $234.04, which was endorsed by him and returned to the administrator; and a check of $298.29 payable to Mrs.

Brown v. Nickel

1 Balt. C. Rep. 212 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Oct 5, 1891

Mead v. Brown

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 477 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1911

The account attached and marked Exhibit A reads as follows: Jane Brown & Sons, Dr., to "W. IT. … I am cited by the plaintiff to the 50th Ohio State, Newark Machine Company v.

Alexander v. Brown

2 Disney (Ohio) 395 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Nov 15, 1858

Kleinman v. Brown

30 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 69 · Cincinnati Municipal Court · Nov 19, 1932

Gibson v. Mundell, 29 O. S. 525, 529. … To the same effect see Bulla v. Kent, 15 O. D. N. P. 409. The proceedings in aid of execution are therefor dismissed.

Cole v. Brown

33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 450 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Nov 4, 1908

Brown v. Trottner

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 222 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Feb 14, 1896

An appeal was taken by Brown to the court of common pleas. … On this proposition we are cited by counsel for defendant in error to the case of Clapp et al., v. Banking Co. et al., 50 O. S., beginning on page 528.

Schultz v. Brown

2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 353 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1889

Dickson v. Rawson, 5 O. S., 218, 224; Loudenback v. Foster, 39 O. S., 203. … Lessee of Burgett v. Burgett, 1 O., 469 ; Bump on Fraudulent Conveyances, 490.

Brown v. State

30 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 439 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · May 29, 1933

(N.S.) page 513 and do heartily concur with the views expressed by Judge McMahon of this court in the case of Taylor et al v. The New System Prosthetic Dental Laboratory, Inc., et al., 29 N. P. (N.S.) 451. … Brown is operating, but next month another dentist may be operating and .the following month still another, patients would be likely to be misled, possibly, indeed probably, to their injury.

Caldwell v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 691 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1895

The action was first brought before a justice of the peace, Judgment was recovered by Brown, from which Caldwell appealed. … This section was under consideration by this court at the last term of this court, in the case of Foy v, The Toledo Consolidated Street Ry.

Brown v. State

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 138 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Apr 30, 1910

Ryle v. Brown

18 Jones & S. 174 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 3, 1884

Brown v. Combes

4 Jones & S. 572 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 28, 1873

Brown v. Recknagel

24 Jones & S. 330 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 7, 1889

Brown v. Ney

26 Jones & S. 583 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 5, 1890

People v. Brown

21 N.Y.S. 1130 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jan 6, 1893

Brown v. Ney

9 N.Y.S. 959 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · May 5, 1890

Brown v. Lowe

10 N.Y.S. 956 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 26, 1890

Irwin v. Brown

10 N.Y.S. 958 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Jun 27, 1890

Haas v. Brown

20 Misc. 672 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jul 15, 1897