Case law

Wanamaker Estate

67 Pa. D. & C. 517 · Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · Jun 10, 1949

The late president judge of the Municipal Court, Judge Brown, who frequently sat in the juvenile division of that court, explained to the master that the Pennypack House was just the type of place that decedent had in mind … The instruction is given by two teachers who are supplied by the board of education. The boys are not committed for a specified term.

Edgerly v. Emerson

23 N.H. 555 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1851

Munson, 4 Ver., 308; Pritchard v. Brown, 4 N. H. Rep., 400. … Four constitute a quorum, and when assembled, possess all the powers of the entire board.

Santos v. Chappell

63 Misc. 2d 730 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1970

Raynor v. New York & Long Island Traction Co.

86 Misc. 201 · New York County Courts · Jun 15, 1914

White- *205 house v. … Schoe llkopf v. Coatsworth, 166 N. Y. 77, 84 ; Sanford v. Brown Brothers Co., 208 id. 90, 96 .

Scarsdale Supply Co. v. Village of Scarsdale

15 Misc. 2d 289 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1958

Municipalities are not required to zone property so as to produce the highest return for the owner (Matter of Wulfsohn v. Burden, supra; Brown v. Village of Owego, 260 App. Div. 328 , affd. 284 N. Y. 655 ; Kraft v. … Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N. Y. 222 ).

People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of Workhouse

127 Misc. 224 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1925

(See People v. Papia, App. Part of Special Sessions, Dec. 4, 1923, citing People v. Brown, 153 App. Div. 234, 235 , and People ex rel. Horowitz v. Hanley, 106 Misc. 625 .) … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals of City of New York, 234 N. Y. 484, 495 .) It is presumed that the Legislature did not intend an absurd result. (People v. Pfeiffen, 118 Misc. 403 .) In 36 Cyc.

Parent v. Administrator

81 Ohio Law. Abs. 97 · Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas · May 22, 1959

The Supreme Court in the State of Ohio v. … The decision of the Board of Review is reversed as being contrary to law. An entry may be draw by counsel accordingly.

Slevin v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center

66 Misc. 2d 312 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1971

(Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. Brown, 22 N Y 2d 488 ; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, 1 N Y 2d 508.) … (Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. Brown, 22 N Y 2d 488, supra.)

Mazzone v. Mazzone

24 Pa. D. & C.3d 397 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Feb 13, 1981

Governmental immunity: Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 305 A. 2d 877 , 453 Pa. 584, 1973 ; 2. Parental immunity: Falco v. Pados, 444 Pa. 372 , 282 A. 2d 351, 1971 ; 3. Charitable immunity: Flagiello v. … Brown v. Brown, Mass. 1980 (citation not available until case reported) involved a fall by the wife on property owned with the husband as tenants by the entirety. Extending their prior holding in Lewis v.

Harlow v. Commonwealth

2 Va. Cir. 473 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jan 16, 1979

, motions and rulings thereon by the Board or hearing officer, transcripts of proceedings, exhibits admitted into evidence, brief memorandum submitted to the Board, hearing officer's reports, board opinions and orders. *474 … by the Board.

Tom Mistick & Sons, Inc. v. Grasha Real Estate, Inc.

13 Pa. D. & C.3d 451 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 3, 1979

See Black and Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc. 233 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 , 335 A. 2d 722 (1975); MacKanick v. Rubin, 244 Pa. … In Cellutron Products Corp. v. Stewart, 223 Pa.

State v. Charles

8 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 65 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 15, 1908

Thomas v. Wilton, 40 O. S., 516; Gregory v. Small, 39 O. S., 346; Stewart v. Southard, 17 O. S., 412; Ramsey v. Riley, 13 O., 107 ; Commissioners of Brown County v. Butt, 2 O., 353 . … The liability is charged against “the board of county commissioners” and “in their official capacity.”

Reynolds v. Schweinefus

1 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 215 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Apr 15, 1871

Striker v. Kelly, 7 Hill, 24 . In The People v. Carpenter, 24 N. … The court cite, as illustrating the various applications of the doctrine, Williams v. East India Co., 3 E. 192; Kelly v. Connell, 3 Dana, 532 ; Wheelock v. Hall, 3 N. H. 310; Brown v. Connelly, 5 Blackf. 390 ; Hart v.

Hill v. Bolden

191 Misc. 2d 354 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2002

Brown and the ACA. … Brown and the ACA. .

We The People v. Board of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2006

) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL) PROTECTION and BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ) et als, Respondents, The Petitioners in these consolidated appeals challenge a decision of the Board of Environmental … The decisions g v e considerable attention to hydrogeology and geology. Issues of noise, odor, impact and traffic have been the subject of the licensing applications and review.

Ickes v. State

16 Ohio C.C. 31 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1898

Forsythe v. State, 6 Ohio, 6; also 23 Ohio St., 354 . … I will call attention to Brown’s testimony on page 131. Brown was an employe there. ‘‘Q. Who was the managing editor of the paper? A. Joseph M. Iekes.” Mr.

Wagner v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.

3 Pa. D. & C.3d 23 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Dec 14, 1976

Superior Ct. 469 , 294 A.2d 898 (1972), Madrid Motor Corp. v. Cashan, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 383 , 213 A.2d 284 (1965) and Black and Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc., 233 Pa. … Oakley, Inc. v. School District of Philadelphia, 464 Pa. 330 , 346 A.2d 765 (1975).

Garand v. Snowshoe Village Unit Owners Assoc.

Superior Court of Maine · May 18, 2005

The minutes of the board indicate that the accepted color was brown or a shade thereof. … The defendants' witnesses assertion that the board had accepted brown, but no lighter than the Moody's, is not documented.

Johnston v. Marinus

18 Abb. N. Cas. 72 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1886

Brown, J. … Browne. Lowry v. Plitt, 16 Am. L. Reg., N. S., 155; and Note by the Editor; also XI. Am. L. Rev., 781 (as to contests between next of kin of equal degree). Burial in Cases of Contagious Diseases, by Rev. Eli Corwin, D.

Litt v. Emery

62 N.Y. St. Rep. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1894

Brown, P. J., concurs; Cullen, J., not sitting. *410 The opinion of the justice upon the granting of a peremptory writ of mandamus was as follows: ‘Cullen, J. … It was said by the court of appeals : ‘The law does not recognize the principle that a board of officers can reduce the amount fixed by law for a salaried officer, or that the official can make a contract to that effect.