Case law

Citizens for Responsible Development-Windsor Township Inc. v. Windsor Township Zoning Hearing Board

70 Pa. D. & C.4th 427 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Nov 30, 2004

Rushford v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Pittsburgh, 81 Pa. Commw. 274, 278 , 473 A.2d 719, 722 (1984). Further, the trial court must give great weight and deference to the board’s determination. Smith v. … Hanoverian Inc. v. Lehigh County Board of Assessment, 701 A.2d 288, 289 (Pa. Commw. 1997).

Chamberlain v. Western Transportation Co.

45 Barb. 218 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1866

(Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 85 . Pardee v. Drew, 25 Wend. 459 . Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 586 , 589.) … And see Hill v. Patten, (8 East, 373,) where it was held that the term “ goods ” did not include the ship’s outfit, but extended only to “the wares or cargo for-sale laden on board the ship.”

Sechrest v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21

5 Misc. 2d 557 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1957

Proof of additional facts by affidavit is not permitted upon such a motion (Matter of Mopes v. Swezey, 199 Misc. 997 , affd. 278 App. Div. 959 ; Matter of Felice v. Swezey, 278 App. Div. 958 ). … It shows by Exhibit “ F ” petitioner’s notice of appointment by the board and his acceptance. It is alleged that he acted as principal for three years and was paid by the board in that capacity.

Wright v. Wiedower

56 Va. Cir. 470 · Winchester County Circuit Court · Sep 26, 2001

ACB Trucking, Inc. v. Griffin, 5 Va. App. 542, 547-48 , 365 S.E.2d 334 (1988) (citations omitted). Potentially conflicting statutes should be harmonized to give force and effect to each. See Board of Supervisors v. … Sansom v. Board of Supervisors of Madison County, 257 Va. 589, 595 , 514 S.E.2d 345, 349 (1999).

Nuttall v. Simis

22 Misc. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1897

If the adjudication in the mandamus proceeding against the corporate board, by which the plaintiff was restored to Ms place, necessarily embraced tMs question, nevertheless it is not binding in this action of tort against … Owen, 19 Barb. 22 ; Brown v. Smith, 24 id. 419; Bell v. Pierce, 48 id. 51; Id., 51 N. Y. 12 ; Barhyte v. Shepherd, 35 id. 238; Parish v. Golden, id. 462; Throop on Pub. Officers, §§ 541, 738).

Salmon v. M. E. Blasier Manufacturing Co.

53 Misc. 36 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1907

Brown v. Bristol, 1 Cow. 176 ; Newcomb v. … I do not think Robinson v.

Daber, Inc. v. Corbisiero

7 Va. Cir. 532 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jan 17, 1979

Brown. On July 18, 1978, Judge Marvin F. Cole conducted a hearing as to other matters of discovery, but the question of the subject letter did not arise at that time.

Harr v. Wright

164 Misc. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1936

(Gold v. Paynter, 101 Va. 714 ; 44 S. E. 920 .) The contract of subscription is an agreement to pay the unpaid part thereof, from time to time, as it is called for by the board of directors. (Wyman v. Bowman, [C. C. … Land Co. v. Raymond, 158 N. Y. 576 ; Sigua Iron Co. v. Brown, 171 id. 488; Richards v. Robin, 86 Misc. 528, 532 ; affd., 225 N. Y. 719 ; Campbell v. American Alkili Co., [C. C. A.] 125 Fed. 207 ; 14 C.

Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

188 Misc. 2d 146 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2001

“It is a maxim of statutory construction that the intent of the Legislature is the primary consideration” (Matter of Brusco v Braun, 199 AD2d 27, 32 , affd 84 NY2d 674 ). … Furthermore, a construction that would produce an “absurdity” is to be rejected (Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 NY2d 131, 137 ).

Bowers v. Viereck

66 Ohio Law. Abs. 467 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Aug 3, 1953

Lehman Co. v. Piggly-Wiggly Corp., 45 Abs 528 ; Brown v. Ginn, Trustee, 66 Oh St 316. Under §5919 GC, defining “the owner of suph land,” Dr. Donald F. … Board of Trustees of Trenton Township, Delaware County, 49 Oh Ap 172. The above case cites Buchanan Bridge Co. v. Campbell, et al.

Williams v. Meyer

48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 545 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886

(Howland v. Edmonds, 24 N. Y., 307 ; Tuckerman v. Brown, 33 id., 297; Lake Ontario, etc., R. R. Co. v. Mason, 16 id., 451.) … And the case of Scovill v. Thayer ( 105 U. S., 143 ) is opposed to that conclusion. But the authorities cited in the opinion, as well as Goshen Turnpike Company v.

Huestis v. County of Nassau

40 Misc. 2d 858 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1963

As stated in Senrow Concessions v. … Y. 290, 294 ); and the county did not lose control of this property because Fabrizio could be ousted without cause on short notice (Blank v. Browne, 217 App. Div. 624, 628 [2d Dept.]).

Matter of Kirklin v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long Beach

New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2018

Thus, the four month period of CPLR § 217(1) does not apply to an Article 78 proceeding challenging a variance granted by a town zoning board ( Crowell v Zoning Board , 151 AD3d 1247, 1249 [3d Dept 2017]). … The granting of a variance requires zoning board action ( Haberman v Zoning Board , 9 NY3d 269, 275 [2007]).

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Gold Shield Inc.

52 Ohio Misc. 105 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Nov 19, 1975

S. 1 ; United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan (1971), 401 U. S. 576 ; N. A. A. C. P. v. Button (1963), 371 U. S. 415 ; United Mine Workers v. … Brown, Secretary of State of Ohio. Judgment for the costs will be entered against the defendants. Judgment accordingly.

Brander v. Town of Warren

18 Misc. 3d 477 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2007

(See 6 NYCRR 617.9 [b] [5] [v].) … (See Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y. v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 72 NY2d 674 [1988]; see also Matter of Penfield Panorama Area Community v Town of Penfield Planning Bd., 253 AD2d 342 [4th Dept 1999].)

People's Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Oswego

108 Misc. 247 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1919

The decision of Judge Vann in the case of Carroll v. … In the case of Varick v.

Rodriguez v. Brooklyn Public Library

34 Misc. 3d 310 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2011

City of New York, 304 NY 440, 443 ; Sweeney v City of New York, 225 NY 271, 273 ; Purdy v City of New York, 193 NY 521, *318 523 ).” … (Salesian Socy. v Village of Ellenville, 41 NY2d 521 , 524 [1977]; see Nasca v Town of Brookhaven, 10 AD3d 415, 416 [2d Dept 2004]; Alford v City of New York, 115 AD2d 420, 421 [1st Dept 1985]; Matter of Crespo, 123 Misc

Conger v. Treadway

3 Silv. Sup. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1889

Irving Brown, for appellant. Geo. W. Weiant, for respondents. Pratt. J. … Treadway, 132 Id. 259; Matter of Board, etc., 62 Hun, 499 ; 133 N. Y. 436 ; Seymour v. Spring Forest Cem. Ass’n, 64 Hun, 632 .

Allstrom v. Lorenz

198 Misc. 970 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

In Matter of Allen v. … The court upheld the board’s position on the authority of Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

Aquilani's License

32 Pa. D. & C. 348 · Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · May 14, 1938

Brown, Jr., J., This is an appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board suspending a restaurant liquor license for a period of five days. … liquors; and very wisely does not attempt to catalogue the causes which it deems sufficient, leaving it to the legal discretion of the court to determine, subject to review on certiorari by the appellate courts: Sterrett v.