Case law

People v. Bannett

40 Misc. 2d 296 · New York County Courts · Aug 2, 1963

(Barkmann v. Town of Hempstead, supra. See People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105 .) … Th Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483, 493 ) described the value of education.

In re City of New York

58 Misc. 2d 1073 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1968

By then it was entirely vacant and boarded up. … Rosenberg v.

Merritt v. Earle

31 Barb. 38 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1859

In Allen v. … Lott, Emott and Brown, Justices.]

Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad

20 N.Y.S. 708 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Nov 7, 1892

at, and a little below, the surface,.so that the defective condition of the board could have been detected upon inspection from below, but was not apparent on its surface. … Unquestionably the master may not be held responsible without proof of negligence on his part, and his negligence will never be presumed, (Dobbins v Brown, 119 N. Y. 188 , 23 N. E.

Deyo v. Bleakley

24 Barb. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1856

(See Doe v. Watton, Cowper, 189.) The rule adopted in Pugh v. … Brown, S. B. Strong and Birdseye, Justices.]

Stuart v. Blatchley

28 N.Y.S. 800 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1894

Brown and James E. Kent claim to own such interests by virtue of a deed from G-. Ambrose Blatchley, the sole heir at law of said Hortensius; and that the defendants Nellie V. Watson and Millie L. … Hagerty v. Andrews, 94 N. Y. 198 ; Shannon v. Picked, 2 N. Y. St. Rep. 160.

Kuechler v. Township of Middletown

21 Pa. D. & C.3d 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Apr 21, 1980

See Soergel v. Board of Supervisors of Middlesex Township, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 311 , 316 A. 2d 89 (1974), and Kretzler v. Ohio Township, supra. … Brown, 230 Pa. Superior Ct. 214 , 326 A. 2d 906 (1974), and the subjective intent of the officer is immaterial when he communicates in some way to defendant that he is deprived of his liberty: Com. v.

Voisin v. Commercial Mut. Ins.

35 N.Y.S. 873 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1895

Brown, called by the plaintiff, testified that he was an agent of the underwriters; that he never saw the vessel until after the 1st of June, 1882, when she was lying at Horfolk, Va. … Brown were asked for an opinion, based on the same undisputed facts, with a single exception, about to be stated.

Barnes v. Camack

1 Barb. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1847

In Dickerson v. … (Padgett v. Lawrence, 10 Paige, 170 . Millspaugh v. McBride, 7 Id. 509. Daniel v. Mitchell, 1 Story’s Rep. 172. McCarthy v. Decaix, 1 Russ. & Mylne, 614.) Hyde v.

Newcomer Estate

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 457 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Sep 13, 1978

“Until a dividend of the profits of a corporation has been declared by its board of directors, a stockholder has no legal title to any interest in them. … See also Browne v. Maxwell et al., 288 Pa. 398 , 136 Atl. 232 (1927).

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. National Education Ass'n of United States

63 Misc. 2d 338 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1970

Plaintiff relies on the recent New Jersey case of Board of Educ., Borough of Union Beach v. New Jersey Educ. Assn. (96 N. J. Super. 371, affd. 53 N. J. 29). … Affidavits from people in attendance at public meetings of the school board also quote Mr. Wallen as saying in words or substance 1 ‘ We are not having any trouble hiring people ’ ’.

People v. Sharp

5 N.Y. Crim. 388 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1887

Brown who was in their employment. And the testimony of Brown, as a witness, was that the bills which were received were large bills, mostly of the denomination of a thousand dollars. … Weyman v. People, 4 Hun, 511 . Mayer v. People, 80 N. Y., 364 . People v.

Jerome's Grill, Inc. v. Sea Grill, Inc.

3 Mass. App. Dec. 28 · Boston Municipal Court · Jan 23, 1951

Blackball v. Duthie-Strachan, 258 Mass. 551, 553 ; Fiske v. Ballou, 264 Mass. 530, 553 . … Suburban Land Co., Inc. v. Brown, 237 Mass. 166, 167 ; Wallis v. Inhabitants of Wenham, 204 Mass. 83 ; Rigs v. Sokol, 318 Mass. 337, 345 ; Eliot Nat. Bank v. Beal, 141 Mass. 565 , 568; Williston, CONTRACTS (Rev.

Pounds v. Lee Avenue Theatre Co.

84 Misc. 623 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1914

Browning, King & Co. v. Stover, 145 App. … *627 Board of Education, 176 N.

Leschinski v. W. C. Hack & Sons

47 Pa. D. & C. 469 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County · Dec 21, 1942

Brown et ux., 291 Pa. 53 ; Kelly, Murray, Inc., v. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co., 299 Pa. 236, 241 . Defendant contends that A. G. … McClain Fuel Corp., to use, v. Lineinger, 341 Pa. 364 . In Bowman v.

People v. Praete

32 Misc. 2d 595 · New York Court of Special Session · Feb 16, 1962

In support of his argument he cited the case of People v. Robbin ( 20 Misc 2d 429 ). … To follow the case of People v.

Neeson v. Bray

19 N.Y.S. 841 · Superior Court of Buffalo · Jul 8, 1892

Van Schoonhoven v. Curley, 86 N. Y. 187 ; Kent, Comm. 460; Platt v. Crawford, 8 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 297; Jackson v. Catlin, 2 Johns. 263 . … Bank v. Davis, 2 Hill, 451 ; Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354 ; Adams v. Conover, 87 N. Y. 422 ; Bennett v. Buchan, 76 N. Y. 386 ; Bank v. Delano, 48 N. Y. 326 .

People ex rel. Boltzer v. Daley

44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1885

An extreme case was that of The King v. Brown, a note of which will be found in 3 Term, 574, under the title of Pex'v. … Case v. Collins ( 19 Wend., 56 ). In the case of People v. Halsey ( 37 N.

A. F. Hutchinson Land Co. v. Whitehead Bros.

127 Misc. 558 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1926

Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. 13 ; Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600 ; Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315 ; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 365 ; Reid v. Board of Ed., 73 Mo. 304 .” … L. 667; Beardslee v. French, 7 Conn. 125 ; Board of Education v. Edson, 18 Ohio St. 221 ; Gumbert’s Appeal, 110 Penn. St. 496; Tracy v. Bittle, supra.)

Chesterfield County v. Karnes

36 Va. Cir. 186 · Chesterfield County Circuit Court · Apr 4, 1995

This matter is before the Court on appeal of the decision rendered by the State Building Code Technical Review Board (TRB). … The State Building Code Technical Review Board upheld the decision of the BBCA ruling that the County was required to serve the notice of violation.