Case law

Ampt ex rel. City of Cincinnati v. City of Cincinnati

2 Ohio N.P. 332 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Mar 15, 1895

Brown and H. M. Ziegler are respectively the auditor and treasurer of said city. … Brown, as auditor of said city, be enjoined from drawing, and H. M.

Vanderslice v. Moessner

18 Pa. D. & C.3d 9 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 4, 1981

In Markley v. Brown, 66 Lane. 301 (1978), plaintiff alleged bills which “may exceed Seven Hundred Fifty ($750.00) Dollars in the future.” Judge Paul A. … In Mabey v.

Thomas v. Turco

17 Misc. 3d 402 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2007

On July 26, 2007, a certificate of substitution was filed with the Board of Elections, designating Eric Kitchen in the place and stead of Craig Artist. … Artist as the candidate of the Independence Party for the office of town councilman of the Town of Ulster was filed in the office of the Ulster County Board of Elections on July 19, 2007.

People v. Diaz

153 Misc. 2d 291 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1992

The defendants Ramon Diaz, Marlon Brown and Miguel *292 Justino are charged with criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. All three defendants have moved to suppress the gun recovered from the car. … The rear passenger, defendant Brown, was then told to get out, frisked and moved to the back of the car. No weapon was found on the defendants. Officer Fuchs then returned to the car and proceeded to search for a gun.

Point Gratiot Sand v. Hartford Fire Insurance

77 Misc. 221 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1912

In the case of Pelton v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., 77 N. Y. 605 , a policy of insurance was issued to one Brown with loss, if any, payable to the plaintiff, “ as collateral, as his interest may appear.” … The court held that in equity Brown was the owner, and had not misrepresented the fact when he stated to the insurance company, when he made application for the policy, that he owned the premises. See also Sewell v.

People v. Banks

146 Misc. 2d 601 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1989

clause rights in order to prevent [Oscar Brown’s] prior grand jury testimony * * * from being admitted against him.’ ” (Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, supra, 92 AD2d, at 412-413, 415 ; see also, United States v Mastrangelo … Brown.

Efessiou v. Efessiou

41 Va. Cir. 142 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Nov 12, 1996

On September 11, 1995, Husband purportedly called a Board of Directors meeting of Strategic and elected Angelides to the Board of Directors and to the positions of Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. … Under Brown v. Bedford City Land & Imp.

Cole v. Rome Savings Bank

96 Misc. 188 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1916

And the presumption is that the parties intended to contract for the performance of lawful acts and not those which would be unlawful. 16 Cyc. 1082; Willmarth v. Crawford, 10 Wend. 341, 344 ; Brown v. … Brown, 34 Barb. 533 ; Korn v. Shedler, 11 Daly, 234 .

3 Lafayette Avenue Corp. v. Comptroller of New York

152 Misc. 2d 108 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1991

"The act sought to be compelled must be ministerial, nondiscretionary and nonjudgmental, and [must] be premised upon specific statutory authority mandating performance in a specific manner” (Matter of Brown v New York State … The stay permitted by CPLR 5519 (a) has been strictly construed (see, Baker v Board of Educ., 152 AD2d 1014 ; Walker v Delaware & Hudson R. R. Co., 120 AD2d 919).

Keehn v. City of Wooster

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 456 · Wayne Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1897

The Board of Education of the City of Huron; but that case is distinguishable from the case at bar in this : there the bonds were issued under a statute which authorized the board of education to issue bonds and apply the … Ogden v. County of Davies, 102 U. S., 634 ; Marsh v. Fulton County, 10 Wall., 676 ; South Ottawa v. Perkins, 94 U. S., 260 ; Northern Bank v. Porter Township, 110 U. S., 608 ; Hayes v. Holly Springs, 114 U.

Coon v. Syracuse & Utica Rail-Road

6 Barb. 231 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1849

Murray v. South Carolina R. R., 1 McMullen, 385. Brown v. Maxwell, 6 Hill, 592 .) Do the facts in the present case present the same questions ? and if not, do they present questions differing essentially in principle ? … The reasoning of Chief Justice Shaw, in Farwell v.

Flour City National Bank v. Garfield

37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1883

They then drew a bill of exchange on that bank, payable to the order of Brown, Shipley & Co., of London, which, together with the bill of lading, was presented to Brown, Brothers & Co., of the city of New York, who purchased … (Marine Bank v. Jauncey, 1 Barb. *586 [S. C.], 486; Hoyt v. Story, 3 id., 263; Clark v. Mauran, 3 Paige, 373 ; Morton v. Naylor, 1 Hill, 583 ; Cayuga County Bank v. Daniels, 47 N. Y., 637; Bailey v. Hudson River R. R.

Whitt v. Cook

22 Ohio Misc. 254 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Feb 13, 1970

Newell, v. Brown, 162 Ohio St. 147 . See, also, State v. Brown, 38 Ohio St. 344 ; State, ex rel., v. Tanzey, 49 Ohio St. 656 ; State, ex rel. Tauger, v. Nash, 66 Ohio St. 612 ; Brissel v. State, ex rel. … Wesselman, v. Board of Education, 170 Ohio St. 30 , which was overruled in part on other grounds in 7 Ohio St. 2d 85 . In the case of State, ex rel., v.

Englis v. Furniss

2 Abb. Pr. 333 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1855

In Bailey v. … The case of Jacand v.

Miller v. Urban Redevelopment Authority

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 262 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Oct 29, 1973

But Rader v. … Page 615. *265 Brown v.

Palmer v. Lawrence

6 Lans. 282 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1872

This new rule of law is-said to be established by the case of Brown v. … (Barhydt v. Shepard, 35 N. Y., 238 ; The People v. Reddy, 43 Barb., 540 ; Henderson v. Brown , 1 Caines., 92; Hill v. Selick, 21 Barb., 207 .)

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. National Education Ass'n of United States

63 Misc. 2d 338 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1970

Plaintiff relies on the recent New Jersey case of Board of Educ., Borough of Union Beach v. New Jersey Educ. Assn. (96 N. J. Super. 371, affd. 53 N. J. 29). … Affidavits from people in attendance at public meetings of the school board also quote Mr. Wallen as saying in words or substance 1 ‘ We are not having any trouble hiring people ’ ’.

Sperling v. Euclid Building & Loan Ass'n

16 Pa. D. & C. 487 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 21, 1932

The defendant relies on the recent case of Brown v. … In Mercer v. Ambler Building and Loan Ass’n, 10 Pa. C.

Barnes v. Seligman

8 N.Y.S. 834 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1890

The same rule was laid down in Pollen v. Le Roy, 30 N. Y. 549 , and Windmuller v. Pope, 107 N. Y. 674 , 14 N. E. Rep. 436. … Y. 68 ; Bank v. Morgan, 73 N. Y. 593 ; and Pope v. Cole, 55 N. Y. 124 ,—in no way conflict with this proposition.

Canvass of Absentee Ballots of November 2, 1965, General Election

39 Pa. D. & C.2d 429 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Dec 30, 1965

In the case of Perles v. … In the case of Nancy Olivia Brown, who was a student on the west coast, it was agreed that she received a defective ballot, so a second ballot was sent her.