Case law

Appeal of Albert

128 Pa. 613 · Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Northumberland County · Oct 7, 1889

For this guardian’s derelictions in these respects he is duly punished by being denied all compensation for his services, and any recompense whatever for the board and maintenance of his ward after the latter came to live … N. 94, and Brown’s App., 112 Pa. 18 .

Rogers v. McCoach

66 Misc. 85 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1910

McNeil v. Board of Supervisors, 114 App. Div. 761, 764 ; Atwood v. Armstrong, 102 id. 601, 607; Hatch v. Mann, 15 Wend. 44 ; Fargo v. Arthur, 43 How. Pr. 193, 197 ; City Bank v. Bangs, 2 Edw. Ch. 95, 97-105 ; Gregg v. … The negative seems to be asserted in McNeil v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 114 App. Div. 764 ; Hatch v. Mann, supra, 15 Wend. 44 , and Fargo v. Arthur, supra, 43 How. Pr. 197 .

Wells v. State

38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 142 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 7, 1985

Racine Currency Exchange, Inc. (1973), 56 Ill. 2d 84 , 305 N.E.2d 529 ; Ozment v. Lance (1982), 107 Ill. App. 3d 348 , 437 N.E.2d 930 ; Burks v. Madyun (1982), 105 Ill. App. 3d 917 , 435 N.E.2d 185 . … As stated by the Court in Burks v.

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. First National Bank

77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 520 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1893

(Kihlberg v. U. S., 97 U. S. 398 ; U. S. v. Robeson, 9 Pet. 319 ; Smith v. Briggs, 3 Den. 73 ; McMahon v. N. Y. & E. R. R. Co., 20 N. Y. 464 ; Smith v. Brady, 17 id. 174 ; Butler v. Tucker, 24 Wend. 447 ; Whitemam v. … (See Reeves v. Kimball, 40 N. Y. 311 ; Mayenborg v.

Board of Mgrs. of the Biltmore Towers Condominium v. Cox

2025 NY Slip Op 51277(U) · New York Supreme Court, Westchester County · Aug 11, 2025

Board of Mgrs. of the Biltmore Towers Condominium v Cox ( 2025 NY Slip Op 51277(U) ) [*1] Board of Mgrs. of the Biltmore Towers Condominium v Cox 2025 NY Slip Op 51277(U) Decided on August 11, 2025 Supreme Court, Westchester … Decided on August 11, 2025 Supreme Court, Westchester County Board of Managers of the Biltmore Towers Condominium, Petitioner, against Gerald W. Cox, Barbara Andralliski and Monica Andralliski, Respondents.

Tirado v. Board of Trustees of the New York City Fire Department Pension Fund

48 Misc. 3d 690 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 29, 2014

Board’s August 2012 meeting. … (Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, 431 [2009].)

In re the Arbitration between Kaiser & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

35 Misc. 2d 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1962

(Deso v. London & Lancashire Ind. Co., 3 N Y 2d 127; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Manger, 30 Misc 2d 326 .) The burden of proving that any delay in giving notice was reasonable is upon the insured. (Rushing v. Commercial Cas. … [Brown], 15 A D 2d 578.)

Lottimer v. Lord

4 E.D. Smith 183 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1855

(Howell v. Ripley, 10 Paige, 43 ; Innes v. Lansings, 7 id. 583.) … Such was the case in Osborn et al. v.

Welsh v. Taylor

2 N.Y.S. 815 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1888

Stokoe v. Singers, 8 El. & Bl. 31; Crossley v. Lightowler, L. R. 3 Eq. 279; Cook v. Mayor, L. R. 6 Eq. 177. … Crawford, 10 Mass. 183 ; Pope v. O'Hara, 48 N. Y. 447 , 452; Smyles v. Hastings, 22 N. Y. 217, 224 ; Wiggins v. McCleary, 49 N. Y. 346, 348 ; Jennison v. Walker, 11 Gray, 423 , 425; Owen v.

Schepeler v. Eisner

3 Daly 11 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1869

Y. 392 ; Willoughby v. Comstock, 3 Hill, 389 ; Allen v. Dykers, id. 593; Stearns v. Marsh, 4 Denio, 227 ; 2 Kent’s Com. 582, 583; 2 Story’s Eq. Jurisp. §§ 1008, 1009.) … Jurisp. §§ 1008,1009.) “ The primary, and, indeed, the only purpose of the pledge,” says Brown, J., in Wheeler v.

PennDOT v. Shaffer

20 Pa. D. & C.4th 148 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County · Jun 3, 1993

Commw. 156 , 546 A.2d 155 (1988); Commonwealth v. Chalfant, 129 Pa. Commw. 430 , 565 A.2d 1252 (1989). At the time we heard this appeal on May 16, 1991, there was the case of Commonwealth v. … The defense of the Rehabilitation Act was squarely raised by the defendant here and we adopt the reasoning of the Commonwealth Court in PennDOT v. Brown, 125 Pa. Commw. 372 , 558 A.2d 121 (1989).

Raynor v. New York & Long Island Traction Co.

86 Misc. 201 · New York County Courts · Jun 15, 1914

White- *205 house v. … Schoe llkopf v. Coatsworth, 166 N. Y. 77, 84 ; Sanford v. Brown Brothers Co., 208 id. 90, 96 .

Houck v. Bobrow Bros.

3 Pa. D. & C. 766 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Feb 26, 1923

Quoting the language we used in Rudy v. Troup, 67 Pa. … Chief Justice Brown, in Wise v.

Armitage v. Fisher

4 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1893

Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 393 ; Davis v. American Society, etc., 75 id. 369. … In Palmer v. Foley, 45 How.

Beisel v. Zerbe Township

3 Pa. D. & C.3d 355 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County · Sep 2, 1977

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth on the same day that Ayala was announced: Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566 , 305 A.2d 868 (1973). . … We have little doubt that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Brown v.

People v. Wallace

49 Misc. 2d 111 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1966

The only limitation on the power of the Parole Board in this, and similar cases, is that it may not incarcerate a defendant for a period exceeding five years on each respective sentence (People ex rel. Johnson v. … Kern v. Silberglitt, 4 N Y 2d 59, affg. 3 A D 2d 996; People v. Gross, 5 N Y 2d 131); nor should this case be confused with the question presented to this court in the Matter of Browne v.

New York City Mission Society v. Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in U. S. A.

174 Misc. 268 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1940

A question is raised as to the right of the defendant, The Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. … On January 20, 1928, the name of this corporation was changed to “ The Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A.,” the defendant in this action.

United Railways & Electric Co. v. Laird

3 Balt. C. Rep. 331 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Jun 2, 1914

The authority to determine on the quality and grade of equipment is peculiarly the province of the board of directors of the company, because of the responsibility of the board to the stockholders for the proper management … Garrett Brown and his neighbors to sliow that they badly need additional service.

Pomeroy v. Tyler

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 514 · City of New York Municipal Court · Apr 15, 1887

Bloomer v. Merrill, 1 Daly, 496 ; Mumford v. Brown, 6 Cow., 476 . … He may, if he desires,invoke the assistance of the board of health, but this dernier resort would have been unprofitable, for the tenant in the present case, agreed in his lease to obey all lawful orders of the health board

Thomson Industries, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Port Washington North

55 Misc. 2d 625 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1967

A similar argument was advanced and rejected by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Presnell v. … Regulation of these matters may well be left to local regulation without impairment of the national interest in the matter (Parker v. Brown, 317 U. S. 341, 362-363 ).