Case law

Andrews v. Board of Social Worker Licensure

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 2, 2005

Connolly v. Board of Social Worker Licensure, 2002 ME 37, ql 6; 791 A.2d 125, 127. … See Grifin v.

Marathon Oil v. Mercuria Energy America

2025 Tex. Bus. 36 · Texas Business Court · Sep 18, 2025

v. … Polyco, Inc. v. Tex. Cent. Bus. Lines Corp., 681 S.W.3d 383, 390 n.3 (Tex. 2023) (per curiam); see also Brown, 660 S.W.3d at 754. 18 U.S.

Sheldon v. Chappell

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 59 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

Sonley v. The Clock Makers’ Company (1 Brown’s Ch. R., 81), is a case precisely in point. … In De Barante v.

Hennessey v. Volkening

30 Abb. N. Cas. 100 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1893

Brown and Hunt v. McFadgen, supra). … Martin v. Brown. 55 N. Y. 180 ; Cagwin v. Hancock, 84 Id. 532). Indeed, in People v. Chapin ( 104 N.

People v. Golding

55 Misc. 425 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1907

Action ¡No. 1 is an action in ejectment brought to recover possession of a piece of land bordering on the west shore of Baqnette lake northerly of Brown’s *427 Tract inlet. … Rich v. Braxton, 158 H. S. 375;. People ex rel. Barnard v. Wemple, 117 N. Y. 85 . The tax was never extended by the board of supervisors. This rendered the roll and the warrant fatally defective.

Brandt v. Godwin

3 N.Y.S. 807 · City of New York Municipal Court · Feb 6, 1889

Browne, J. … The board of directors of the company are inferentially the board referred to in the notice of discharge.

Webster Associates v. Town of Webster

112 Misc. 2d 396 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1981

. v County of Erie, 62 AD2d 1176, 1177 ; Sloane v Weber, 52 AD2d 1055). … Assn, v Burns, 372 F Supp 223 , affd 517 F2d lOll; Appalachian Mountain Club v Brinegar, 394 F Supp 105 ).

Tribune Ass'n v. Sleeman

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 343 · City of New York Municipal Court · Feb 15, 1887

This court, in Schlesinger v. … Matthews v. Tufts, 87 N. Y., 568 . This authority effectually shields non-resident suitors not only from civil arrests, but from service of all process eundo morando et redeundo, and settles the present contention.

Mohawk Valley Nursing Home, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

153 Misc. 2d 996 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1992

Employees Assn. v Newman, 90 AD2d 114 ). … Elizabeth Community Hosp. v National Labor Relations Bd., 708 F2d 1436).

Hatch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

9 Abb. N. Cas. 430 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1881

The board shall fix the amount of increase necessary for the purpose aforesaid.” … The latest authority on this subject is Barnes v. Brown ( 80 N. Y. 527, 534 ).

Fleming's Appeal

16 Pa. D. & C. 59 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County · Nov 3, 1930

Justice Moschzisker in McCauley v. … Justice Brown, in delivering the opinion of the court, says: “No right of appeal from the action of the court below is given by any statute, and counsel for appellants frankly admit that one does not lie.

People v. Viking Press, Inc.

147 Misc. 813 · New York City Magistrates' Court · May 23, 1933

(People v. Wendling, 258 N. Y. 451 ; Halsey v. N. Y. Society for the Suppression of Vice, 234 id. 1.) (See, also, People v. Brainard, 192 App. … Mason Brown, dramatic critic of the New York Evening Post; Sidonie M.

Morse v. Williamson

35 Barb. 472 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1861

By the Court, Brown, J. … (Embury v. Conner, 3 Comst. 511.) See also Stafford v.

Board of Mgrs. of the Promenade Condominium v. Eshaghpour

2024 NY Slip Op 32963(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Aug 20, 2024

Board of Mgrs. of the Promenade Condominium v Eshaghpour 2024 NY Slip Op 32963(U) August 20, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index … and in good faith.” (72 Poplar Townhouse, LLC v Board of Mgrs. of the 72 Poplar St.

Rabouin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

182 Misc. 2d 632 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1999

(Uhlman v New York Life Ins. Co., 109 NY 421 [1888]; Greeff v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 160 NY 19 [1899]; see also, Equitable Life Assur. Socy. v Brown, 213 US 25 [1909].) … MetLife also relies heavily on the “business judgment rule,” which shields from judicial scrutiny most decisions of a corporate Board of Directors. (See, Auerbach v Bennett, 47 NY2d 619 [1979].)

Smalls v. White Plains Housing Authority

34 Misc. 2d 949 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1962

The court is of the opinion that this section is not applicable to the White Plains Housing Authority, which is a municipal corporation and not a department, board, bureau, office, authority or commission of the State. … Lodes v. Department of Health of the City of N. Y., 189 N. Y. 187 ; Matter of Browne v. Rice, 171 Misc. 695 , affd. 259 App. Div. 847 , appeal dismissed 283 N. Y. 684 ; Matter of Lerner v. Casey, 138 N. Y.

People v. Regan

110 Misc. 2d 12 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1981

(CPL 30.30, subd 4; People v Hamilton, 46 NY2d 932, 933 , supra; People v Washington, 43 NY2d 772, 773 ; People v Dean, 45 NY2d 651, 656 ; People v Brothers, 50 NY2d 413, 416 .) … (See People v Byrnes, 33 NY2d 343 ; People v Epps, 37 NY2d 343 .)

White v. Board of Education of East Irondequoit Central School District No. 1

53 Misc. 2d 800 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1967

(Marasse v. Buchmueller, 35 Misc 2d 643 ; Matter of Pacos v. Hunter, 29 Misc 2d 404 , affd. 14 A D 2d 990, app. dsmd. 11 N Y 2d 1112; Finley v. Spaulding, 274 App. Div. 522 ; Turco v. Union Free School Dist. … No. 4, 43 Misc 2d 367 , affd. 22 A D 2d 1018; Guariglia *802 v. De Furio, 34 Misc 2d 200 , affd. 17 A D 2d 905.) We point out that in Turco v. Union Free School Dist.

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. Pace College

50 Misc. 2d 806 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1966

That the plaintiff has a valid general grant of power to condemn lands for school purposes cannot be doubted (Education Law, § 404, subd. 2; Board of Educ. v. Harper, 191 N. Y. S. 273). … Board of Educ., 234 N. Y. 196 ). The right to condemn is subject to strict construction (Society of N. Y. Hosp. v.

Daly v. Eagan

77 Misc. 2d 279 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1972

If the applications were to be processed by the Boards of Appeals, the boards would be acting as Planning Boards, a function for which they were not designed. (Van Deusen v. Jackson, 35 A D 2d 58, affd. 28 N Y 2d 608.) … Neither the Board of Appeals nor the Planning Board can exercise legislative power. (Van Deusen v. Jackson, 35 A D 2d 58, affd. 28 N Y 2d 608.)