Case law

People ex rel. Vequilla v. Johnson

122 Misc. 2d 803 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1984

Delgado v Walters, 91 AD2d 1053 ). Respondents have failed to demonstrate that petitioner was not within the convenience and practical control of the Parole Board prior to November 2, 1983. … Delgado v Walters, supra; People ex rel. Brown v Walters, 84 AD2d 852 ). During this time period, parole merely had the warrant against petitioner executed and requested that petitioner be extradited.

Armitage v. Fisher

4 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1893

Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 393 ; Davis v. American Society, etc., 75 id. 369. … In Palmer v. Foley, 45 How.

Beisel v. Zerbe Township

3 Pa. D. & C.3d 355 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County · Sep 2, 1977

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth on the same day that Ayala was announced: Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566 , 305 A.2d 868 (1973). . … We have little doubt that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Brown v.

New York City Mission Society v. Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in U. S. A.

174 Misc. 268 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1940

A question is raised as to the right of the defendant, The Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. … On January 20, 1928, the name of this corporation was changed to “ The Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A.,” the defendant in this action.

United Railways & Electric Co. v. Laird

3 Balt. C. Rep. 331 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Jun 2, 1914

The authority to determine on the quality and grade of equipment is peculiarly the province of the board of directors of the company, because of the responsibility of the board to the stockholders for the proper management … Garrett Brown and his neighbors to sliow that they badly need additional service.

People v. Wallace

49 Misc. 2d 111 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1966

The only limitation on the power of the Parole Board in this, and similar cases, is that it may not incarcerate a defendant for a period exceeding five years on each respective sentence (People ex rel. Johnson v. … Kern v. Silberglitt, 4 N Y 2d 59, affg. 3 A D 2d 996; People v. Gross, 5 N Y 2d 131); nor should this case be confused with the question presented to this court in the Matter of Browne v.

Beulike v. Department of Highways

15 Ct. Cl. 120 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1984

At that time, he completed a number of forms including a “West Virginia Public Insurance Board acceptance and payroll deduction authority” card. … Folio, administrative assistant of the Public Employees Insurance Board, testified that the refund was denied because claimant was afforded family coverage during the period in question.

Liebmann v. Aldhous

105 Misc. 728 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jan 15, 1919

Rheims v. Dolley, 93 Misc. Rep. 500 ; Silverman v. Isaac, 183 App. Div. 542 . … Richmond v. Lee, 123 App. Div. 279 ; Witty v. Matthews, 52 N. Y. 512 ; Watson v. Almirall, 61 App. Div. 429 ; Franklin v. Brown, 118 N. Y. 110 . The defendants knew that the premises were not in proper condition.

Houck v. Bobrow Bros.

3 Pa. D. & C. 766 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Feb 26, 1923

Quoting the language we used in Rudy v. Troup, 67 Pa. … Chief Justice Brown, in Wise v.

PennDOT v. Shaffer

20 Pa. D. & C.4th 148 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County · Jun 3, 1993

Commw. 156 , 546 A.2d 155 (1988); Commonwealth v. Chalfant, 129 Pa. Commw. 430 , 565 A.2d 1252 (1989). At the time we heard this appeal on May 16, 1991, there was the case of Commonwealth v. … The defense of the Rehabilitation Act was squarely raised by the defendant here and we adopt the reasoning of the Commonwealth Court in PennDOT v. Brown, 125 Pa. Commw. 372 , 558 A.2d 121 (1989).

Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of State University of New York

169 Misc. 2d 210 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1996

Board of Trustees ( 184 AD2d 508 ) and a second decision bearing the same caption, to wit, Matter of American Socy. for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Board of Trustees ( 165 AD2d 561 , affd 79 NY2d 927 ). … Moreover, "the humane treatment of animals may well constitute public business” (Matter of American Socy. for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Board of Trustees, 165 AD2d, supra, at 565).

Pomeroy v. Tyler

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 514 · City of New York Municipal Court · Apr 15, 1887

Bloomer v. Merrill, 1 Daly, 496 ; Mumford v. Brown, 6 Cow., 476 . … He may, if he desires,invoke the assistance of the board of health, but this dernier resort would have been unprofitable, for the tenant in the present case, agreed in his lease to obey all lawful orders of the health board

Carman v. Fox

86 Misc. 197 · New York County Courts · Jun 15, 1914

Laws, chap. 50), §§ 242, 259; Porter v. Bleiler, 17 Barb. 149 ; Post v. Martens, 2 Robt. 437; Long v. Poth, 16 Misc. Rep. 85, 87 ; Larkin v. Badosta, 119 App. Div. 515 . … Citing Haydock v. Stow, 40 N. Y. 370, 371 ; Whitlock v. Washburn, 62 Hun, 374 ; Stetson v. Patten, 2 Me. 1 ; Pars. Eq. Cas. 95; Videau v. Griffin, 21 Cal. 389 .

Augostini v. Lasky

46 Misc. 2d 1058 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1965

In Seaman v. … (Goldstein v. Rockefeller, 45 Misc 2d 778 ; State ex rel. Sonneborn v. Sylvester, 132 N. W. 2d 249 [Wis.]; Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of City of Baltimore, 234 F. Supp. 945 ; Bianchi v. Griffing, 238 F.

Cuker v. Mikalauskas

35 Pa. D. & C.4th 87 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 26, 1998

Their decision is set forth in Cuker v. Mikalauskas, 547 Pa. 600 , 692 A.2d 1042 (1997). … CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Having applied the relevant legal criteria enunciated in Cuker v.

Schepeler v. Eisner

3 Daly 11 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1869

Y. 392 ; Willoughby v. Comstock, 3 Hill, 389 ; Allen v. Dykers, id. 593; Stearns v. Marsh, 4 Denio, 227 ; 2 Kent’s Com. 582, 583; 2 Story’s Eq. Jurisp. §§ 1008, 1009.) … Jurisp. §§ 1008,1009.) “ The primary, and, indeed, the only purpose of the pledge,” says Brown, J., in Wheeler v.

Whiting v. Smith

8 Ct. Cl. 45 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1969

Nor was it shown by evidence that the flow accelerated or was •artifically channeled so as to increase the servitude *48 upon Petitioner’s lot as was shown in Manley v. Brown, 90 W. … Co. v. Carter, 91 Va. 587 , 22 S.E. 517 . Jordan v. Benwood, 42 W. Va. 312 , 26 S.E. 266 , and Lindamood v. Board of Education, 92 W. Va. 387 , 114 S. E. 800 .

Brooklyn Central Rail Road v. Brooklyn City Rail Road

32 Barb. 358 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1860

Brown, J. … In Dartmouth College v.

Corey v. People

45 Barb. 262 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1865

v. … (Scribner v. Beach, 4 Denio, 448 . Willard v. Warren, 17 Wend. 257 . People v. Smith, 24 Barb. 16 .)

Rogers v. Edmund

21 Ohio C.C. 675 · Licking Circuit Court · Mar 15, 1901

In Vincent v. … Storer and placed that business in the Chicago Board of Trade &c.