Case law

Brown v. Mitchell

1 Cole. Cas. 84 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1799

DellaGala v. Brown

178 Misc. 2d 445 · Yonkers City Court · Sep 22, 1998

According to Della-Gala, Brown accepted responsibility for the loss (plaintiff’s exhibit 4 [“I did not receive a check from Mr. Brown until August *447 4, 1997. Mr. … Peek, Inc. v Agee, 235 AD2d 790 , 790- 791 [1997]; see also, Farrauto, Berman, Fontana & Selznick v Keowongwan, 166 Misc 2d 804, 810 [1995]).

Brown v. Wiggin

16 N.H. 312 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1844

The delivery on board the packet for the purpose of being sent to Boston, *318 there to be delivered, not to the plaintiff’s agent, but to the agent of the Mechanics Company, who was entrusted by the company with the duty … Sumner v. Hamlet, 12 Pick. 76 . But the possession of a carrier whose authority was to deliver to an agent of the company, can not be regarded as the plaintiff’s possession. Baker v. Fuller, 21 Pick. 318 .

Lauer v. Brown

30 Barb. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1859

Brown v. Kenley

6 Va. Cir. 101 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Mar 13, 1984

Reid v. Brown

1 Wilson 312 · Indiana Superior Court · Jul 1, 1873

Jenkins v. Long, 19 Ind., 28 ; Honeywell v. Holmes, Ind., 321. The plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary M. Brown. She moved for a new trial; her motion was overruled, and final judgment rendered. … Brown, and could be impeached by Mary M. Brown, the alleged fraudulent grantee, only for fraud, notwithstanding she was not a party to the judgment. Sumner v. Coleman, 20 Ind., 486 , and cases cited; Burgess v.

Brown v. Goodwin

1 Abb. N. Cas. 452 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1876

That it was necessary that the requisites of law, through which an individual is deprived of his property, should be complied with (Jackson v. Shepard, 7 Cow. 88 ; Parker v. Overman, 18 How. U. 8. 137; Osterman v. … In order to have made a valid sale of the premises in question, the requirements of this section should also have been complied with (Williams v. Peyton, supra; Stead v. Course, 4 Cranch, 403 ).

Brown v. Bailey

84 Pa. D. & C. 269 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 12, 1952

Brown v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 283 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 8, 1979

Brown is not entitled to that pay period from the Department of Labor. He is, therefore, entitled to only 16 pay periods as opposed to the 17 for which he made claim. Except for the fact that Mr. … Brown was employed by the State of Illinois on June 30, 1978, the issues raised in this case are identical to those in the case of John J. Beard v. State of Illinois, 78-CC-1585.

Brown v. State

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 194 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 18, 1950

Brown started to pick up a piece of concrete. As he lifted, he felt a sharp pain in his right hip region. Although the pain persisted, Mr. Brown continued working. He consulted his family physician, Dr. J. … Rufus Brown, who was operated upon on December 7, 1948 at Barnes Hospital, was seen on June 9, 1949. He had moderate limitation of back motions in all directions.

Brown v. State

22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 231 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 10, 1956

On August 16, 1953, claimant, Iva Ann Brown, a resident of St. Louis, Missouri, attended the Illinois State Fair at Springfield, Illinois.

Brown v. State

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 366 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 12, 1927

Welsh v. Brown

2 Miles 108 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 13, 1837

Gilson v. Brown

5 Pa. D. & C. 725 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County · Sep 2, 1924

Brown against said decedent $234.04, and to his wife, Mrs. Brown, $298.29. It also appears that said plaintiff, as administrator of said estafe, made a public sale of decedent’s personal property, and that A. H. … Brown and wife, the plaintiff, acting as administrator, drew a check to A. H. Brown for $234.04, which was endorsed by him and returned to the administrator; and a check of $298.29 payable to Mrs.

Brown v. Nickel

1 Balt. C. Rep. 212 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Oct 5, 1891

Mead v. Brown

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 477 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1911

The account attached and marked Exhibit A reads as follows: Jane Brown & Sons, Dr., to "W. IT. … I am cited by the plaintiff to the 50th Ohio State, Newark Machine Company v.

Alexander v. Brown

2 Disney (Ohio) 395 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Nov 15, 1858

Kleinman v. Brown

30 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 69 · Cincinnati Municipal Court · Nov 19, 1932

Gibson v. Mundell, 29 O. S. 525, 529. … To the same effect see Bulla v. Kent, 15 O. D. N. P. 409. The proceedings in aid of execution are therefor dismissed.

Cole v. Brown

33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 450 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Nov 4, 1908

Brown v. Trottner

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 222 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Feb 14, 1896

An appeal was taken by Brown to the court of common pleas. … On this proposition we are cited by counsel for defendant in error to the case of Clapp et al., v. Banking Co. et al., 50 O. S., beginning on page 528.