Case law

Wentz v. Brown

29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 316 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

Brown v. Griswold

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Brown v. Orvis

6 How. Pr. 376 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1851

Tuckerman v. Brown

23 How. Pr. 109 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1862

And after the company is organized, a committee first reduce it to $50, and then the board return the note, without any assessment having ever been made upon it, or any portion of it whatever having been paid. … Brown, decided at the general term in the sixth district, and reported in 11th Abb., 389.

Leeds v. Brown

5 Abb. Pr. 418 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1857

Wetmore v. Brown

37 Barb. 133 · New York Supreme Court · May 5, 1862

Dobbins v. Brown

1 N.Y.S. 360 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1888

Two cases involving the same issues of fact and law have already been determined by this court, to-wit, Boardman v. Brown, 44 Hun, 336 , and Burke v. Same, 47 Hun. 635 , (decided at the last general term.)

Simpson v. Brown

2 N.Y.S. 571 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1888

compare the said registers, make them agree, and ascertain the number of persons who, by them, are shown to have voted at that poll that day, and when they have made comparisons and ascertained such fact, the chairman of the board … Draper v. Johnston, Clarke, Elec. 711. The opinion of the attorney general, which was referred to on the argument of this case, does not relate to the questions herein discussed.

Brown v. Mitchell

1 Cole. Cas. 84 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1799

DellaGala v. Brown

178 Misc. 2d 445 · Yonkers City Court · Sep 22, 1998

According to Della-Gala, Brown accepted responsibility for the loss (plaintiff’s exhibit 4 [“I did not receive a check from Mr. Brown until August *447 4, 1997. Mr. … Peek, Inc. v Agee, 235 AD2d 790 , 790- 791 [1997]; see also, Farrauto, Berman, Fontana & Selznick v Keowongwan, 166 Misc 2d 804, 810 [1995]).

Brown v. Wiggin

16 N.H. 312 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1844

The delivery on board the packet for the purpose of being sent to Boston, *318 there to be delivered, not to the plaintiff’s agent, but to the agent of the Mechanics Company, who was entrusted by the company with the duty … Sumner v. Hamlet, 12 Pick. 76 . But the possession of a carrier whose authority was to deliver to an agent of the company, can not be regarded as the plaintiff’s possession. Baker v. Fuller, 21 Pick. 318 .

Matlack v. Brown

2 Miles 15 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 15, 1836

Kline v. Woods, 9 S. & R. 299. Plaintiff having elected to bring replevin in this court, it is not in his power to say the court has no jurisdiction.

Lauer v. Brown

30 Barb. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1859

Reed v. Brown

10 Ohio C.C. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

Brown, as executor under the last will and testament of Robert Brown, deceased, late of Hartland, in the county of Huron and state of Ohio, which will was duly proved and admitted to probate by the probate court for said … Brown is one of the sureties on the bond of said executor.”

Bonnell v. Brown

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 712 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Mar 7, 1908

Morris v. Frank W. Brown] involves the title to 2006 shares of stock in the Reading Turnpike Company which originally belonged to the estate of Lloyd S. Brown, deceased, father of plaintiffs and defendant. … Williams v. Presbyterian Soc. 1 Ohio St. 478 ; Sec. 4974 Rev. Stat.

Leverone v. Brown

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 277 · Hamilton Circuit Court · May 8, 1909

We do not think the holding of this court in Swing, Trustee, v. Crane et al, 11 C. C.—N.

Stokes v. Brown

2 Sweeny 457 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 4, 1870

the five days’ notice required by the terms of the contract was intended to be, and was, a condition precedent to the right of the vendors to deliver and to the obligation of the plaintiffs to receive the oil (see Fowler v. … Anderson, 1 Hill, 519 ; Topping v. Root, 5 Cowen, 404; Fowler v. Rigney, supra; Benjamin on Sales, 431; Hilliard on Sales, 158).

Roosevelt v. Brown

1 Duer 642 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 15, 1852

Brown v. Colie

1 E.D. Smith 265 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Nov 15, 1851

Brown v. Mayor

6 Daly 497 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 5, 1876

The board of aldermen, acting in their capacity as a board of supervisors, by the passage of a resolution, October 1, 1874, directed Mr. … Stat. 364, § 1, subd. 3; p. 367, § 2, v. d. 2, 3; L. 1874, ch. 304, § 2). *500 The general act of 1872, in relation to elections in the city and county of New York, provides, by the 91st section, for the payment of the county